Paper detail

Strong decays of the lowest bottomonium hybrid within an extended Born-Oppenheimer framework

We analyze the decays of the theoretically predicted lowest bottomonium hybrid $H(1P)$ to open bottom two-meson states. We do it by embedding a quark pair creation model into the Born-Oppenheimer framework which allows for a unified, QCD-motivated description of bottomonium hybrids as well as bottomonium. A new $^{1}\!P_{1}$ decay model for $H(1P)$ comes out. The same analysis applied to bottomonium leads naturally to the well-known $^{3}\!P_{0}$ decay model. We show that $H(1P)$ and the theoretically predicted bottomonium state $Υ(5S)$, whose calculated masses are close to each other, have very different widths for such decays. A comparison with data from $Υ(10860)$, an experimental resonance whose mass is similar to that of $Υ(5S)$ and $H(1P)$, is carried out. Neither a $Υ(5S)$ nor a $H(1P)$ assignment can explain the measured decay widths. However, a $Υ(5S)$-$H(1P)$ mixing may give account of them supporting previous analyses of dipion decays of $Υ(10860)$ and suggesting a possible experimental evidence of $H(1P)$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.