BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Philippe Grangier

Philippe Grangier contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
quant-phphysics.hist-phmath.OCphysics.opticsRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
15works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

15 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

A contextually objective approach to the extended Wigner's friend thought experiment

We present a discussion of the extended Wigner's friend thought experiment proposed by Frauchiger and Renner in [1]. We show by using various arguments, including textbook quantum mechanics and the ontological approach of Contexts, Systems, Modalities (CSM), that no contradiction arises if one admits that agents must agree on what is considered as a system and what is not. In such a contextually objective approach of quantum mechanics, the apparent contradiction is automatically removed. We also discuss why this mutual agreement between agents is already implicit in the standard formulations of quantum mechanics, and why removing it leads to inconsistencies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Contextual inferences, nonlocality, and the incompleteness of quantum mechanics

It is known that "quantum non locality", leading to the violation of Bell's inequality and more generally of classical local realism, can be attributed to the conjunction of two properties, that we call here elementary locality and predictive completeness. Taking this point of view, we show again that quantum mechanics violates predictive completeness, allowing to make contextual inferences, which can in turn explain why quantum non locality does not contradict relativistic causality. But if the usual quantum state $ψ$ is predictively incomplete, how to complete it ? We give here a set of new arguments to show that $ψ$ should be completed indeed, not by looking for any "hidden variables", but rather by specifying the measurement context, which is required to define actual probabilities over a set of mutually exclusive physical events.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Revisiting Quantum Contextuality

The purpose of this note is to complete the interesting review on quantum contextuality [1] that appeared recently. In particular we will introduce and discuss the ideas of extracontextuality and extravalence, that allow one to relate Kochen-Specker's and Gleason's theorems, and also to shift the emphasis from the first to the second one. We will also argue that whereas Kochen-Specker's is essentially a negative result (a no-go theorem), Gleason's is a positive one since it provides a mathematical justification of Born's rule. The link between these issues is provided by a specific quantum feature that we call extravalence.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Revisiting Quantum Mysteries

In this article we argue that in quantum mechanics, and in opposition to classical physics, it is impossible to say that an isolated quantum system "owns" a physical property. Some properties of the system, its mass for example, belong to it in a sense close to that of classical physics; but most often a property must be attributed to the system within a context. We give simple motivations for adopting this point of view, and show that it clarifies many issues in quantum physics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

E-commerce warehousing: learning a storage policy

E-commerce with major online retailers is changing the way people consume. The goal of increasing delivery speed while remaining cost-effective poses significant new challenges for supply chains as they race to satisfy the growing and fast-changing demand. In this paper, we consider a warehouse with a Robotic Mobile Fulfillment System (RMFS), in which a fleet of robots stores and retrieves shelves of items and brings them to human pickers. To adapt to changing demand, uncertainty, and differentiated service (e.g., prime vs. regular), one can dynamically modify the storage allocation of a shelf. The objective is to define a dynamic storage policy to minimise the average cycle time used by the robots to fulfil requests. We propose formulating this system as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process, and using a Deep Q-learning agent from Reinforcement Learning, to learn an efficient real-time storage policy that leverages repeated experiences and insightful forecasts using simulations. Additionally, we develop a rollout strategy to enhance our method by leveraging more information available at a given time step. Using simulations to compare our method to traditional storage rules used in the industry showed preliminary results up to 14\% better in terms of travelling times.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Revisiting Born's rule through Uhlhorn's and Gleason's theorems

In a previous article [1] we presented an argument to obtain (or rather infer) Born's rule, based on a simple set of axioms named "Contexts, Systems and Modalities" (CSM). In this approach there is no "emergence", but the structure of quantum mechanics can be attributed to an interplay between the quantized number of modalities that are accessible to a quantum system, and the continuum of contexts that are required to define these modalities. The strong link of this derivation with Gleason's theorem was emphasized, with the argument that CSM provides a physical justification for Gleason's hypotheses. Here we extend this result by showing that an essential one among these hypotheses - the need of unitary transforms to relate different contexts - can be removed and is better seen as a necessary consequence of Uhlhorn's theorem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Completing the quantum formalism in a contextually objective framework

In standard quantum mechanics (QM), a state vector $| ψ\rangle$ may belong to infinitely many different orthogonal bases, as soon as the dimension $N$ of the Hilbert space is at least three. On the other hand, a complete physical observable $A$ (with no degeneracy left) is associated with a $N$-dimensional orthogonal basis of eigenvectors. In an idealized case, measuring $A$ again and again will give repeatedly the same result, with the same eigenvalue. Let us call this repeatable result a modality $μ$, and the corresponding eigenstate $| ψ\rangle$. A question is then: does $| ψ\rangle$ give a complete description of $μ$ ? The answer is obviously no, since $| ψ\rangle$ does not specify the full observable $A$ that allowed us to obtain $μ$; hence the physical description given by $| ψ\rangle$ is incomplete, as claimed by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen in their famous article in 1935. Here we want to spell out this provocative statement, and in particular to answer the questions: if $| ψ\rangle$ is an incomplete description of $μ$, what does it describe ? is it possible to obtain a complete description, maybe algebraic ? Our conclusion is that the incompleteness of standard QM is due to its attempt to describe systems without contexts, whereas both are always required, even if they can be separated outside the measurement periods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Production and applications of non-Gaussian quantum states of light

This review covers recent theoretical and experimental efforts to extend the application of the continuous-variable quantum technology of light beyond "Gaussian" quantum states, such as coherent and squeezed states, into the domain of "non-Gaussian" states with negative Wigner functions. Starting with basic Gaussian nonclassicality associated with single- and two-mode vacuum states produced by means of parametric down-conversion and applying a set of standard tools, such as linear interferometry, coherent state injection, and conditional homodyne and photon number measurements, one can implement a large variety of optical states and processes that are relevant in fundamental quantum physics as well as quantum optical information processing. We present a systematic review of these methods, paying attention to both fundamental and practical aspects of their implementation, as well as a comprehensive overview of the results achieved therewith.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

A generic model for quantum measurements

In previous articles we presented a derivation of Born's rule and unitary transforms in Quantum Mechanics (QM), from a simple set of axioms built upon a physical phenomenology of quantization. Physically, the structure of QM results of an interplay between the quantized number of "modalities" accessible to a quantum system, and the continuum of "contexts" required to define these modalities. In the present article we provide a unified picture of quantum measurements within our approach, and justify further the role of the system-context dichotomy, and of quantum interferences. We also discuss links with stochastic quantum thermodynamics, and with algebraic quantum theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Deriving Born's rule from an Inference to the Best Explanation

In previous articles we presented a simple set of axioms named Contexts, Systems and Modalities (CSM), where the structure of quantum mechanics appears as a result of the interplay between the quantized number of modalities accessible to a quantum system, and the continuum of contexts that are required to define these modalities. In the present article we discuss further how to obtain (or rather infer) Born's rule within this framework. Our approach is compared with other former and recent derivations, and its strong links with Gleason's theorem are particularly emphasized.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Extracontextuality and Extravalence in Quantum Mechanics

We develop the point of view where Quantum Mechanics results from the interplay between the quantized number of "modalities" accessible to a quantum system, and the continuum of "contexts" that are required to define these modalities. We point out the specific roles of "extracontextuality" and "extravalence" of modalities, and relate them to the Kochen-Specker and Gleason theorems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Recovering the quantum formalism from physically realist axioms

We present a heuristic derivation of Born's rule and unitary transforms in Quantum Mechanics, from a simple set of axioms built upon a physical phenomenology of quantization. This approach naturally leads to the usual quantum formalism, within a new realistic conceptual framework that is discussed in details. Physically, the structure of Quantum Mechanics appears as a result of the interplay between the quantized number of "modalities" accessible to a quantum system, and the continuum of "contexts" that are required to define these modalities. Mathematically, the Hilbert space structure appears as a consequence of a specific "extra-contextuality" of modalities, closely related to the hypothesis of Gleason's theorem, and consistent with its conclusions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Violation of Bell's inequalities in a quantum realistic framework

We discuss the recently observed "loophole free" violation of Bell's inequalities in the framework of a physically realist view of quantum mechanics, which requires that physical properties are attributed jointly to a system, and to the context in which it is embedded. This approach is clearly different from classical realism, but it does define a meaningful "quantum realism" from a general philosophical point of view. Consistently with Bell test experiments, this quantum realism embeds some form of non-locality, but does not contain any action at a distance, in agreement with quantum mechanics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Contexts, Systems and Modalities: a new ontology for quantum mechanics

In this article we present a possible way to make usual quantum mechanics fully compatible with physical realism, defined as the statement that the goal of physics is to study entities of the natural world, existing independently from any particular observer's perception, and obeying universal and intelligible rules. Rather than elaborating on the quantum formalism itself, we propose to modify the quantum ontology, by requiring that physical properties are attributed jointly to the system, and to the context in which it is embedded. In combination with a quantization principle, this non-classical definition of physical reality sheds new light on counter-intuitive features of quantum mechanics such as the origin of probabilities, non-locality, and the quantum-classical boundary.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access