BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Prabhanjan Ananth

Prabhanjan Ananth appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational ComplexityCryptography and SecurityDiscrete Mathematicsquant-phMachine Learningmath.CO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Note on Copy-Protection from Random Oracles

Quantum copy-protection, introduced by Aaronson (CCC'09), uses the no-cloning principle of quantum mechanics to protect software from being illegally distributed. Constructing copy-protection has been an important problem in quantum cryptography. Since copy-protection is shown to be impossible to achieve in the plain model, we investigate the question of constructing copy-protection for arbitrary classes of unlearnable functions in the random oracle model. We present an impossibility result that rules out a class of copy-protection schemes in the random oracle model assuming the existence of quantum fully homomorphic encryption and quantum hardness of learning with errors. En route, we prove the impossibility of approximately correct copy-protection in the plain model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Cryptography from Pseudorandom Quantum States

Pseudorandom states, introduced by Ji, Liu and Song (Crypto'18), are efficiently-computable quantum states that are computationally indistinguishable from Haar-random states. One-way functions imply the existence of pseudorandom states, but Kretschmer (TQC'20) recently constructed an oracle relative to which there are no one-way functions but pseudorandom states still exist. Motivated by this, we study the intriguing possibility of basing interesting cryptographic tasks on pseudorandom states. We construct, assuming the existence of pseudorandom state generators that map a $λ$-bit seed to a $ω(\logλ)$-qubit state, (a) statistically binding and computationally hiding commitments and (b) pseudo one-time encryption schemes. A consequence of (a) is that pseudorandom states are sufficient to construct maliciously secure multiparty computation protocols in the dishonest majority setting. Our constructions are derived via a new notion called pseudorandom function-like states (PRFS), a generalization of pseudorandom states that parallels the classical notion of pseudorandom functions. Beyond the above two applications, we believe our notion can effectively replace pseudorandom functions in many other cryptographic applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the Feasibility of Unclonable Encryption, and More

Unclonable encryption, first introduced by Broadbent and Lord (TQC'20), is a one-time encryption scheme with the following security guarantee: any non-local adversary (A, B, C) cannot simultaneously distinguish encryptions of two equal length messages. This notion is termed as unclonable indistinguishability. Prior works focused on achieving a weaker notion of unclonable encryption, where we required that any non-local adversary (A, B, C) cannot simultaneously recover the entire message m. Seemingly innocuous, understanding the feasibility of encryption schemes satisfying unclonable indistinguishability (even for 1-bit messages) has remained elusive. We make progress towards establishing the feasibility of unclonable encryption. - We show that encryption schemes satisfying unclonable indistinguishability exist unconditionally in the quantum random oracle model. - Towards understanding the necessity of oracles, we present a negative result stipulating that a large class of encryption schemes cannot satisfy unclonable indistinguishability. - Finally, we also establish the feasibility of another closely related primitive: copy-protection for single-bit output point functions. Prior works only established the feasibility of copy-protection for multi-bit output point functions or they achieved constant security error for single-bit output point functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Accelerating 2PC-based ML with Limited Trusted Hardware

This paper describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of Otak, a system that allows two non-colluding cloud providers to run machine learning (ML) inference without knowing the inputs to inference. Prior work for this problem mostly relies on advanced cryptography such as two-party secure computation (2PC) protocols that provide rigorous guarantees but suffer from high resource overhead. Otak improves efficiency via a new 2PC protocol that (i) tailors recent primitives such as function and homomorphic secret sharing to ML inference, and (ii) uses trusted hardware in a limited capacity to bootstrap the protocol. At the same time, Otak reduces trust assumptions on trusted hardware by running a small code inside the hardware, restricting its use to a preprocessing step, and distributing trust over heterogeneous trusted hardware platforms from different vendors. An implementation and evaluation of Otak demonstrates that its CPU and network overhead converted to a dollar amount is 5.4$-$385$\times$ lower than state-of-the-art 2PC-based works. Besides, Otak's trusted computing base (code inside trusted hardware) is only 1,300 lines of code, which is 14.6$-$29.2$\times$ lower than the code-size in prior trusted hardware-based works.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

An Algebraic Characterization of Rainbow Connectivity

The use of algebraic techniques to solve combinatorial problems is studied in this paper. We formulate the rainbow connectivity problem as a system of polynomial equations. We first consider the case of two colors for which the problem is known to be hard and we then extend the approach to the general case. We also give a formulation of the rainbow connectivity problem as an ideal membership problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Hardness and Parameterized Algorithms on Rainbow Connectivity problem

A path in an edge colored graph is said to be a rainbow path if no two edges on the path have the same color. An edge colored graph is (strongly) rainbow connected if there exists a (geodesic) rainbow path between every pair of vertices. The (strong) rainbow connectivity of a graph G, denoted by (src(G), respectively) rc(G) is the smallest number of colors required to edge color the graph such that G is (strongly) rainbow connected. In this paper we study the rainbow connectivity problem and the strong rainbow connectivity problem from a computational point of view. Our main results can be summarised as below: 1) For every fixed k >= 3, it is NP-Complete to decide whether src(G) <= k even when the graph G is bipartite. 2) For every fixed odd k >= 3, it is NP-Complete to decide whether rc(G) <= k. This resolves one of the open problems posed by Chakraborty et al. (J. Comb. Opt., 2011) where they prove the hardness for the even case. 3) The following problem is fixed parameter tractable: Given a graph G, determine the maximum number of pairs of vertices that can be rainbow connected using two colors. 4) For a directed graph G, it is NP-Complete to decide whether rc(G) <= 2.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

New Hardness Results in Rainbow Connectivity

A path in an edge colored graph is said to be a rainbow path if no two edges on the path have the same color. An edge colored graph is (strongly) rainbow connected if there exists a (geodesic) rainbow path between every pair of vertices. The (strong) rainbow connectivity of a graph $G$, denoted by ($src(G)$, respectively) $rc(G)$ is the smallest number of colors required to edge color the graph such that the graph is (strong) rainbow connected. It is known that for \emph{even} $k$ to decide whether the rainbow connectivity of a graph is at most $k$ or not is NP-hard. It was conjectured that for all $k$, to decide whether $rc(G) \leq k$ is NP-hard. In this paper we prove this conjecture. We also show that it is NP-hard to decide whether $src(G) \leq k$ or not even when $G$ is a bipartite graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On Gröbner Basis Detection for Zero-dimensional Ideals

The Gröbner basis detection (GBD) is defined as follows: Given a set of polynomials, decide whether there exists -and if "yes" find- a term order such that the set of polynomials is a Gröbner basis. This problem was shown to be NP-hard by Sturmfels and Wiegelmann. We show that GBD when studied in the context of zero dimensional ideals is also NP-hard. An algorithm to solve GBD for zero dimensional ideals is also proposed which runs in polynomial time if the number of indeterminates is a constant.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access