BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Renato Calleja

Renato Calleja contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.DSnlin.CD

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

KAM estimates for the dissipative standard map

From the beginning of KAM theory, it was realized that its applicability to realistic problems depended on developing quantitative estimates on the sizes of the perturbations allowed. In this paper we present results on the existence of quasi-periodic solutions for conformally symplectic systems in non-perturbative regimes. We recall that, for conformally symplectic systems, finding the solution requires also to find a "drift parameter". We present a proof on the existence of solutions for values of the parameters which agree with more than three figures with the numerically conjectured optimal values. The verification of the estimates presented here is not completely rigorous since we do not control the round-off error. Nevertheless, running with different precision shows very little difference in the results. Given the high precision of the calculation and the simplicity of the estimates, this does not seem to affect the results. A full verification should be done implementing interval arithmetic. We make available the approximate solutions, the highly efficient algorithms to generate them (incorporating high precision based on the MPFR library) and the routines used to verify the applicability of the theorem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

KAM theory for some dissipative systems

Dissipative systems play a very important role in several physical models, most notably in Celestial Mechanics, where the dissipation drives the motion of natural and artificial satellites, leading them to migration of orbits, resonant states, etc. Hence the need to develop theories that ensure the existence of structures such as invariant tori or periodic orbits and device efficient computational methods. In this work we concentrate on the existence of invariant tori for the specific case of dissipative systems known as "conformally symplectic" systems, which have the property that they transform the symplectic form into a multiple of itself. To give explicit examples of conformally symplectic systems, we will present two different models: a discrete system, the standard map, and a continuous system, the spin-orbit problem. In both cases we will consider the conservative and dissipative versions, that will help to highlight the differences between the symplectic and conformally symplectic dynamics. For such dissipative systems we will present a KAM theorem in an a-posteriori format. The method of proof is based on extending geometric identities originally developed in [39] for the symplectic case. Besides leading to streamlined proofs of KAM theorem, this method provides a very efficient algorithm which has been implemented. Coupling an efficient numerical algorithm with an a-posteriori theorem, we have a very efficient way to provide rigorous estimates close to optimal. Indeed, the method gives a criterion (the Sobolev blow up criterion) that allows to compute numerically the breakdown. We will review this method as well as an extension of J. Greene's method and present the results in the conservative and dissipative standard maps. Computing close to the breakdown, allows to discover new mathematical phenomena such as the "bundle collapse mechanism".

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Non-twist tori in conformally symplectic systems

Dissipative mechanical systems on the torus with a friction that is proportional to the velocity are modeled by conformally symplectic maps on the annulus, which are maps that transport the symplectic form into a multiple of itself (with a conformal factor smaller than 1). It is important to understand the structure and the dynamics on the attractors. With the aid of parameters, and under suitable non-degeneracy conditions, one can obtain that, by adjusting parameters, there is an attractor that is an invariant torus whose internal dynamics is conjugate to a rotation [CCdlL13]. By analogy with symplectic dynamics, there have been some debate in establishing appropriate definitions for twist and non-twist invariant tori (or systems). The purpose of this paper is two-fold: (a) to establish proper definitions of twist and non-twist invariant tori in families of conformally symplectic systems; (b) to derive algorithms of computation of non-twist invariant tori. The last part of the paper is devoted to implementations of the algorithms, illustrating the definitions presented in this paper, and exploring the mechanisms of breakdown of non-twist tori. For the sake of simplicity we have considered here 2D systems, i.e. defined in the 2D annulus, but generalization to higher dimensions is straightforward.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access