Source author record

Paul S. Wenger

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

11works
4topics
4close collaborators

Published work

11 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Multiple-View Spectral Clustering for Group-wise Functional Community Detection

Functional connectivity analysis yields powerful insights into our understanding of the human brain. Group-wise functional community detection aims to partition the brain into clusters, or communities, in which functional activity is inter-regionally correlated in a common manner across a group of subjects. In this article, we show how to use multiple-view spectral clustering to perform group-wise functional community detection. In a series of experiments on 291 subjects from the Human Connectome Project, we compare three versions of multiple-view spectral clustering: MVSC (uniform weights), MVSCW (weights based on subject-specific embedding quality), and AASC (weights optimized along with the embedding) with the competing technique of Joint Diagonalization of Laplacians (JDL). Results show that multiple-view spectral clustering not only yields group-wise functional communities that are more consistent than JDL when using randomly selected subsets of individual brains, but it is several orders of magnitude faster than JDL.

preprint2016arXiv

Unit Hypercube Visibility Numbers of Trees

A visibility representation of a graph GG is an assignment of the vertices of GG to geometric objects such that vertices are adjacent if and only if their corresponding objects are "visible" each other, that is, there is an uninterrupted channel, usually axis-aligned, between them. Depending on the objects and definition of visibility used, not all graphs are visibility graphs. In such situations, one may be able to obtain a visibility representation of a graph GG by allowing vertices to be assigned to more than one object. The {\it visibility number} of a graph GG is the minimum tt such that GG has a representation in which each vertex is assigned to at most tt objects. In this paper, we explore visibility numbers of trees when the vertices are assigned to unit hypercubes in Rn\mathbb{R}^n. We use two different models of visibility: when lines of sight can be parallel to any standard basis vector of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and when lines of sight are only parallel to the nnth standard basis vector in Rn\mathbb{R}^n. We establish relationships between these visibility models and their connection to trees with certain cubicity values.

preprint2015arXiv

On the Sum Neccesary to Ensure that a Degree Sequence is Potentially H-Graphic

A sequence of nonnegative integers π=(d_1,d_2,...,d_n) is graphic if there is a (simple) graph G with degree sequence π. In this case, G is said to realize or be a realization of π. Degree sequence results in the literature generally fall into two classes: forcible problems, in which all realizations of a graphic sequence must have a given property, and potential problems, in which at least one realization of πmust have the given property. Given a graph H, a graphic sequence πis potentially H-graphic if there is some realization of πthat contains H as a subgraph. In 1991, Erdős, Jacobson and Lehel posed the following question: Determine the minimum integer σ(H,n) such that every n-term graphic sequence with sum at least σ(H,n) is potentially H-graphic. As the sum of the terms of πis twice the number of edges in any realization of π, the Erdős-Jacobson-Lehel problem can be viewed as a potential degree sequence relaxation of the (forcible) Turán problem, wherein one wishes to determine the maximum number of edges in a graph that contains no copy of H. While the exact value of σ(H,n) has been determined for a number of specific classes of graphs (including cliques, cycles, complete bigraphs and others), very little is known about the parameter for arbitrary H. In this paper, we determine σ(H,n) asymptotically for all H, thereby providing an Erdős-Stone-Simonovits-type theorem for the Erdős-Jacobson-Lehel problem.

preprint2015arXiv

The List Distinguishing Number Equals the Distinguishing Number for Interval Graphs

A \textit{distinguishing coloring} of a graph GG is a coloring of the vertices so that every nontrivial automorphism of GG maps some vertex to a vertex with a different color. The \textit{distinguishing number} of GG is the minimum kk such that GG has a distinguishing coloring where each vertex is assigned a color from {1,…,k}\{1,\ldots,k\}. A \textit{list assignment} to GG is an assignment L={L(v)}v∈V(G)L=\{L(v)\}_{v\in V(G)} of lists of colors to the vertices of GG. A \textit{distinguishing LL-coloring} of GG is a distinguishing coloring of GG where the color of each vertex vv comes from L(v)L(v). The {\it list distinguishing number} of GG is the minimum kk such that every list assignment to GG in which ∣L(v)∣=k|L(v)|=k for all v∈V(G)v\in V(G) yields a distinguishing LL-coloring of GG. We prove that if GG is an interval graph, then its distinguishing number and list distinguishing number are equal.

preprint2015arXiv

The Unit Bar Visibility Number of a Graph

A \textit{tt-unit-bar representation} of a graph GG is an assignment of sets of at most tt horizontal unit-length segments in the plane to the vertices of GG so that (1) all of the segments are pairwise nonintersecting, and (2) two vertices xx and yy are adjacent if and only if there is a vertical channel of positive width connecting a segment assigned to xx and a segment assigned to yy that intersects no other segment. The \textit{unit bar visibility number} of a graph GG, denoted ub(G)ub(G), is the minimum tt such that GG has a tt-unit-bar visibility representation. Our results include a linear time algorithm that determines ub(T)ub(T) when TT is a tree, bounds on ub(Km,n)ub(K_{m,n}) that determine ub(Km,n)ub(K_{m,n}) asymptotically when nn and mm are asymptotically equal, and bounds on ub(Kn)ub(K_n) that determine ub(Kn)ub(K_n) exactly when n≡1,2(mod6)n\equiv 1,2\pmod 6.

preprint2015arXiv

Uniquely cycle-saturated graphs

Given a graph FF, a graph GG is {\it uniquely FF-saturated} if FF is not a subgraph of GG and adding any edge of the complement to GG completes exactly one copy of FF. In this paper we study uniquely CtC_t-saturated graphs. We prove the following: (1) a graph is uniquely C5C_5-saturated if and only if it is a friendship graph. (2) There are no uniquely C6C_6-saturated graphs or uniquely C7C_7-saturated graphs. (3) For t≥6t\ge6, there are only finitely many uniquely CtC_t-saturated graphs (we conjecture that in fact there are none).

preprint2014arXiv

Extending Precolorings to Distinguish Group Actions

Given a group ΓΓ acting on a set XX, a kk-coloring ϕ:X→{1,…,k}ϕ:X\to\{1,\dots,k\} of XX is distinguishing with respect to ΓΓ if the only γ∈Γγ\in Γ that fixes ϕϕ is the identity action. The distinguishing number of the action ΓΓ, denoted DΓ(X)D_Γ(X), is then the smallest positive integer kk such that there is a distinguishing kk-coloring of XX with respect to ΓΓ. This notion has been studied in a number of settings, but by far the largest body of work has been concerned with finding the distinguishing number of the action of the automorphism group of a graph GG upon its vertex set, which is referred to as the distinguishing number of GG. The distinguishing number of a group action is a measure of how difficult it is to "break" all of the permutations arising from that action. In this paper, we aim to further differentiate the resilience of group actions with the same distinguishing number. In particular, we introduce a precoloring extension framework to address this issue. A set S⊆XS \subseteq X is a fixing set for ΓΓ if for every non-identity element γ∈Γγ\in Γ there is an element s∈Ss \in S such that γ(s)≠sγ(s) \neq s. The distinguishing extension number ext⁡D(X,Γ;k)\operatorname{ext}_D(X,Γ;k) is the minimum number mm such that for all fixing sets W⊆XW \subseteq X with ∣W∣≥m|W| \geq m, every kk-coloring c:X∖W→[k]c : X \setminus W \to [k] can be extended to a kk-coloring that distinguishes XX. In this paper, we prove that ext⁡D(R,Aut⁡(R),2)=4\operatorname{ext}_D(\mathbb{R},\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{R}),2) =4, where Aut⁡(R)\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{R}) is comprised of compositions of translations and reflections. We also consider the distinguishing extension number of the circle and (finite) cycles, obtaining several exact results and bounds.

preprint2014arXiv

Graph Saturation in Multipartite Graphs

Let GG be a fixed graph and let F{\mathcal F} be a family of graphs. A subgraph JJ of GG is F{\mathcal F}-saturated if no member of F{\mathcal F} is a subgraph of JJ, but for any edge ee in E(G)−E(J)E(G)-E(J), some element of F{\mathcal F} is a subgraph of J+eJ+e. We let ex(F,G)\text{ex}({\mathcal F},G) and sat(F,G)\text{sat}({\mathcal F},G) denote the maximum and minimum size of an F{\mathcal F}-saturated subgraph of GG, respectively. If no element of F{\mathcal F} is a subgraph of GG, then sat(F,G)=ex(F,G)=∣E(G)∣\text{sat}({\mathcal F},G) = \text{ex}({\mathcal F}, G) = |E(G)|. In this paper, for k≥3k\ge 3 and n≥100n\ge 100 we determine sat(K3,Kkn)\text{sat}(K_3,K_k^n), where KknK_k^n is the complete balanced kk-partite graph with partite sets of size nn. We also give several families of constructions of KtK_t-saturated subgraphs of KknK_k^n for t≥4t\ge 4. Our results and constructions provide an informative contrast to recent results on the edge-density version of ex(Kt,Kkn)\text{ex}(K_t,K_k^n) from [A. Bondy, J. Shen, S. Thomassé, and C. Thomassen, Density conditions for triangles in multipartite graphs, Combinatorica 26 (2006), 121--131] and [F. Pfender, Complete subgraphs in multipartite graphs, Combinatorica 32 (2012), no. 4, 483--495].

preprint2011arXiv

List Distinguishing Parameters of Trees

A coloring of the vertices of a graph G is said to be distinguishing} provided no nontrivial automorphism of G preserves all of the vertex colors. The distinguishing number of G, D(G), is the minimum number of colors in a distinguishing coloring of G. The distinguishing chromatic number of G, chi_D(G), is the minimum number of colors in a distinguishing coloring of G that is also a proper coloring. Recently the notion of a distinguishing coloring was extended to that of a list distinguishing coloring. Given an assignment L= {L(v) : v in V(G)} of lists of available colors to the vertices of G, we say that G is (properly) L-distinguishable if there is a (proper) distinguishing coloring f of G such that f(v) is in L(v) for all v. The list distinguishing number of G, D_l(G), is the minimum integer k such that G is L-distinguishable for any list assignment L with |L(v)| = k for all v. Similarly, the list distinguishing chromatic number of G, denoted chi_{D_l}(G) is the minimum integer k such that G is properly L-distinguishable for any list assignment L with |L(v)| = k for all v. In this paper, we study these distinguishing parameters for trees, and in particular extend an enumerative technique of Cheng to show that for any tree T, D_l(T) = D(T), chi_D(T)=chi_{D_l}(T), and chi_D(T) <= D(T) + 1.

preprint2011arXiv

Rainbow Matchings of size δ(G) in Properly Edge-colored Graphs

A {\it rainbow matching} in an edge-colored graph is a matching in which all the edges have distinct colors. Wang asked if there is a function f(δ) such that a properly edge-colored graph G with minimum degree δand order at least f(δ) must have a rainbow matching of size δ. We answer this question in the affirmative; f(δ) = 6.5δsuffices. Furthermore, the proof provides a O(δ(G)|V(G)|^2)-time algorithm that generates such a matching.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.