BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Anuj Dawar

Anuj Dawar appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Logic in Computer ScienceComputational ComplexityDiscrete MathematicsData Structures and Algorithmsmath.CTmath.LO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

13works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Lovász-Type Theorems and Game Comonads

Lovász (1967) showed that two finite relational structures A and B are isomorphic if, and only if, the number of homomorphisms from C to A is the same as the number of homomorphisms from C to B for any finite structure C. Soon after, Pultr (1973) proved a categorical generalisation of this fact. We propose a new categorical formulation, which applies to any locally finite category with pushouts and a proper factorisation system. As special cases of this general theorem, we obtain two variants of Lovász' theorem: the result by Dvořák (2010) that characterises equivalence of graphs in the k-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman equivalence by homomorphism counts from graphs of tree-width at most k, and the result of Grohe (2020) characterising equivalence with respect to first-order logic with counting and quantifier depth k in terms of homomorphism counts from graphs of tree-depth at most k. The connection of our categorical formulation with these results is obtained by means of the game comonads of Abramsky et al. We also present a novel application to homomorphism counts in modal logic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Relativization of Gurevich's Conjectures

Gurevich (1988) conjectured that there is no logic for $\textsf{P}$ or for $\textsf{NP}\cap \textsf{coNP}$. For the latter complexity class, he also showed that the existence of a logic would imply that $\textsf{NP} \cap \textsf{coNP}$ has a complete problem under polynomial time reductions. We show that there is an oracle with respect to which $\textsf P$ does have a logic and $\textsf P \ne\textsf{NP}$. We also show that a logic for $\textsf{NP} \cap \textsf{coNP}$ follows from the existence of a complete problem and a further assumption about canonical labelling. For intersection classes $Σ^p_n \cap Π^p_n$ higher in the polynomial hierarchy, the existence of a logic is equivalent to the existence of complete problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Symmetric Circuits for Rank Logic

Fixed-point logic with rank (FPR) is an extension of fixed-point logic with counting (FPC) with operators for computing the rank of a matrix over a finite field. The expressive power of FPR properly extends that of FPC and is contained in PTime, but not known to be properly contained. We give a circuit characterization for FPR in terms of families of symmetric circuits with rank gates, along the lines of that for FPC given by [Anderson and Dawar 2017]. This requires the development of a broad framework of circuits in which the individual gates compute functions that are not symmetric (i.e., invariant under all permutations of their inputs). In the case of FPC, the proof of equivalence of circuits and logic rests heavily on the assumption that individual gates compute such symmetric functions and so novel techniques are required to make this work for FPR.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Descriptive complexity of graph spectra

Two graphs are co-spectral if their respective adjacency matrices have the same multi-set of eigenvalues. A graph is said to be determined by its spectrum if all graphs that are co-spectral with it are isomorphic to it. We consider these properties in relation to logical definability. We show that any pair of graphs that are elementarily equivalent with respect to the three-variable counting first-order logic $C^3$ are co-spectral, and this is not the case with $C^2$, nor with any number of variables if we exclude counting quantifiers. We also show that the class of graphs that are determined by their spectra is definable in partial fixed-point logic with counting. We relate these properties to other algebraic and combinatorial problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Lasserre Lower Bounds and Definability of Semidefinite Programming

For a large class of optimization problems, namely those that can be expressed as finite-valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSPs), we establish a dichotomy on the number of levels of the Lasserre hierarchy of semi-definite programs (SDPs) that are required to solve the problem exactly. In particular, we show that if a finite-valued constraint problem is not solved exactly by its basic linear programming relaxation, it is also not solved exactly by any sub-linear number of levels of the Lasserre hierarchy. The lower bounds are established through logical undefinability results. We show that the linear programming relaxation of the problem, as well as the SDP corresponding to any fixed level of the Lasserre hierarchy is interpretable in a VCSP instance by means of formulas of fixed-point logic with counting. We also show that the solution of an SDP can be expressed in this logic. Together, these results give a way of translating lower bounds on the number of variables required in counting logic to express a VCSP into lower bounds on the number of levels required in the Lasserre hierarchy to eliminate the integrality gap. As a special case, we obtain the same dichotomy for the class of MAXCSP problems, generalizing some earlier Lasserre lower bound results of Schoenebeck.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Definability Dichotomy for Finite Valued CSPs

Finite valued constraint satisfaction problems are a formalism for describing many natural optimization problems, where constraints on the values that variables can take come with rational weights and the aim is to find an assignment of minimal cost. Thapper and Zivny have recently established a complexity dichotomy for finite valued constraint languages. They show that each such language either gives rise to a polynomial-time solvable optimization problem, or to an NP-hard one, and establish a criterion to distinguish the two cases. We refine the dichotomy by showing that all optimization problems in the first class are definable in fixed-point language with counting, while all languages in the second class are not definable, even in infinitary logic with counting. Our definability dichotomy is not conditional on any complexity-theoretic assumption.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Fixed-parameter Tractable Distances to Sparse Graph Classes

We show that for various classes C of sparse graphs, and several measures of distance to such classes (such as edit distance and elimination distance), the problem of determining the distance of a given graph G to C is fixed-parameter tractable. The results are based on two general techniques. The first of these, building on recent work of Grohe et al. establishes that any class of graphs that is slicewise nowhere dense and slicewise first-order definable is FPT. The second shows that determining the elimination distance of a graph G to a minor-closed class C is FPT.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Graph Isomorphism Parameterized by Elimination Distance to Bounded Degree

A commonly studied means of parameterizing graph problems is the deletion distance from triviality (Guo et al. 2004), which counts vertices that need to be deleted from a graph to place it in some class for which efficient algorithms are known. In the context of graph isomorphism, we define triviality to mean a graph with maximum degree bounded by a constant, as such graph classes admit polynomial-time isomorphism tests. We generalise deletion distance to a measure we call elimination distance to triviality, based on elimination trees or tree-depth decompositions. We establish that graph canonisation, and thus graph isomorphism, is FPT when parameterized by elimination distance to bounded degree, extending results of Bouland et al. (2012).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On Symmetric Circuits and Fixed-Point Logics

We study properties of relational structures such as graphs that are decided by families of Boolean circuits. Circuits that decide such properties are necessarily invariant to permutations of the elements of the input structures. We focus on families of circuits that are symmetric, i.e., circuits whose invariance is witnessed by automorphisms of the circuit induced by the permutation of the input structure. We show that the expressive power of such families is closely tied to definability in logic. In particular, we show that the queries defined on structures by uniform families of symmetric Boolean circuits with majority gates are exactly those definable in fixed-point logic with counting. This shows that inexpressibility results in the latter logic lead to lower bounds against polynomial-size families of symmetric circuits.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On the dynamic width of the 3-colorability problem

A graph $G$ is 3-colorable if and only if it maps homomorphically to the complete 3-vertex graph $K_3$. The last condition can be checked by a $k$-consistency algorithm where the parameter $k$ has to be chosen large enough, dependent on $G$. Let $W(G)$ denote the minimum $k$ sufficient for this purpose. For a non-3-colorable graph $G$, $W(G)$ is equal to the minimum $k$ such that $G$ can be distinguished from $K_3$ in the $k$-variable existential-positive first-order logic. We define the dynamic width of the 3-colorability problem as the function $W(n)=\max_G W(G)$, where the maximum is taken over all non-3-colorable $G$ with $n$ vertices. The assumption $\mathrm{NP}\ne\mathrm{P}$ implies that $W(n)$ is unbounded. Indeed, a lower bound $W(n)=Ω(\log\log n/\log\log\log n)$ follows unconditionally from the work of Nesetril and Zhu on bounded treewidth duality. The Exponential Time Hypothesis implies a much stronger bound $W(n)=Ω(n/\log n)$ and indeed we unconditionally prove that $W(n)=Ω(n)$. In fact, an even stronger statement is true: A first-order sentence distinguishing any 3-colorable graph on $n$ vertices from any non-3-colorable graph on $n$ vertices must have $Ω(n)$ variables. On the other hand, we observe that $W(G)\le 3\,α(G)+1$ and $W(G)\le n-α(G)+1$ for every non-3-colorable graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, where $α(G)$ denotes the independence number of $G$. This implies that $W(n)\le\frac34\,n+1$, improving on the trivial upper bound $W(n)\le n$. We also show that $W(G)>\frac1{16}\, g(G)$ for every non-3-colorable graph $G$, where $g(G)$ denotes the girth of $G$. Finally, we consider the function $W(n)$ over planar graphs and prove that $W(n)=Θ(\sqrt n)$ in the case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Definability of linear equation systems over groups and rings

Motivated by the quest for a logic for PTIME and recent insights that the descriptive complexity of problems from linear algebra is a crucial aspect of this problem, we study the solvability of linear equation systems over finite groups and rings from the viewpoint of logical (inter-)definability. All problems that we consider are decidable in polynomial time, but not expressible in fixed-point logic with counting. They also provide natural candidates for a separation of polynomial time from rank logics, which extend fixed-point logics by operators for determining the rank of definable matrices and which are sufficient for solvability problems over fields. Based on the structure theory of finite rings, we establish logical reductions among various solvability problems. Our results indicate that all solvability problems for linear equation systems that separate fixed-point logic with counting from PTIME can be reduced to solvability over commutative rings. Moreover, we prove closure properties for classes of queries that reduce to solvability over rings, which provides normal forms for logics extended with solvability operators. We conclude by studying the extent to which fixed-point logic with counting can express problems in linear algebra over finite commutative rings, generalising known results on the logical definability of linear-algebraic problems over finite fields.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Maximum Matching and Linear Programming in Fixed-Point Logic with Counting

We establish the expressibility in fixed-point logic with counting (FPC) of a number of natural polynomial-time problems. In particular, we show that the size of a maximum matching in a graph is definable in FPC. This settles an open problem first posed by Blass, Gurevich and Shelah, who asked whether the existence of perfect matchings in general graphs could be determined in the more powerful formalism of choiceless polynomial time with counting. Our result is established by showing that the ellipsoid method for solving linear programs can be implemented in FPC. This allows us to prove that linear programs can be optimised in FPC if the corresponding separation oracle problem can be defined in FPC. On the way to defining a suitable separation oracle for the maximum matching problem, we provide FPC formulas defining maximum flows and canonical minimum cuts in capacitated graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Pebble games with algebraic rules

We define a general framework of partition games for formulating two-player pebble games over finite structures. We show that one particular such game, which we call the invertible-map game, yields a family of polynomial-time approximations of graph isomorphism that is strictly stronger than the well-known Weisfeiler-Lehman method. The general framework we introduce includes as special cases the pebble games for finite-variable logics with and without counting. It also includes a matrix-equivalence game, introduced here, which characterises equivalence in the finite-variable fragments of matrix-rank logic. We show that the equivalence defined by the invertible-map game is a refinement of the equivalence defined by each of these games for finite-variable logics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access