Researcher profile

András Máthé

András Máthé contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Generalized Hausdorff measure for generic compact sets

Let $X$ be a Polish space. We prove that the generic compact set $K\subseteq X$ (in the sense of Baire category) is either finite or there is a continuous gauge function $h$ such that $0<\mathcal{H}^{h}(K)<\infty$, where $\mathcal{H}^h$ denotes the $h$-Hausdorff measure. This answers a question of C. Cabrelli, U. B. Darji, and U. M. Molter. Moreover, for every weak contraction $f\colon K\to X$ we have $\mathcal{H}^{h} (K\cap f(K))=0$. This is a measure theoretic analogue of a result of M. Elekes.

preprint2012arXiv

How large dimension guarantees a given angle?

We study the following two problems: (1) Given $n\ge 2$ and $\al$, how large Hausdorff dimension can a compact set $A\su\Rn$ have if $A$ does not contain three points that form an angle $\al$? (2) Given $\al$ and $\de$, how large Hausdorff dimension can a %compact subset $A$ of a Euclidean space have if $A$ does not contain three points that form an angle in the $\de$-neighborhood of $\al$? An interesting phenomenon is that different angles show different behaviour in the above problems. Apart from the clearly special extreme angles 0 and $180^\circ$, the angles $60^\circ,90^\circ$ and $120^\circ$ also play special role in problem (2): the maximal dimension is smaller for these special angles than for the other angles. In problem (1) the angle $90^\circ$ seems to behave differently from other angles.

preprint2012arXiv

Sets of large dimension not containing polynomial configurations

The main result of this paper is the following. Given countably many multivariate polynomials with rational coefficients and maximum degree $d$, we construct a compact set $E\subset \R^n$ of Hausdorff dimension $n/d$ which does not contain finite point configurations corresponding to the zero sets of the given polynomials. Given a set $E\subset \R^n$, we study the angles determined by three points of $E$. The main result implies the existence of a compact set in $\R^n$ of Hausdorff dimension $n/2$ which does not contain the angle $π/2$. (This is known to be sharp if $n$ is even.) We show that there is a compact set of Hausdorff dimension $n/8$ which does not contain an angle in any given countable set. We also construct a compact set $E\subset \R^n$ of Hausdorff dimension $n/6$ for which the set of angles determined by $E$ is Lebesgue null. In the other direction, we present a result that every set of sufficiently large dimension contains an angle $ε$ close to any given angle.

preprint2011arXiv

Can we assign the Borel hulls in a monotone way?

A \emph{hull} of $A \subset [0,1]$ is a set $H$ containing $A$ such that $λ^*(H)=λ^*(A)$. We investigate all four versions of the following problem. Does there exist a monotone (wrt. inclusion) map that assigns a Borel/$G_δ$ hull to every negligible/measurable subset of $[0,1]$? Three versions turn out to be independent of ZFC (the usual Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms with the Axiom of Choice), while in the fourth case we only prove that the nonexistence of a monotone $G_δ$ hull operation for all measurable sets is consistent. It remains open whether existence here is also consistent. We also answer a question of Z. Gyenes and D. Pálvölgyi which asks if monotone hulls can be defined for every chain (wrt. inclusion) of measurable sets. We also comment on the problem of hulls of all subsets of $[0,1]$.