BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ruth Signorell

Ruth Signorell contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.chem-phcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.atm-clus

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Shells in CO$_2$ Clusters

Abundance spectra of (CO$_2$)$_N$ clusters (up to $N \approx$ 500) acquired under a wide range of adiabatic expansion conditions are analyzed within the evaporative ensemble framework. Analysis reveals that cluster stability functions display strikingly universal patterns for all expansion conditions. These patterns reflect the inherent properties of individual clusters. From this analysis the size-dependent cluster binding energies are determined, shell and subshell closing sizes identified, and cuboctahedral packing ordering for sizes above $N \approx 130$ is confirmed. It is demonstrated that a few percent variation in the dissociation energies translates into significant abundance variations, especially for the larger clusters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Below band gap formation of solvated electrons in neutral water clusters?

Below band gap formation of solvated electrons in neutral water clusters using pump-probe photoelectron imaging is compared with recent data for liquid water and with above band gap excitation studies in the liquid and clusters. Similar relaxation times in the order of 200 fs and 1-2 ps are retrieved for below and above band gap excitation, in both clusters and liquid. The relaxation times independence from the generation process indicates that these times are dominated by the solvent response, which is significantly slower than the different solvated electron formation processes. The analysis of the temporal evolution of the vertical electron binding energy and the electron binding energy at half maximum suggests a dependence of the solvation time on the binding energy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Can current experimental data exclude non-Gaussian genuine band shapes in ultraviolet photoelectron spectra of the hydrated electron?

Two recent articles present results that allegedly exclude a possible multimodal distribution of the hydrated electron in ultraviolet photoelectron spectra. The first article bases its conclusion on the assumption that the non-Gaussian genuine band shape previously retrieved for the solvated electron in liquid water is an artefact arising from insufficient electron scattering cross sections used in the retrieval. The second article excludes a multimodal band shape based on a photoelectron spectrum of the solvated electron in water clusters recorded at a single ultraviolet photon energy, and it further assumes that cluster results are transferable to the liquid without further justification. Here, we show that based on current data multimodal distributions cannot be unambiguously excluded. Furthermore, the transferability of cluster results to the liquid can neither be justified nor refuted on the basis of currently available experimental ultraviolet photoelectron spectra.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Comment on: An alternative approach for the determination of mean free paths of electron scattering in liquid water based on experimental data

In a recent article, Schild et al. present what they call an alternative approach to the determination of mean free paths of electron scattering in liquid water. This by no means new approach is based on a very simplistic two channel model of electron scattering with only one fully elastic and one fully inelastic (total loss) channel. The parameterization consists of an elastic cross section, its angular dependence (DCS), and a cross section for electron loss by inelastic scattering. The two cross sections (or the equivalent MFPs) are determined from fits to experimental data (EALs and measured anisotropy parameters). The elastic DCS is calculated ab initio for various cluster models. Furthermore, they claim to find elastic and inelastic mean free paths that are much shorter than those for amorphous ice. We find that there are a number of issues both with the approach of the authors and with the comparison of their results with the literature. As outlined in the comment, the reported values for elastic and inelastic mean free paths are questionable and conclusions regarding the difference between electron scattering in liquid water and amorphous ice are invalid.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Comment on: Is the Hydrated Electron Vertical Detachment Genuinely Bimodal?

In a recent article, David Bartels addresses the issue of the band shape of the genuine binding energy spectrum of the hydrated electron. He essentially claims that the genuine binding energy of the hydrated electron must be Gaussian in shape independent of the photon energy used for ionization, contrary to what was found in our previous work for excitations energies in the UV (3.6-5.8 eV photon energy). Further, he alleges that the asymmetric (bimodal) distribution found for the genuine binding energy in our previous work must have resulted from deficiencies in the scattering cross sections used in the scattering calculations. Bartels concludes that these deficiencies arise from an allegedly wrong value of -1.0eV for the escape barrier used in the original fitting procedure to determine the scattering cross section. In the following, we show that these claims are unfounded and based on partly incorrect assumptions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Electron Scattering in Liquid Water and Amorphous Ice: A Striking Resemblance

The lack of accurate low-energy electron scattering cross sections for liquid water is a substantial source of uncertainty in the modelling of radiation chemistry and biology. The use of existing amorphous ice scattering cross sections for lack of liquid data has been discussed controversially over decades. Here, we compare experimental photoemission data of liquid water with corresponding predictions using amorphous ice cross sections, with the aim of resolving the debate regarding the difference of electron scattering in liquid water and amorphous ice. We find very similar scattering properties in the liquid and the ice for electron kinetic energies up to a few hundred electron volts. The scattering cross sections recommended here for liquid water are an extension of the amorphous ice cross sections. Within the framework of currently available experimental data, our work answers one of the most debated questions regarding electron scattering in liquid water.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access