Source author record

R. Fioresi

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

18works
13topics
4close collaborators

Published work

18 publications

preprint2020arXiv

Highest weight Harish-Chandra supermodules and their geometric realizations

In this paper we discuss the highest weight kr\frak k_r-finite representations of the pair (gr,kr)(\frak g_r,\frak k_r) consisting of gr\frak g_r, a real form of a complex basic Lie superalgebra of classical type g\frak g (g≠A(n,n){\frak g}\neq A(n,n)), and the maximal compact subalgebra kr\frak k_r of gr,0\frak g_{r,0}, together with their geometric global realizations. These representations occur, as in the ordinary setting, in the superspaces of sections of holomorphic super vector bundles on the associated Hermitian superspaces Gr/KrG_r/K_r.

preprint2019arXiv

A geometric interpretation of stochastic gradient descent using diffusion metrics

Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is a key ingredient in the training of deep neural networks and yet its geometrical significance appears elusive. We study a deterministic model in which the trajectories of our dynamical systems are described via geodesics of a family of metrics arising from the diffusion matrix. These metrics encode information about the highly non-isotropic gradient noise in SGD. We establish a parallel with General Relativity models, where the role of the electromagnetic field is played by the gradient of the loss function. We compute an example of a two layer network.

preprint2015arXiv

The Peter-Weyl Theorem for SU(1|1)

We study a generalization of the results \in \cite{cfk} to the case of SU(1∣1)SU(1|1) interpreted as the supercircle S1∣2S^{1|2}. We describe all of its finite dimensional complex irreducible representations, we give a reducibility result for representations not containing the trivial character, and we compute explicitly the corresponding matrix elements. In the end we give the Peter-Weyl theorem for S1∣2S^{1|2}.

preprint2014arXiv

SUSY structures, representations and Peter-Weyl theorem for S1∣1S^{1|1}

The real compact supergroup S1∣1S^{1|1} is analized from different perspectives and its representation theory is studied. We prove it is the only (up to isomorphism) supergroup, which is a real form of (C1∣1)×({\mathbf C}^{1|1})^\times with reduced Lie group S1S^1, and a link with SUSY structures on C1∣1{\mathbf C}^{1|1} is established. We describe a large family of complex semisimple representations of S1∣1S^{1|1} and we show that any S1∣1S^{1|1}-representation whose weights are all nonzero is a direct sum of members of our family. We also compute the matrix elements of the members of this family and we give a proof of the Peter-Weyl theorem for S1∣1S^{1|1}.

preprint2012arXiv

Quadratic deformation of Minkowski space

We present a deformation of the Minkowski space as embedded into the conformal space (in the formalism of twistors) based in the quantum versions of the corresponding kinematic groups. We compute explicitly the star product, whose Poisson bracket is quadratic. We show that the star product although defined on the polynomials can be extended differentiably. Finally we compute the Eucliden and Minkowskian real forms of the deformation.

preprint2011arXiv

Chevalley Supergroups

In the framework of algebraic supergeometry, we give a construction of the scheme-theoretic supergeometric analogue of Chevalley groups, namely affine algebraic supergroups associated to simple Lie superalgebras of classical type. In particular both basic (even exceptional) and strange cases are covered. This provides a unified approach to most of the algebraic supergroups considered so far in literature, and an effective method to construct new ones. As an intermediate step, we prove an existence theorem for Chevalley bases of simple classical Lie superalgebras and a PBW-like theorem for their associated Kostant superalgebras.

preprint2010arXiv

On the construction of Chevalley Supergroups

We give a description of the construction of Chevalley supergroups, providing some explanatory examples. We avoid the discussion of the A(1,1)A(1,1), P(3)P(3) and Q(n)Q(n) cases, for which our construction holds, but the exposition becomes more complicated. We shall not in general provide complete proofs for our statements, instead we will make an effort to convey the key ideas underlying our construction. A fully detailed account of our work is scheduled to appear later.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.