Source author record

Ruanui Nicholson

Ruanui Nicholson appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computation Machine Learning math.OC math.ST Statistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

5topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2021arXiv

Joint Estimation of Robin Coefficient and Domain Boundary for the Poisson Problem

We consider the problem of simultaneously inferring the heterogeneous coefficient field for a Robin boundary condition on an inaccessible part of the boundary along with the shape of the boundary for the Poisson problem. Such a problem arises in, for example, corrosion detection, and thermal parameter estimation. We carry out both linearised uncertainty quantification, based on a local Gaussian approximation, and full exploration of the joint posterior using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. By exploiting a known invariance property of the Poisson problem, we are able to circumvent the need to re-mesh as the shape of the boundary changes. The linearised uncertainty analysis presented here relies on a local linearisation of the parameter-to-observable map, with respect to both the Robin coefficient and the boundary shape, evaluated at the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimates. Computation of the MAP estimate is carried out using the Gauss-Newton method. On the other hand, to explore the full joint posterior we use the Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA), which requires the gradient of the log-posterior. We thus derive both the Fréchet derivative of the solution to the Poisson problem with respect to the Robin coefficient and the boundary shape, and the gradient of the log-posterior, which is efficiently computed using the so-called adjoint approach. The performance of the approach is demonstrated via several numerical experiments with simulated data.

preprint2020arXiv

What can be estimated? Identifiability, estimability, causal inference and ill-posed inverse problems

We consider basic conceptual questions concerning the relationship between statistical estimation and causal inference. Firstly, we show how to translate causal inference problems into an abstract statistical formalism without requiring any structure beyond an arbitrarily-indexed family of probability models. The formalism is simple but can incorporate a variety of causal modelling frameworks, including 'structural causal models', but also models expressed in terms of, e.g., differential equations. We focus primarily on the structural/graphical causal modelling literature, however. Secondly, we consider the extent to which causal and statistical concerns can be cleanly separated, examining the fundamental question: 'What can be estimated from data?'. We call this the problem of estimability. We approach this by analysing a standard formal definition of 'can be estimated' commonly adopted in the causal inference literature -- identifiability -- in our abstract statistical formalism. We use elementary category theory to show that identifiability implies the existence of a Fisher-consistent estimator, but also show that this estimator may be discontinuous, and thus unstable, in general. This difficulty arises because the causal inference problem is, in general, an ill-posed inverse problem. Inverse problems have three conditions which must be satisfied to be considered well-posed: existence, uniqueness, and stability of solutions. Here identifiability corresponds to the question of uniqueness; in contrast, we take estimability to mean satisfaction of all three conditions, i.e. well-posedness. Lack of stability implies that naive translation of a causally identifiable quantity into an achievable statistical estimation target may prove impossible. Our article is primarily expository and aimed at unifying ideas from multiple fields, though we provide new constructions and proofs.