Source author record

Ronald L. Rivest

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

5works
8topics
4close collaborators

Published work

5 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Leading the field: Fortune favors the bold in Thurstonian choice models

Schools with the highest average student performance are often the smallest schools; localities with the highest rates of some cancers are frequently small and the effects observed in clinical trials are likely to be largest for the smallest numbers of subjects. Informal explanations of this "small-schools phenomenon" point to the fact that the sample means of smaller samples have higher variances. But this cannot be a complete explanation: If we draw two samples from a diffuse distribution that is symmetric about some point, then the chance that the smaller sample has larger mean is 50\%. A particular consequence of results proved below is that if one draws three or more samples of different sizes from the same normal distribution, then the sample mean of the smallest sample is most likely to be highest, the sample mean of the second smallest sample is second most likely to be highest, and so on; this is true even though for any pair of samples, each one of the pair is equally likely to have the larger sample mean. Our conclusions are relevant to certain stochastic choice models including the following generalization of Thurstone's Law of Comparative Judgment. There are nn items. Item ii is preferred to item jj if Zi<ZjZ_i < Z_j, where ZZ is a random nn-vector of preference scores. Suppose P{Zi=Zj}=0\mathbb{P}\{Z_i = Z_j\} = 0 for i≠ji \ne j, so there are no ties. Item kk is the favorite if Zk<min⁡i≠kZiZ_k < \min_{i\ne k} Z_i. Let pip_i denote the chance that item ii is the favorite. We characterize a large class of distributions for ZZ for which p1>p2>⋯>pnp_1 > p_2 > \cdots > p_n. Our results are most surprising when P{Zi<Zj}=P{Zi>Zj}=12\mathbb{P}\{Z_i < Z_j\} = \mathbb{P}\{Z_i > Z_j\} = \frac{1}{2} for i≠ji \ne j, so neither of any two items is likely to be preferred over the other in a pairwise comparison.

preprint2015arXiv

DiffSum - A Simple Post-Election Risk-Limiting Audit

This paper presents DiffSum, a simple post-election risk-limiting ballot-polling audit for two-candidate plurality elections. DiffSum sequentially draws ballots (without replacement) until the numbers aa, bb, of votes for candidates AA, BB satisfies a>ba>b and (a−b)2>c(a+b)(a-b)^2 > c(a+b), where AA is the reported winner and cc is a suitably chosen constant. Bounds on the error rate (chance of approving an incorrect election outcome) are obtained via simulations. The method is compared with the Bravo method of Lindeman, Stark, and Yates.

preprint2014arXiv

Picture-Hanging Puzzles

We show how to hang a picture by wrapping rope around n nails, making a polynomial number of twists, such that the picture falls whenever any k out of the n nails get removed, and the picture remains hanging when fewer than k nails get removed. This construction makes for some fun mathematical magic performances. More generally, we characterize the possible Boolean functions characterizing when the picture falls in terms of which nails get removed as all monotone Boolean functions. This construction requires an exponential number of twists in the worst case, but exponential complexity is almost always necessary for general functions.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.