Paper detail

KAM estimates for the dissipative standard map

From the beginning of KAM theory, it was realized that its applicability to realistic problems depended on developing quantitative estimates on the sizes of the perturbations allowed. In this paper we present results on the existence of quasi-periodic solutions for conformally symplectic systems in non-perturbative regimes. We recall that, for conformally symplectic systems, finding the solution requires also to find a "drift parameter". We present a proof on the existence of solutions for values of the parameters which agree with more than three figures with the numerically conjectured optimal values. The verification of the estimates presented here is not completely rigorous since we do not control the round-off error. Nevertheless, running with different precision shows very little difference in the results. Given the high precision of the calculation and the simplicity of the estimates, this does not seem to affect the results. A full verification should be done implementing interval arithmetic. We make available the approximate solutions, the highly efficient algorithms to generate them (incorporating high precision based on the MPFR library) and the routines used to verify the applicability of the theorem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.