Paper detail

Unit Hypercube Visibility Numbers of Trees

A visibility representation of a graph $G$ is an assignment of the vertices of $G$ to geometric objects such that vertices are adjacent if and only if their corresponding objects are "visible" each other, that is, there is an uninterrupted channel, usually axis-aligned, between them. Depending on the objects and definition of visibility used, not all graphs are visibility graphs. In such situations, one may be able to obtain a visibility representation of a graph $G$ by allowing vertices to be assigned to more than one object. The {\it visibility number} of a graph $G$ is the minimum $t$ such that $G$ has a representation in which each vertex is assigned to at most $t$ objects. In this paper, we explore visibility numbers of trees when the vertices are assigned to unit hypercubes in $\mathbb{R}^n$. We use two different models of visibility: when lines of sight can be parallel to any standard basis vector of $\mathbb{R}^n$, and when lines of sight are only parallel to the $n$th standard basis vector in $\mathbb{R}^n$. We establish relationships between these visibility models and their connection to trees with certain cubicity values.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.