Paper detail

Validation scheme for solar coronal models -- constraints from multi-perspective observations in EUV and white-light

Context: In this paper we present a validation scheme to investigate the quality of coronal magnetic field models, which is based upon comparisons with observational data from multiple sources. Aims: Many of these coronal models may use a range of initial parameters that produce a large number of physically reasonable field configurations. However, that does not mean that these results are reliable and comply with the observations. With an appropriate validation scheme the quality of a coronal model can be assessed. Methods: The validation scheme is developed on the example of the EUropean Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset (EUHFORIA) coronal model. For observational comparison we use EUV and white-light data to detect coronal features on the surface (open magnetic field areas) and off-limb (streamer and loop) structures from multiple perspectives (Earth view and the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory - STEREO). The validation scheme can be applied to any coronal model that produces magnetic field line topology. Results: We show its applicability by using that validation scheme on a large set of model configurations, which can be efficiently reduced to an ideal set of parameters that matches best with observational data. Conclusions: We conclude that by using a combined empirical visual classification with a mathematical scheme of topology metrics a very efficient and rather objective quality assessment for coronal models can be performed.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.