BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Pranamesh Chakraborty

Pranamesh Chakraborty contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer VisionApplicationsDatabasesMachine Learningphysics.soc-phstat.OT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Sugar and Stops in Drivers with Insulin-Dependent Type 1 Diabetes

Diabetes is a major public health challenge worldwide. Abnormal physiology in diabetes, particularly hypoglycemia, can cause driver impairments that affect safe driving. While diabetes driver safety has been previously researched, few studies link real-time physiologic changes in drivers with diabetes to objective real-world driver safety, particularly at high-risk areas like intersections. To address this, we investigated the role of acute physiologic changes in drivers with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) on safe stopping at stop intersections. 18 T1DM drivers (21-52 years, mean = 31.2 years) and 14 controls (21-55 years, mean = 33.4 years) participated in a 4-week naturalistic driving study. At induction, each participant's vehicle was fitted with a camera and sensor system to collect driving data. Video was processed with computer vision algorithms detecting traffic elements. Stop intersections were geolocated with clustering methods, state intersection databases, and manual review. Videos showing driver stop intersection approaches were extracted and manually reviewed to classify stopping behavior (full, rolling, and no stop) and intersection traffic characteristics. Mixed-effects logistic regression models determined how diabetes driver stopping safety (safe vs. unsafe stop) was affected by 1) disease and 2) at-risk, acute physiology (hypo- and hyperglycemia). Diabetes drivers who were acutely hyperglycemic had 2.37 increased odds of unsafe stopping (95% CI: 1.26-4.47, p = 0.008) compared to those with normal physiology. Acute hypoglycemia did not associate with unsafe stopping (p = 0.537), however the lower frequency of hypoglycemia (vs. hyperglycemia) warrants a larger sample of drivers to investigate this effect. Critically, presence of diabetes alone did not associate with unsafe stopping, underscoring the need to evaluate driver physiology in licensing guidelines.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The 6th AI City Challenge

The 6th edition of the AI City Challenge specifically focuses on problems in two domains where there is tremendous unlocked potential at the intersection of computer vision and artificial intelligence: Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS), and brick and mortar retail businesses. The four challenge tracks of the 2022 AI City Challenge received participation requests from 254 teams across 27 countries. Track 1 addressed city-scale multi-target multi-camera (MTMC) vehicle tracking. Track 2 addressed natural-language-based vehicle track retrieval. Track 3 was a brand new track for naturalistic driving analysis, where the data were captured by several cameras mounted inside the vehicle focusing on driver safety, and the task was to classify driver actions. Track 4 was another new track aiming to achieve retail store automated checkout using only a single view camera. We released two leader boards for submissions based on different methods, including a public leader board for the contest, where no use of external data is allowed, and a general leader board for all submitted results. The top performance of participating teams established strong baselines and even outperformed the state-of-the-art in the proposed challenge tracks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Massively Parallelizable Approach for Evaluating Signalized Arterial Performance Using Probe-based data

The effective performance of arterial corridors is essential to community safety and vitality. Managing this performance, considering the dynamic nature of demand requires updating traffic signal timings through various strategies. Agency resources for these activities are commonly scarce and are primarily by public complaints. This paper provides a data-driven prioritization approach for traffic signal re-timing on a corridor. In order to remove any dependence on available detection, probe-based data are used for assessing the performance measures. Probe-based data are derived from in-vehicle global positioning system observations, eliminating the need for installing on-field traffic infrastructure. The paper provides a workflow to measure and compare different segments on arterial corridors in terms of probe-based signal performance measures that capture different aspects of signal operations. The proposed method can serve as a tool to guide agencies looking to alter their signal control. The methodology identifies a group of dynamic days followed by evaluation of travel rate based upon non-dynamic days. Dynamic days represent the variability of traffic on a segment. Performance measures on non-dynamic days include Median Travel Rate, Within-Day Variability of travel rate, between-days variability of travel rate Minimum Travel Rate Dispersion, and two variables which include Overall Travel Rate Variabilities. Consequently, a corridor having high number of dynamic segments along with poor performance during normal days would be a candidate for adaptive control. A case study was conducted on 11 corridors within Des Moines, Iowa where Merle Hay Road and University Avenue were identified suitable for adaptive control.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The 4th AI City Challenge

The AI City Challenge was created to accelerate intelligent video analysis that helps make cities smarter and safer. Transportation is one of the largest segments that can benefit from actionable insights derived from data captured by sensors, where computer vision and deep learning have shown promise in achieving large-scale practical deployment. The 4th annual edition of the AI City Challenge has attracted 315 participating teams across 37 countries, who leveraged city-scale real traffic data and high-quality synthetic data to compete in four challenge tracks. Track 1 addressed video-based automatic vehicle counting, where the evaluation is conducted on both algorithmic effectiveness and computational efficiency. Track 2 addressed city-scale vehicle re-identification with augmented synthetic data to substantially increase the training set for the task. Track 3 addressed city-scale multi-target multi-camera vehicle tracking. Track 4 addressed traffic anomaly detection. The evaluation system shows two leader boards, in which a general leader board shows all submitted results, and a public leader board shows results limited to our contest participation rules, that teams are not allowed to use external data in their work. The public leader board shows results more close to real-world situations where annotated data are limited. Our results show promise that AI technology can enable smarter and safer transportation systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access