BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Radu Calinescu

Radu Calinescu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Software EngineeringMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceFormal Languages and Automata TheoryRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

PRESTO: Predicting System-level Disruptions through Parametric Model Checking

Self-adaptive systems are expected to mitigate disruptions by continually adjusting their configuration and behaviour. This mitigation is often reactive. Typically, environmental or internal changes trigger a system response only after a violation of the system requirements. Despite a broad agreement that prevention is better than cure in self-adaptation, proactive adaptation methods are underrepresented within the repertoire of solutions available to the developers of self-adaptive systems. To address this gap, we present a work-in-progress approach for the pre diction of system-level disruptions (PRESTO) through parametric model checking. Intended for use in the analysis step of the MAPE-K (Monitor-Analyse-Plan-Execute over a shared Knowledge) feedback control loop of self-adaptive systems, PRESTO comprises two stages. First, time-series analysis is applied to monitoring data in order to identify trends in the values of individual system and/or environment parameters. Next, future non-functional requirement violations are predicted by using parametric model checking, in order to establish the potential impact of these trends on the reliability and performance of the system. We illustrate the application of PRESTO in a case study from the autonomous farming domain.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

DeepCert: Verification of Contextually Relevant Robustness for Neural Network Image Classifiers

We introduce DeepCert, a tool-supported method for verifying the robustness of deep neural network (DNN) image classifiers to contextually relevant perturbations such as blur, haze, and changes in image contrast. While the robustness of DNN classifiers has been the subject of intense research in recent years, the solutions delivered by this research focus on verifying DNN robustness to small perturbations in the images being classified, with perturbation magnitude measured using established Lp norms. This is useful for identifying potential adversarial attacks on DNN image classifiers, but cannot verify DNN robustness to contextually relevant image perturbations, which are typically not small when expressed with Lp norms. DeepCert addresses this underexplored verification problem by supporting:(1) the encoding of real-world image perturbations; (2) the systematic evaluation of contextually relevant DNN robustness, using both testing and formal verification; (3) the generation of contextually relevant counterexamples; and, through these, (4) the selection of DNN image classifiers suitable for the operational context (i)envisaged when a potentially safety-critical system is designed, or (ii)observed by a deployed system. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DeepCert by showing how it can be used to verify the robustness of DNN image classifiers build for two benchmark datasets (`German Traffic Sign' and `CIFAR-10') to multiple contextually relevant perturbations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Fast Parametric Model Checking through Model Fragmentation

Parametric model checking (PMC) computes algebraic formulae that express key non-functional properties of a system (reliability, performance, etc.) as rational functions of the system and environment parameters. In software engineering, PMC formulae can be used during design, e.g., to analyse the sensitivity of different system architectures to parametric variability, or to find optimal system configurations. They can also be used at runtime, e.g., to check if non-functional requirements are still satisfied after environmental changes, or to select new configurations after such changes. However, current PMC techniques do not scale well to systems with complex behaviour and more than a few parameters. Our paper introduces a fast PMC (fPMC) approach that overcomes this limitation, extending the applicability of PMC to a broader class of systems than previously possible. To this end, fPMC partitions the Markov models that PMC operates with into \emph{fragments} whose reachability properties are analysed independently, and obtains PMC reachability formulae by combining the results of these fragment analyses. To demonstrate the effectiveness of fPMC, we show how our fPMC tool can analyse three systems (taken from the research literature, and belonging to different application domains) with which current PMC techniques and tools struggle.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Guidance on the Assurance of Machine Learning in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS)

Machine Learning (ML) is now used in a range of systems with results that are reported to exceed, under certain conditions, human performance. Many of these systems, in domains such as healthcare , automotive and manufacturing, exhibit high degrees of autonomy and are safety critical. Establishing justified confidence in ML forms a core part of the safety case for these systems. In this document we introduce a methodology for the Assurance of Machine Learning for use in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS). AMLAS comprises a set of safety case patterns and a process for (1) systematically integrating safety assurance into the development of ML components and (2) for generating the evidence base for explicitly justifying the acceptable safety of these components when integrated into autonomous system applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Uncertainty in Self-Adaptive Systems: A Research Community Perspective

One of the primary drivers for self-adaptation is ensuring that systems achieve their goals regardless of the uncertainties they face during operation. Nevertheless, the concept of uncertainty in self-adaptive systems is still insufficiently understood. Several taxonomies of uncertainty have been proposed, and a substantial body of work exists on methods to tame uncertainty. Yet, these taxonomies and methods do not fully convey the research community's perception on what constitutes uncertainty in self-adaptive systems and how to tackle it. To understand this perception and learn from it, we conducted a survey comprising two complementary stages. In the first stage, we focused on current research and development. In the second stage, we focused on directions for future research. The key findings of the first stage are: a) an overview of uncertainty sources considered in self-adaptive systems, b) an overview of existing methods used to tackle uncertainty in concrete applications, c) insights into the impact of uncertainty on non-functional requirements, d) insights into different opinions in the perception of uncertainty within the community, and the need for standardised uncertainty-handling processes to facilitate uncertainty management in self-adaptive systems. The key findings of the second stage are: a) the insight that over 70% of the participants believe that self-adaptive systems can be engineered to cope with unanticipated change, b) a set of potential approaches for dealing with unanticipated change, c) a set of open challenges in mitigating uncertainty in self-adaptive systems, in particular in those with safety-critical requirements. From these findings, we outline an initial reference process to manage uncertainty in self-adaptive systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access