The sup-norm problem for automorphic cusp forms of
Let be an -normalized Hecke--Maaß cusp form for on the locally symmetric space . If is a compact subset of , then we prove the bound for some depending only on , where is the Laplace eigenvalue of .
Source author record
Péter Maga
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Catalog footprint
Research overview
5works
3topics
4close collaborators
Published work
5 publications
preprint2014arXiv
Subconvexity for sup-norms of automorphic forms on PGL(n)
We prove the subconvexity conjecture for sup-norms of automorphic forms for congruence subgroups of SL(n, Z) that satisfy the Ramanujan conjecture at infinity.
Open access
preprint2014arXiv
The sup-norm problem for PGL(4)
Let F be a Hecke-Maass cusp form for the group SL(4, Z) with Laplace eigenvalue lambda. Assume that F satisfies the Ramanujan conjecture at infinity (this is satisfied by almost all cusp forms). We show a power-saving sup-norm bound in terms of lambda (relative to the generic bound) for F restricted to a compact set.
Open access
preprint2012arXiv
A semi-adelic Kuznetsov formula over number fields
In these notes, we prove a semi-adelic version of the Kuznetsov formula over arbitrary number fields. The extent is the set of those automorphic vectors which are not necessarily spherical in the archimedean aspect and a class of weight functions which is important for applications.
Open access
preprint2012arXiv
How large dimension guarantees a given angle?
We study the following two problems: (1) Given n≥2 and $\al$, how large Hausdorff dimension can a compact set $A\su\Rn$ have if A does not contain three points that form an angle $\al$? (2) Given $\al$ and $\de$, how large Hausdorff dimension can a %compact subset A of a Euclidean space have if A does not contain three points that form an angle in the $\de$-neighborhood of $\al$? An interesting phenomenon is that different angles show different behaviour in the above problems. Apart from the clearly special extreme angles 0 and 180∘, the angles 60∘,90∘ and 120∘ also play special role in problem (2): the maximal dimension is smaller for these special angles than for the other angles. In problem (1) the angle 90∘ seems to behave differently from other angles.
Open access
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.