Source author record

Pengming Wang

Pengming Wang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Learning a Large Neighborhood Search Algorithm for Mixed Integer Programs

Large Neighborhood Search (LNS) is a combinatorial optimization heuristic that starts with an assignment of values for the variables to be optimized, and iteratively improves it by searching a large neighborhood around the current assignment. In this paper we consider a learning-based LNS approach for mixed integer programs (MIPs). We train a Neural Diving model to represent a probability distribution over assignments, which, together with an off-the-shelf MIP solver, generates an initial assignment. Formulating the subsequent search steps as a Markov Decision Process, we train a Neural Neighborhood Selection policy to select a search neighborhood at each step, which is searched using a MIP solver to find the next assignment. The policy network is trained using imitation learning. We propose a target policy for imitation that, given enough compute resources, is guaranteed to select the neighborhood containing the optimal next assignment amongst all possible choices for the neighborhood of a specified size. Our approach matches or outperforms all the baselines on five real-world MIP datasets with large-scale instances from diverse applications, including two production applications at Google. It achieves $2\times$ to $37.8\times$ better average primal gap than the best baseline on three of the datasets at large running times.

preprint2016arXiv

Lasserre Lower Bounds and Definability of Semidefinite Programming

For a large class of optimization problems, namely those that can be expressed as finite-valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSPs), we establish a dichotomy on the number of levels of the Lasserre hierarchy of semi-definite programs (SDPs) that are required to solve the problem exactly. In particular, we show that if a finite-valued constraint problem is not solved exactly by its basic linear programming relaxation, it is also not solved exactly by any sub-linear number of levels of the Lasserre hierarchy. The lower bounds are established through logical undefinability results. We show that the linear programming relaxation of the problem, as well as the SDP corresponding to any fixed level of the Lasserre hierarchy is interpretable in a VCSP instance by means of formulas of fixed-point logic with counting. We also show that the solution of an SDP can be expressed in this logic. Together, these results give a way of translating lower bounds on the number of variables required in counting logic to express a VCSP into lower bounds on the number of levels required in the Lasserre hierarchy to eliminate the integrality gap. As a special case, we obtain the same dichotomy for the class of MAXCSP problems, generalizing some earlier Lasserre lower bound results of Schoenebeck.

preprint2015arXiv

A Definability Dichotomy for Finite Valued CSPs

Finite valued constraint satisfaction problems are a formalism for describing many natural optimization problems, where constraints on the values that variables can take come with rational weights and the aim is to find an assignment of minimal cost. Thapper and Zivny have recently established a complexity dichotomy for finite valued constraint languages. They show that each such language either gives rise to a polynomial-time solvable optimization problem, or to an NP-hard one, and establish a criterion to distinguish the two cases. We refine the dichotomy by showing that all optimization problems in the first class are definable in fixed-point language with counting, while all languages in the second class are not definable, even in infinitary logic with counting. Our definability dichotomy is not conditional on any complexity-theoretic assumption.

preprint2014arXiv

From Approximate Factorization to Root Isolation with Application to Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition

We present an algorithm for isolating the roots of an arbitrary complex polynomial $p$ that also works for polynomials with multiple roots provided that the number $k$ of distinct roots is given as part of the input. It outputs $k$ pairwise disjoint disks each containing one of the distinct roots of $p$, and its multiplicity. The algorithm uses approximate factorization as a subroutine. In addition, we apply the new root isolation algorithm to a recent algorithm for computing the topology of a real planar algebraic curve specified as the zero set of a bivariate integer polynomial and for isolating the real solutions of a bivariate polynomial system. For input polynomials of degree $n$ and bitsize $τ$, we improve the currently best running time from $\tO(n^{9}τ+n^{8}τ^{2})$ (deterministic) to $\tO(n^{6}+n^{5}τ)$ (randomized) for topology computation and from $\tO(n^{8}+n^{7}τ)$ (deterministic) to $\tO(n^{6}+n^{5}τ)$ (randomized) for solving bivariate systems.