BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Meghana Nasre

Meghana Nasre contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematicsmath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Envy-free matchings with cost-controlled quotas

We consider the problem of assigning agents to programs in the presence of two-sided preferences, commonly known as the Hospital Residents problem. In the standard setting each program has a rigid upper-quota which cannot be violated. Motivated by applications where quotas are governed by resource availability, we propose and study the problem of computing optimal matchings with cost-controlled quotas -- denoted as the CCQ setting. In the CCQ setting we have a cost associated with every program which denotes the cost of matching a single agent to the program. Our goal is to compute a matching that matches all agents, respects the preference lists of agents and programs and is optimal with respect to the cost criteria. We consider envy-freeness as a notion of optimality and study two optimization problems with respect to the costs -- minimize the total cost (MINSUM) and minimize the maximum cost at a program (MINMAX). We show that there is a sharp contrast in the complexity status of these two problems -- MINMAX is polynomial time solvable whereas MINSUM is NP-hard and hard to approximate within a constant factor unless P = NP even under severe restrictions. On the positive side, we present approximation algorithms for the MINSUM for the general case and a special hard case. We chieve the approximation guarantee for the special case via a technically involved linear programming (LP) based algorithm. We remark that our LP is for the general case of the problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Envy-freeness and Relaxed Stability under lower quotas

We consider the problem of matchings under two-sided preferences in the presence of maximum as well as minimum quota requirements for the agents. This setting, studied as the Hospital Residents with Lower Quotas (HRLQ) in literature, models important real world problems like assigning medical interns (residents) to hospitals, and teaching assistants to instructors where a minimum guarantee is essential. When there are no minimum quotas, stability is the de-facto notion of optimality. However, in the presence of minimum quotas, ensuring stability and simultaneously satisfying lower quotas is not an attainable goal in many instances. To address this, a relaxation of stability known as envy-freeness, is proposed in literature. In our work, we thoroughly investigate envy-freeness from a computational view point. Our results show that computing envy-free matchings that match maximum number of agents is computationally hard and also hard to approximate up to a constant factor. Additionally, it is known that envy-free matchings satisfying lower-quotas may not exist. To circumvent these drawbacks, we propose a new notion called relaxed stability. We show that relaxed stable matchings are guaranteed to exist even in the presence of lower-quotas. Despite the computational intractability of finding a largest matching that is feasible and relaxed stable, we give efficient algorithms that compute a constant factor approximation to this matching in terms of size.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Trade-offs in dynamic coloring for bipartite and general graphs

We present trade-offs in the incremental and fully dynamic settings to maintian a proper coloring. For any fully dynamic $2$-coloring algorithm, the maximum of the update time, number of recolorings, and query time is $Ω(\log n)$. We present a deterministic fully dynamic $2$-coloring algorithm with $O(\log^2 n)$ amortized update time, $O(\log n)$ amortized query time, and one recoloring in the worst case. For any incremental $2$-coloring algorithm which explicitly maintains the color of every vertex after each update, the amortized update time and the amortized number of recolorings is $Ω(\log n)$. For such an algorithm, in the worst case the update time and the number of recolorings is $Ω(n)$. We then design a deterministic incremental $2$-coloring algorithm which explicitly maintains the color of every vertex after each update, with amortized $O(\log n)$ update time and amortized $O(\log n)$ many recolorings. Further, in the worst case the update time and the number of recolorings is $O(n)$. Further, we present a deterministic incremental $(1+2 \log n)$-coloring algorithm which explicitly maintains the color of every vertex after each update, with $O(α(n))$ amortized update time, at most one recoloring and $O(1)$ query time. We then show a deterministic incremental $2$-coloring algorithm which does not maintain color of every vertex after each update, with amortized $O(α(n))$ update time, amortized $O(α(n))$ recolorings, and amortized $O(α(n))$ query time. For general graphs and graphs of bounded arboricity $γ$ and maximum degree $Δ$ we present a deterministic $(Δ+1)$-coloring algorithm with $O(\sqrt{m})$ update time, $O(1)$ query time, and one recoloring. Finally, we show a deterministic $(Δ+1)$-coloring algorithm with amortized $O(γ+ \log{n})$ update time, $O(1)$ query time, and one recoloring.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Hardness and Parameterized Algorithms on Rainbow Connectivity problem

A path in an edge colored graph is said to be a rainbow path if no two edges on the path have the same color. An edge colored graph is (strongly) rainbow connected if there exists a (geodesic) rainbow path between every pair of vertices. The (strong) rainbow connectivity of a graph G, denoted by (src(G), respectively) rc(G) is the smallest number of colors required to edge color the graph such that G is (strongly) rainbow connected. In this paper we study the rainbow connectivity problem and the strong rainbow connectivity problem from a computational point of view. Our main results can be summarised as below: 1) For every fixed k >= 3, it is NP-Complete to decide whether src(G) <= k even when the graph G is bipartite. 2) For every fixed odd k >= 3, it is NP-Complete to decide whether rc(G) <= k. This resolves one of the open problems posed by Chakraborty et al. (J. Comb. Opt., 2011) where they prove the hardness for the even case. 3) The following problem is fixed parameter tractable: Given a graph G, determine the maximum number of pairs of vertices that can be rainbow connected using two colors. 4) For a directed graph G, it is NP-Complete to decide whether rc(G) <= 2.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

New Hardness Results in Rainbow Connectivity

A path in an edge colored graph is said to be a rainbow path if no two edges on the path have the same color. An edge colored graph is (strongly) rainbow connected if there exists a (geodesic) rainbow path between every pair of vertices. The (strong) rainbow connectivity of a graph $G$, denoted by ($src(G)$, respectively) $rc(G)$ is the smallest number of colors required to edge color the graph such that the graph is (strong) rainbow connected. It is known that for \emph{even} $k$ to decide whether the rainbow connectivity of a graph is at most $k$ or not is NP-hard. It was conjectured that for all $k$, to decide whether $rc(G) \leq k$ is NP-hard. In this paper we prove this conjecture. We also show that it is NP-hard to decide whether $src(G) \leq k$ or not even when $G$ is a bipartite graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Popularity at Minimum Cost

We consider an extension of the {\em popular matching} problem in this paper. The input to the popular matching problem is a bipartite graph G = (A U B,E), where A is a set of people, B is a set of items, and each person a belonging to A ranks a subset of items in an order of preference, with ties allowed. The popular matching problem seeks to compute a matching M* between people and items such that there is no matching M where more people are happier with M than with M*. Such a matching M* is called a popular matching. However, there are simple instances where no popular matching exists. Here we consider the following natural extension to the above problem: associated with each item b belonging to B is a non-negative price cost(b), that is, for any item b, new copies of b can be added to the input graph by paying an amount of cost(b) per copy. When G does not admit a popular matching, the problem is to &#34;augment&#34; G at minimum cost such that the new graph admits a popular matching. We show that this problem is NP-hard; in fact, it is NP-hard to approximate it within a factor of sqrt{n1}/2, where n1 is the number of people. This problem has a simple polynomial time algorithm when each person has a preference list of length at most 2. However, if we consider the problem of &#34;constructing&#34; a graph at minimum cost that admits a popular matching that matches all people, then even with preference lists of length 2, the problem becomes NP-hard. On the other hand, when the number of copies of each item is &#34;fixed&#34;, we show that the problem of computing a minimum cost popular matching or deciding that no popular matching exists can be solved in O(mn1) time, where m is the number of edges.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access