Paper detail

Can current experimental data exclude non-Gaussian genuine band shapes in ultraviolet photoelectron spectra of the hydrated electron?

Two recent articles present results that allegedly exclude a possible multimodal distribution of the hydrated electron in ultraviolet photoelectron spectra. The first article bases its conclusion on the assumption that the non-Gaussian genuine band shape previously retrieved for the solvated electron in liquid water is an artefact arising from insufficient electron scattering cross sections used in the retrieval. The second article excludes a multimodal band shape based on a photoelectron spectrum of the solvated electron in water clusters recorded at a single ultraviolet photon energy, and it further assumes that cluster results are transferable to the liquid without further justification. Here, we show that based on current data multimodal distributions cannot be unambiguously excluded. Furthermore, the transferability of cluster results to the liquid can neither be justified nor refuted on the basis of currently available experimental ultraviolet photoelectron spectra.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.