BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Patrick R. Johnstone

Patrick R. Johnstone contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine Learningmath.OCmath.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
4topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Projective Splitting with Forward Steps: Asynchronous and Block-Iterative Operator Splitting

This work is concerned with the classical problem of finding a zero of a sum of maximal monotone operators. For the projective splitting framework recently proposed by Combettes and Eckstein, we show how to replace the fundamental subproblem calculation using a backward step with one based on two forward steps. The resulting algorithms have the same kind of coordination procedure and can be implemented in the same block-iterative and highly flexible manner, but may perform backward steps on some operators and forward steps on others. Prior algorithms in the projective splitting family have used only backward steps. Forward steps can be used for any Lipschitz-continuous operators provided the stepsize is bounded by the inverse of the Lipschitz constant. If the Lipschitz constant is unknown, a simple backtracking linesearch procedure may be used. For affine operators, the stepsize can be chosen adaptively without knowledge of the Lipschitz constant and without any additional forward steps. We close the paper by empirically studying the performance of several kinds of splitting algorithms on a large-scale rare feature selection problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Single-Forward-Step Projective Splitting: Exploiting Cocoercivity

This work describes a new variant of projective splitting for solving maximal monotone inclusions and complicated convex optimization problems. In the new version, cocoercive operators can be processed with a single forward step per iteration. In the convex optimization context, cocoercivity is equivalent to Lipschitz differentiability. Prior forward-step versions of projective splitting did not fully exploit cocoercivity and required two forward steps per iteration for such operators. Our new single-forward-step method establishes a symmetry between projective splitting algorithms, the classical forward-backward splitting method (FB), and Tseng's forward-backward-forward method (FBF). The new procedure allows for larger stepsizes for cocoercive operators: the stepsize bound is $2β$ for a $β$-cocoercive operator, the same bound as has been established for FB. We show that FB corresponds to an unattainable boundary case of the parameters in the new procedure. Unlike FB, the new method allows for a backtracking procedure when the cocoercivity constant is unknown. Proving convergence of the algorithm requires some departures from the prior proof framework for projective splitting. We close with some computational tests establishing competitive performance for the method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Convergence Rates for Projective Splitting

Projective splitting is a family of methods for solving inclusions involving sums of maximal monotone operators. First introduced by Eckstein and Svaiter in 2008, these methods have enjoyed significant innovation in recent years, becoming one of the most flexible operator splitting frameworks available. While weak convergence of the iterates to a solution has been established, there have been few attempts to study convergence rates of projective splitting. The purpose of this paper is to do so under various assumptions. To this end, there are three main contributions. First, in the context of convex optimization, we establish an $O(1/k)$ ergodic function convergence rate. Second, for strongly monotone inclusions, strong convergence is established as well as an ergodic $O(1/\sqrt{k})$ convergence rate for the distance of the iterates to the solution. Finally, for inclusions featuring strong monotonicity and cocoercivity, linear convergence is established.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Faster Subgradient Methods for Functions with Hölderian Growth

The purpose of this manuscript is to derive new convergence results for several subgradient methods applied to minimizing nonsmooth convex functions with Hölderian growth. The growth condition is satisfied in many applications and includes functions with quadratic growth and weakly sharp minima as special cases. To this end there are three main contributions. First, for a constant and sufficiently small stepsize, we show that the subgradient method achieves linear convergence up to a certain region including the optimal set, with error of the order of the stepsize. Second, if appropriate problem parameters are known, we derive a decaying stepsize which obtains a much faster convergence rate than is suggested by the classical $O(1/\sqrt{k})$ result for the subgradient method. Thirdly we develop a novel "descending stairs" stepsize which obtains this faster convergence rate and also obtains linear convergence for the special case of weakly sharp functions. We also develop an adaptive variant of the "descending stairs" stepsize which achieves the same convergence rate without requiring an error bound constant which is difficult to estimate in practice.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Projective Splitting with Forward Steps only Requires Continuity

A recent innovation in projective splitting algorithms for monotone operator inclusions has been the development of a procedure using two forward steps instead of the customary proximal steps for operators that are Lipschitz continuous. This paper shows that the Lipschitz assumption is unnecessary when the forward steps are performed in finite-dimensional spaces: a backtracking linesearch yields a convergent algorithm for operators that are merely continuous with full domain.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Local and Global Convergence of a General Inertial Proximal Splitting Scheme

This paper is concerned with convex composite minimization problems in a Hilbert space. In these problems, the objective is the sum of two closed, proper, and convex functions where one is smooth and the other admits a computationally inexpensive proximal operator. We analyze a general family of inertial proximal splitting algorithms (GIPSA) for solving such problems. We establish finiteness of the sum of squared increments of the iterates and optimality of the accumulation points. Weak convergence of the entire sequence then follows if the minimum is attained. Our analysis unifies and extends several previous results. We then focus on $\ell_1$-regularized optimization, which is the ubiquitous special case where the nonsmooth term is the $\ell_1$-norm. For certain parameter choices, GIPSA is amenable to a local analysis for this problem. For these choices we show that GIPSA achieves finite "active manifold identification", i.e. convergence in a finite number of iterations to the optimal support and sign, after which GIPSA reduces to minimizing a local smooth function. Local linear convergence then holds under certain conditions. We determine the rate in terms of the inertia, stepsize, and local curvature. Our local analysis is applicable to certain recent variants of the Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm (FISTA), for which we establish active manifold identification and local linear convergence. Our analysis motivates the use of a momentum restart scheme in these FISTA variants to obtain the optimal local linear convergence rate.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access