BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Rajiv Gupta

Rajiv Gupta contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer Visioneess.IVhep-exhep-phMachine Learningphysics.ins-det

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Effect of hole pitch reduction on electron transport and diffusion: A comparative simulation study of Triple GEM detectors

Advances in fabrication techniques and high-performance electronics have facilitated the development of fine-pitch Gas Electron Multipliers (GEMs). Earlier experimental and simulation findings suggest that these reduced-pitch GEMs can outperform the standard configuration in terms of effective gain, collection efficiency, and position resolution. However, a noticeable fraction of avalanche electrons is lost within the GEM systems, resulting in a degradation of charge collection efficiency. Therefore, a comprehensive simulation-based study is essential to provide deeper insights into the extent of degradation and its contributing factors. In this context, we employ ANSYS and Garfield++ to model the Triple GEM detectors with reduced pitch sizes of 90 and 60 $μ$m, and perform a comparative performance analysis with the standard configuration (pitch size: 140 $μ$m). At first, the simulation framework is validated by comparing the results of the standard configuration with available experimental data and previously reported simulation outcomes. Despite the characteristic gain offset, the framework remains physically consistent and reliable in capturing microscopic avalanche dynamics, reproducing the experimental trend. Following validation, we investigate electron losses at the metal electrodes and within the Kapton holes, electron transmission through the transfer and induction regions, electron diffusion on the induction electrode, and the overall collection efficiency. These parameters are analyzed as functions of GEM potential, outer hole diameter, inner hole diameter, Kapton thickness, metal thickness, and gas composition, thereby offering insights for designing efficient GEM detectors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2025arXiv

Study of Heavy Hadron Production in Au + Au Collisions at a Center-of-Mass Energy of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV

Using the Monte Carlo HYDJET++ model, the transverse momentum ($p_{T}$) spectra of heavy hadrons ($D^{0}$, $\overline{D}^{0}$, $D^{+}$, $D^{-}$ and $Λ_{c}$), as well as the nuclear modification factors of $D^{0}$ and $D^{\pm}$, produced in Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV RHIC energy across various centrality bins, are presented. This study is motivated by the need to understand the centrality dependence of the charm enhancement factor ($γ_{c}$) and the roles of different hadronization mechanisms such as coalescence and fragmentation, in charm hadron production. To achieve the best description of heavy hadron production, several input parameters in both the soft and hard components of the model are tuned. The study finds a decreasing trend of $γ_{c}$ from central to peripheral collisions and a mass dependence across charm hadrons. Moreover, the model effectively reproduces experimental data of $p_{T}$ spectra at low and intermediate $p_{T}$, capturing key features of charm hadron production in the quark-gluon plasma medium. However, it overpredicts the data at high $p_{T}$, indicating the need for improvements in modeling heavy quark energy loss mechanisms. Further, the nuclear modification factors ($R_{AA}$ and $R_{CP}$) for $D^{0}$ mesons exhibit significant suppression in central collisions, which matches with experimental observations. This highlights the roles of collisional and radiative energy loss due to collective effects, such as coalescence and radial flow. The antiparticle-to-particle and mixed particle ratios are also presented, showing good agreement with experimental data and revealing limitations in baryon production due to the absence of heavy quark coalescence in HYDJET++.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Generalizability of Machine Learning Models: Quantitative Evaluation of Three Methodological Pitfalls

Purpose: Despite the potential of machine learning models, the lack of generalizability has hindered their widespread adoption in clinical practice. We investigate three methodological pitfalls: (1) violation of independence assumption, (2) model evaluation with an inappropriate performance indicator or baseline for comparison, and (3) batch effect. Materials and Methods: Using several retrospective datasets, we implement machine learning models with and without the pitfalls to quantitatively illustrate these pitfalls' effect on model generalizability. Results: Violation of independence assumption, more specifically, applying oversampling, feature selection, and data augmentation before splitting data into train, validation, and test sets, respectively, led to misleading and superficial gains in F1 scores of 71.2% in predicting local recurrence and 5.0% in predicting 3-year overall survival in head and neck cancer as well as 46.0% in distinguishing histopathological patterns in lung cancer. Further, randomly distributing data points for a subject across training, validation, and test sets led to a 21.8% superficial increase in F1 score. Also, we showed the importance of the choice of performance measures and baseline for comparison. In the presence of batch effect, a model built for pneumonia detection led to F1 score of 98.7%. However, when the same model was applied to a new dataset of normal patients, it only correctly classified 3.86% of the samples. Conclusions: These methodological pitfalls cannot be captured using internal model evaluation, and the inaccurate predictions made by such models may lead to wrong conclusions and interpretations. Therefore, understanding and avoiding these pitfalls is necessary for developing generalizable models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access