Source author record

Roberto Bruschini

Roberto Bruschini appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Hidden-Heavy Pentaquarks and Where to Find Them

We provide a simple explanation for the observed hidden-charm pentaquarks as bound states in Born-Oppenheimer potentials. We identify $P_{c\bar{c}}(4312)^+$, $P_{c\bar{c}}(4440)^+$, and $P_{c\bar{c}}(4457)^+$ as heavy-quark spin states in a quartet of $c \bar{c}$ pentaquarks with $J^P$ quantum numbers $\frac{1}{2}^-$, $\frac{3}{2}^-$, and $\frac{5}{2}^-$. The quantum numbers of $P_{c\bar{c}}(4457)^+$ differ from most previous predictions. We also predict a fourth $c\bar{c}$ pentaquark with quantum numbers $\frac{3}{2}^-$ near the $Σ_c^\ast\bar{D}$ threshold. We identify $P_{c\bar{c}s}(4338)^0$ and $P_{c\bar{c}s}(4459)^0$ as heavy-quark spin states in a triplet of $c \bar{c}s$ pentaquarks with quantum numbers $\frac{1}{2}^-$ and either $\frac{1}{2}^-$ or $\frac{3}{2}^-$. We also predict a third $c\bar{c}s$ pentaquark with quantum numbers either $\frac{3}{2}^-$ or $\frac{1}{2}^-$ near the $Ξ_c\bar{D}^\ast$ threshold. We explain why the observed hidden-charm pentaquarks have narrow widths.

preprint2021arXiv

Strong decays of the lowest bottomonium hybrid within an extended Born-Oppenheimer framework

We analyze the decays of the theoretically predicted lowest bottomonium hybrid $H(1P)$ to open bottom two-meson states. We do it by embedding a quark pair creation model into the Born-Oppenheimer framework which allows for a unified, QCD-motivated description of bottomonium hybrids as well as bottomonium. A new $^{1}\!P_{1}$ decay model for $H(1P)$ comes out. The same analysis applied to bottomonium leads naturally to the well-known $^{3}\!P_{0}$ decay model. We show that $H(1P)$ and the theoretically predicted bottomonium state $Υ(5S)$, whose calculated masses are close to each other, have very different widths for such decays. A comparison with data from $Υ(10860)$, an experimental resonance whose mass is similar to that of $Υ(5S)$ and $H(1P)$, is carried out. Neither a $Υ(5S)$ nor a $H(1P)$ assignment can explain the measured decay widths. However, a $Υ(5S)$-$H(1P)$ mixing may give account of them supporting previous analyses of dipion decays of $Υ(10860)$ and suggesting a possible experimental evidence of $H(1P)$.