Source author record

Philip Ernst

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.PR q-fin.MF math.ST Methodology q-fin.PR q-fin.ST Statistics Theory

Catalog footprint

Research overview

10works

7topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2022arXiv

Asymptotic behavior of the occupancy density for obliquely reflected Brownian motion in a half-plane and Martin boundary

Let $π$ be the occupancy density of an obliquely reflected Brownian motion in the half plane and let ( $ρ$ , $α$ ) be the polar coordinates of a point in the upper half plane. This work determines the exact asymptotic behavior of $π$ ( $ρ$ , $α$ ) as $ρ$ $\rightarrow$ $\infty$ with $α$ $\in$ (0, $π$ ). We find explicit functions a, b, c such that $π$ ( $ρ$ , $α$ ) $\sim$ $ρ$ $\rightarrow$ $\infty$ a( $α$ ) $ρ$ b( $α$ ) e --c( $α$ ) $ρ$ . This closes an open problem first stated by Professor J. Michael Harrison in August 2013. We also compute the exact asymptotics for the tail distribution of the boundary occupancy measure and we obtain an explicit integral expression for $π$ . We conclude by finding the Martin boundary of the process and giving all of the corresponding harmonic functions satisfying an oblique Neumann boundary problem.

preprint2016arXiv

Bayesian aggregation of two forecasts in the partial information framework

We generalize the results of \cite{SPU, SJPU} by showing how the Gaussian aggregator may be computed in a setting where parameter estimation is not required. We proceed to provide an explicit formula for a "one-shot" aggregation problem with two forecasters.

preprint2016arXiv

Exercising Control When Confronted by a (Brownian) Spider

We consider the Brownian "spider," a construct introduced in \cite{Dubins} and in \cite{Pitman}. In this note, the author proves the "spider" bounds by using the dynamic programming strategy of guessing the optimal reward function and subsequently establishing its optimality by proving its excessiveness.

preprint2016arXiv

On occupation times of the first and third quadrants for planar Brownian motion

An open problem of interest, first infused into the applied probability community in the work of Bingham and Doney in 1988, (see \cite{Bingham}) is stated as follows: find the distribution of the quadrant occupation time of planar Brownian motion. In this short communication, we study an alternate formulation of this longstanding open problem: let $X(t), Y(t), t \geq 0$ be standard Brownian motions starting at $x,y$ respectively. Find the distribution of the total time $T=Leb\{t \in [0,1]: X(t) \times Y(t) >0\}$ , when $x=y=0$ , i.e., the occupation time of the union of the first and third quadrants. If two adjacent quadrants are used, the problem becomes much easier and the distribution of $T$ follows the arcsine law.

preprint2016arXiv

On Optimal Retirement (How to Retire Early)

We pose an optimal control problem arising in a perhaps new model for retirement investing. Given a control function $f$ and our current net worth as $X(t)$ for any $t$ , we invest an amount $f(X(t))$ in the market. We need a fortune of $M$ "superdollars" to retire and want to retire as early as possible. We model our change in net worth over each infinitesimal time interval by the Ito process $dX(t)= (1+f(X(t))dt+ f(X(t))dW(t)$ . We show how to choose the optimal $f=f_0$ and show that the choice of $f_0$ is optimal among all nonanticipative investment strategies, not just among Markovian ones.

preprint2016arXiv

On the Time for Brownian Motion to Visit Every Point on a Circle

Consider a Wiener process $W$ on a circle of circumference $L$ . We prove the rather surprising result that the Laplace transform of the distribution of the first time, $θ_L$ , when the Wiener process has visited every point of the circle can be solved in closed form using a continuous recurrence approach.

preprint2016arXiv

Revisiting a Theorem of L.A. Shepp on Optimal Stopping

Using a bondholder who seeks to determine when to sell his bond as our motivating example, we revisit one of Larry Shepp's classical theorems on optimal stopping. We offer a novel proof of Theorem 1 from from \cite{Shepp}. Our approach is that of guessing the optimal control function and proving its optimality with martingales. Without martingale theory one could hardly prove our guess to be correct.

preprint2016arXiv

The value of foresight

Suppose you have one unit of stock, currently worth 1, which you must sell before time $T$ . The Optional Sampling Theorem tells us that whatever stopping time we choose to sell, the expected discounted value we get when we sell will be 1. Suppose however that we are able to see $a$ units of time into the future, and base our stopping rule on that; we should be able to do better than expected value 1. But how much better can we do? And how would we exploit the additional information? The optimal solution to this problem will never be found, but in this paper we establish remarkably close bounds on the value of the problem, and we derive a fairly simple exercise rule that manages to extract most of the value of foresight.

preprint2016arXiv

Yule's "Nonsense Correlation" Solved!

In this paper, we resolve a longstanding open statistical problem. The problem is to mathematically confirm Yule's 1926 empirical finding of "nonsense correlation" (\cite{Yule}). We do so by analytically determining the second moment of the empirical correlation coefficient \beqn θ:= \frac{\int_0^1W_1(t)W_2(t) dt - \int_0^1W_1(t) dt \int_0^1 W_2(t) dt}{\sqrt{\int_0^1 W^2_1(t) dt - \parens{\int_0^1W_1(t) dt}^2} \sqrt{\int_0^1 W^2_2(t) dt - \parens{\int_0^1W_2(t) dt}^2}}, \eeqn of two {\em independent} Wiener processes, $W_1,W_2$ . Using tools from Fred- holm integral equation theory, we successfully calculate the second moment of $θ$ to obtain a value for the standard deviation of $θ$ of nearly .5. The "nonsense" correlation, which we call "volatile" correlation, is volatile in the sense that its distribution is heavily dispersed and is frequently large in absolute value. It is induced because each Wiener process is "self-correlated" in time. This is because a Wiener process is an integral of pure noise and thus its values at different time points are correlated. In addition to providing an explicit formula for the second moment of $θ$ , we offer implicit formulas for higher moments of $θ$ .

preprint2014arXiv

The General Stationary Gaussian Markov Process

We find the class, ${\cal{C}}_k, k \ge 0$ , of all zero mean stationary Gaussian processes, $Y(t), ~t \in \reals$ with $k$ derivatives, for which \begin{equation} Z(t) \equiv (Y^{(0)}(t), Y^{(1)}(t), \ldots, Y^{(k)}(t) ), ~ t \ge 0 \end{equation} \noindent is a $(k+1)$ -vector Markov process. (here, $Y^{(0)}(t) = Y(t)$ ).

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Philip Ernst

Research overview

Is this your work?

10 publications

Asymptotic behavior of the occupancy density for obliquely reflected Brownian motion in a half-plane and Martin boundary

Bayesian aggregation of two forecasts in the partial information framework

Exercising Control When Confronted by a (Brownian) Spider

On occupation times of the first and third quadrants for planar Brownian motion

On Optimal Retirement (How to Retire Early)

On the Time for Brownian Motion to Visit Every Point on a Circle

Revisiting a Theorem of L.A. Shepp on Optimal Stopping

The value of foresight

Yule's "Nonsense Correlation" Solved!

The General Stationary Gaussian Markov Process

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview