Source author record

Roberto Bruschini

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
1topics
3close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2026arXiv

Hidden-Heavy Pentaquarks and Where to Find Them

We provide a simple explanation for the observed hidden-charm pentaquarks as bound states in Born-Oppenheimer potentials. We identify Pccˉ(4312)+P_{c\bar{c}}(4312)^+, Pccˉ(4440)+P_{c\bar{c}}(4440)^+, and Pccˉ(4457)+P_{c\bar{c}}(4457)^+ as heavy-quark spin states in a quartet of ccˉc \bar{c} pentaquarks with JPJ^P quantum numbers 12−\frac{1}{2}^-, 32−\frac{3}{2}^-, and 52−\frac{5}{2}^-. The quantum numbers of Pccˉ(4457)+P_{c\bar{c}}(4457)^+ differ from most previous predictions. We also predict a fourth ccˉc\bar{c} pentaquark with quantum numbers 32−\frac{3}{2}^- near the Σc∗DˉΣ_c^\ast\bar{D} threshold. We identify Pccˉs(4338)0P_{c\bar{c}s}(4338)^0 and Pccˉs(4459)0P_{c\bar{c}s}(4459)^0 as heavy-quark spin states in a triplet of ccˉsc \bar{c}s pentaquarks with quantum numbers 12−\frac{1}{2}^- and either 12−\frac{1}{2}^- or 32−\frac{3}{2}^-. We also predict a third ccˉsc\bar{c}s pentaquark with quantum numbers either 32−\frac{3}{2}^- or 12−\frac{1}{2}^- near the ΞcDˉ∗Ξ_c\bar{D}^\ast threshold. We explain why the observed hidden-charm pentaquarks have narrow widths.

preprint2021arXiv

Strong decays of the lowest bottomonium hybrid within an extended Born-Oppenheimer framework

We analyze the decays of the theoretically predicted lowest bottomonium hybrid H(1P)H(1P) to open bottom two-meson states. We do it by embedding a quark pair creation model into the Born-Oppenheimer framework which allows for a unified, QCD-motivated description of bottomonium hybrids as well as bottomonium. A new 1 ⁣P1^{1}\!P_{1} decay model for H(1P)H(1P) comes out. The same analysis applied to bottomonium leads naturally to the well-known 3 ⁣P0^{3}\!P_{0} decay model. We show that H(1P)H(1P) and the theoretically predicted bottomonium state Υ(5S)Υ(5S), whose calculated masses are close to each other, have very different widths for such decays. A comparison with data from Υ(10860)Υ(10860), an experimental resonance whose mass is similar to that of Υ(5S)Υ(5S) and H(1P)H(1P), is carried out. Neither a Υ(5S)Υ(5S) nor a H(1P)H(1P) assignment can explain the measured decay widths. However, a Υ(5S)Υ(5S)-H(1P)H(1P) mixing may give account of them supporting previous analyses of dipion decays of Υ(10860)Υ(10860) and suggesting a possible experimental evidence of H(1P)H(1P).

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.