Source author record

Jonathan Eckstein

Jonathan Eckstein appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.OC Machine Learning Numerical Analysis

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works

3topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Projective Splitting with Forward Steps: Asynchronous and Block-Iterative Operator Splitting

This work is concerned with the classical problem of finding a zero of a sum of maximal monotone operators. For the projective splitting framework recently proposed by Combettes and Eckstein, we show how to replace the fundamental subproblem calculation using a backward step with one based on two forward steps. The resulting algorithms have the same kind of coordination procedure and can be implemented in the same block-iterative and highly flexible manner, but may perform backward steps on some operators and forward steps on others. Prior algorithms in the projective splitting family have used only backward steps. Forward steps can be used for any Lipschitz-continuous operators provided the stepsize is bounded by the inverse of the Lipschitz constant. If the Lipschitz constant is unknown, a simple backtracking linesearch procedure may be used. For affine operators, the stepsize can be chosen adaptively without knowledge of the Lipschitz constant and without any additional forward steps. We close the paper by empirically studying the performance of several kinds of splitting algorithms on a large-scale rare feature selection problem.

preprint2020arXiv

Single-Forward-Step Projective Splitting: Exploiting Cocoercivity

This work describes a new variant of projective splitting for solving maximal monotone inclusions and complicated convex optimization problems. In the new version, cocoercive operators can be processed with a single forward step per iteration. In the convex optimization context, cocoercivity is equivalent to Lipschitz differentiability. Prior forward-step versions of projective splitting did not fully exploit cocoercivity and required two forward steps per iteration for such operators. Our new single-forward-step method establishes a symmetry between projective splitting algorithms, the classical forward-backward splitting method (FB), and Tseng's forward-backward-forward method (FBF). The new procedure allows for larger stepsizes for cocoercive operators: the stepsize bound is $2β$ for a $β$-cocoercive operator, the same bound as has been established for FB. We show that FB corresponds to an unattainable boundary case of the parameters in the new procedure. Unlike FB, the new method allows for a backtracking procedure when the cocoercivity constant is unknown. Proving convergence of the algorithm requires some departures from the prior proof framework for projective splitting. We close with some computational tests establishing competitive performance for the method.

preprint2018arXiv

Convergence Rates for Projective Splitting

Projective splitting is a family of methods for solving inclusions involving sums of maximal monotone operators. First introduced by Eckstein and Svaiter in 2008, these methods have enjoyed significant innovation in recent years, becoming one of the most flexible operator splitting frameworks available. While weak convergence of the iterates to a solution has been established, there have been few attempts to study convergence rates of projective splitting. The purpose of this paper is to do so under various assumptions. To this end, there are three main contributions. First, in the context of convex optimization, we establish an $O(1/k)$ ergodic function convergence rate. Second, for strongly monotone inclusions, strong convergence is established as well as an ergodic $O(1/\sqrt{k})$ convergence rate for the distance of the iterates to the solution. Finally, for inclusions featuring strong monotonicity and cocoercivity, linear convergence is established.

preprint2018arXiv

Projective Splitting with Forward Steps only Requires Continuity

A recent innovation in projective splitting algorithms for monotone operator inclusions has been the development of a procedure using two forward steps instead of the customary proximal steps for operators that are Lipschitz continuous. This paper shows that the Lipschitz assumption is unnecessary when the forward steps are performed in finite-dimensional spaces: a backtracking linesearch yields a convergent algorithm for operators that are merely continuous with full domain.

preprint2015arXiv

Asynchronous Block-Iterative Primal-Dual Decomposition Methods for Monotone Inclusions

We propose new primal-dual decomposition algorithms for solving systems of inclusions involving sums of linearly composed maximally monotone operators. The principal innovation in these algorithms is that they are block-iterative in the sense that, at each iteration, only a subset of the monotone operators needs to be processed, as opposed to all operators as in established methods. Deterministic strategies are used to select the blocks of operators activated at each iteration. In addition, we allow for operator processing "lags", permitting asynchronous implementation. The decomposition phase of each iteration of our methods is to generate points in the graphs of the selected monotone operators, in order to construct a half-space containing the Kuhn-Tucker set associated with the system. The coordination phase of each iteration involves a projection onto this half-space. We present two related methods: the first method provides weakly convergent primal and dual sequences under general conditions, while the second is a variant in which strong convergence is guaranteed without additional assumptions. Neither algorithm requires prior knowledge of bounds on the linear operators involved or the inversion of linear operators. Our algorithmic framework unifies and significantly extends the approaches taken in earlier work on primal-dual projective splitting methods.