Paper detail

Comment on: Is the Hydrated Electron Vertical Detachment Genuinely Bimodal?

In a recent article, David Bartels addresses the issue of the band shape of the genuine binding energy spectrum of the hydrated electron. He essentially claims that the genuine binding energy of the hydrated electron must be Gaussian in shape independent of the photon energy used for ionization, contrary to what was found in our previous work for excitations energies in the UV (3.6-5.8 eV photon energy). Further, he alleges that the asymmetric (bimodal) distribution found for the genuine binding energy in our previous work must have resulted from deficiencies in the scattering cross sections used in the scattering calculations. Bartels concludes that these deficiencies arise from an allegedly wrong value of -1.0eV for the escape barrier used in the original fitting procedure to determine the scattering cross section. In the following, we show that these claims are unfounded and based on partly incorrect assumptions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.