Source author record

Ralf M. Haefner

Ralf M. Haefner appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Interpolating between sampling and variational inference with infinite stochastic mixtures

Sampling and Variational Inference (VI) are two large families of methods for approximate inference that have complementary strengths. Sampling methods excel at approximating arbitrary probability distributions, but can be inefficient. VI methods are efficient, but may misrepresent the true distribution. Here, we develop a general framework where approximations are stochastic mixtures of simple component distributions. Both sampling and VI can be seen as special cases: in sampling, each mixture component is a delta-function and is chosen stochastically, while in standard VI a single component is chosen to minimize divergence. We derive a practical method that interpolates between sampling and VI by solving an optimization problem over a mixing distribution. Intermediate inference methods then arise by varying a single parameter. Our method provably improves on sampling (reducing variance) and on VI (reducing bias+variance despite increasing variance). We demonstrate our method's bias/variance trade-off in practice on reference problems, and we compare outcomes to commonly used sampling and VI methods. This work takes a step towards a highly flexible yet simple family of inference methods that combines the complementary strengths of sampling and VI.

preprint2015arXiv

A note on choice and detect probabilities in the presence of choice bias

Recently we have presented the analytical relationship between choice probabilities, noise correlations and read-out weights in the classical feedforward decision-making framework (Haefner et al. 2013). The derivation assumed that behavioral reports are distributed evenly between the two possible choices. This assumption is often violated in empirical data - especially when computing so-called grand CPs combining data across stimulus conditions. Here, we extend our analytical results to situations when subjects show clear biases towards one choice over the other, e.g. in non-zero signal conditions. Importantly, this also extends our results from discrimination tasks to detection tasks and detect probabilities for which much empirical data is available. We find that CPs and DPs depend monotonously on the fraction, p, of choices assigned to the more likely option: CPs and DPs are smallest for p equal to 0.5 and increase as p increases, i.e. as the data deviates from the ideal, zero-signal, unbiased scenario. While this deviation is small, our results suggest a) an empirical test for the feedforward framework and b) a way in which to correct choice probability and detect probability measurements before combining different stimulus conditions to increase signal/noise.

preprint2015arXiv

The implications of perception as probabilistic inference for correlated neural variability during behavior

This paper addresses two main challenges facing systems neuroscience today: understanding the nature and function of a) cortical feedback between sensory areas and b) correlated variability. Starting from the old idea of perception as probabilistic inference, we show how to use knowledge of the psychophysical task to make easily testable predictions for the impact that feedback signals have on early sensory representations. Applying our framework to the well-studied two-alternative forced choice task paradigm, we can explain multiple empirical findings that have been hard to account for by the traditional feedforward model of sensory processing, including the task-dependence of neural response correlations, and the diverging time courses of choice probabilities and psychophysical kernels. Our model makes a number of new predictions and, importantly, characterizes a component of correlated variability that represents task-related information rather than performance-degrading noise. It also demonstrates a normative way to integrate sensory and cognitive components into physiologically testable mathematical models of perceptual decision-making.