BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

A. M. Veronig

A. M. Veronig contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Multi-instrument STIX microflare study

During its commissioning phase in 2020, the Spectrometer/Telescope for Imaging X-rays (STIX) on board the Solar Orbiter spacecraft observed 69 microflares. The two most significant events from this set (of GOES class B2 and B6) were observed on-disk from the spacecraft as well as from Earth and analysed in terms of the spatial, temporal, and spectral characteristics. We complement the observations from the STIX instrument with EUV imagery from SDO/AIA and GOES soft X-ray data by adding imaging and plasma diagnostics over different temperature ranges for a detailed microflare case study that is focussed on energy release and transport. Spectral fitting of the STIX data shows clear nonthermal emission for both microflares studied here. The deduced plasma parameters from DEM reconstruction as well as spectral fitting roughly agree with the values in the literature for microflares as do the nonthermal fit parameters from STIX. The observed Neupert effects and impulsive and gradual phases indicate that both events covered in this study are consistent with the standard chromospheric evaporation flare scenario. For the B6 event on 7 June 2020, this interpretation is further supported by the temporal evolution seen in the DEM profiles of the flare ribbons and loops. For this event, we also find that accelerated electrons can roughly account for the required thermal energy. The 6 June 2020 event demonstrates that STIX can detect nonthermal emission for GOES class B2 events that is nonetheless smaller than the background rate level. We demonstrate for the first time how detailed multi-instrument studies of solar flares can be performed with STIX.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The effect of spatial sampling on magnetic field modeling and helicity computation

Nonlinear force-free (NLFF) modeling is regularly used in order to indirectly infer the 3D geometry of the coronal magnetic field, not accessible on a regular basis by means of direct measurements otherwise. We study the effect of binning in time series NLFF modeling of individual active regions (ARs) in order to quantify the effect of a different underlying spatial sampling on the quality of modeling as well as on the derived physical parameters. We apply an optimization method to sequences of SDO/HMI vector magnetogram data at three different plate scales for three solar ARs to obtain nine NLFF model time series. From the NLFF models, we deduce active-region magnetic fluxes, electric currents, magnetic energies and relative helicities, and analyze those with respect to the underlying spatial sampling. We calculate various metrics to quantify the quality of the derived NLFF models and apply a Helmholtz decomposition to characterize solenoidal errors. At a given spatial sampling, the quality of NLFF modeling is different for different ARs, as well as varies along of the individual model time series. For a given AR, modeling at a given spatial sampling is not necessarily of superior quality compared to that performed with a different plate scale. Generally, the NLFF model quality tends to be higher for larger pixel sizes with the solenoidal quality being the ultimate cause for systematic variations in model-deduced physical quantities. Optimization-based modeling based on binned SDO/HMI vector data delivers magnetic energies and helicity estimates different by $\lesssim$30\%, given that concise checks ensure the physical plausibility and high solenoidal quality of the tested model. Thus, spatial-sampling-induced differences are relatively small compared to that arising from other sources of uncertainty.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Tracking magnetic flux and helicity from Sun to Earth -- Multi-spacecraft analysis of a magnetic cloud and its solar source

We analyze the complete chain of effects caused by a solar eruptive event in order to better understand the dynamic evolution of magnetic-field related quantities in interplanetary space, in particular that of magnetic flux and helicity. We study a series of connected events (a confined C4.5 flare, a flare-less filament eruption and a double-peak M-class flare) that originated in NOAA active region (AR) 12891 on 2021 November 1 and November 2. We deduce the magnetic structure of AR 12891 using stereoscopy and nonlinear force-free (NLFF) magnetic field modeling, allowing us to identify a coronal flux rope and to estimate its axial flux and helicity. Additionally, we compute reconnection fluxes based on flare ribbon and coronal dimming signatures from remote sensing imagery. Comparison to corresponding quantities of the associated magnetic cloud (MC), deduced from in-situ measurements from Solar Orbiter and near-Earth spacecraft, allows us to draw conclusions on the evolution of the associated interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME). The latter are aided through the application of geometric fitting techniques (graduated cylindrical shell modeling; GCS) and interplanetary propagation models (drag based ensemble modeling; DBEM) to the ICME. NLFF modeling suggests the host AR's magnetic structure in the form of a left-handed (negative-helicity) sheared arcade/flux rope reaching to altitudes of 8-10 Mm above photospheric levels, in close agreement with the corresponding stereoscopic estimate. Revealed from GCS and DBEM modeling, the ejected flux rope propagated in a self-similar expanding manner through interplanetary space. Comparison of magnetic fluxes and helicities processed by magnetic reconnection in the solar source region and the respective budgets of the MC indicate a considerable contribution from the eruptive process, though the pre-eruptive budgets appear of relevance too.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Variation in solar differential rotation and activity in the period 1964-2016 determined by the Kanzelhöhe data set

We determined the differential rotation (DR) parameters $A$ and $B$ (corresponding to the equatorial rotation velocity and the gradient of the solar DR) by tracing sunspot groups in sunspot drawings of the Kanzelhöhe Observatory for Solar and Environmental Research (KSO; 1964-2008, for solar cycles (SC) 20-23) and KSO white-light images (2009-2016, for SC 24). We used different statistical methods and approaches to analyse cycle related variations, solar cycle phase-related variations and long-term variations of the DR. $A$ and $B$ show statistically significant periodic variability. The changes in $A$ related to solar cycle phase are in accordance with previously reported theoretical and experimental results (higher $A$ during solar minimum, lower $A$ during the maximum of activity), while changes in $B$ differ from the theoretical predictions as we observe more negative values of $B$, that is, a more pronounced DR during activity maximum. The main result of this paper for the long-term variations in $A$ is the detection of a phase shift between the activity flip (in the 1970s) and the equatorial rotation velocity flip (in the early 1990s). During this time period both $A$ and activity show a secular decreasing trend, indicating their correlation. Therefore, the theoretical model fails in the phase-shift time period that occurs after the modern Gleissberg maximum, while in the time period thereafter (after the 1990s), theoretical and experimental results are consistent. The long-term variations in $B$ in general yield an anticorrelation of $B$ and activity, as a rise of $B$ is observed during the entire time period (1964-2016) we analysed, during which activity decreased. We study for the first time the variation in solar DR and activity based on 53 years of KSO data. Our results agree well with the results related to the solar cycle phase from corona observations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Deriving CME density from remote sensing data and comparison to in-situ measurements

We determine the 3D geometry and deprojected mass of 29 well-observed coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and their interplanetary counterparts (ICMEs) using combined STEREO-SOHO white-light data. From the geometry parameters we calculate the volume of the CME for the magnetic ejecta (flux-rope type geometry) and sheath structure (shell-like geometry resembling the (I)CME frontal rim). Working under the assumption that the CME mass is roughly equally distributed within a specific volume, we expand the CME self-similarly and calculate the CME density for distances close to the Sun (15-30 Rs) and at 1AU. Specific trends are derived comparing calculated and in-situ measured proton densities at 1AU, though large uncertainties are revealed due to the unknown mass and geometry evolution: i) a moderate correlation for the magnetic structure having a mass that stays rather constant (~0.56-0.59), and ii) a weak correlation for the sheath density (~0.26) by assuming the sheath region is an extra mass - as expected for a mass pile-up process - that is in its amount comparable to the initial CME deprojected mass. High correlations are derived between in-situ measured sheath density and the solar wind density (~ -0.73) and solar wind speed (~0.56) as measured 24 hours ahead of the arrival of the disturbance. This gives additional confirmation that the sheath-plasma indeed stems from piled-up solar wind material. While the CME interplanetary propagation speed is not related to the sheath density, the size of the CME may play some role in how much material could be piled up.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access