BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Panos M. Pardalos

Panos M. Pardalos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Mathematical SoftwareComputer VisionInformation TheoryMachine Learningmath.ITphysics.soc-phSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Survey of Methods for Solving Systems of Nonlinear Equations, Part I: Root-finding Approaches

This paper presents a comprehensive survey of methods which can be utilized to search for solutions to systems of nonlinear equations (SNEs). Our objectives with this survey are to synthesize pertinent literature in this field by presenting a thorough description and analysis of the known methods capable of finding one or many solutions to SNEs, and to assist interested readers seeking to identify solution techniques which are well suited for solving the various classes of SNEs which one may encounter in real world applications. To accomplish these objectives, we present a multi-part survey. In part one, we focus on root-finding approaches which can be used to search for solutions to a SNE without transforming it into an optimization problem. In part two, we will introduce the various transformations which have been utilized to transform a SNE into an optimization problem, and we discuss optimization algorithms which can then be used to search for solutions. In part three, we will present a robust quantitative comparative analysis of methods capable of searching for solutions to SNEs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Survey of Methods for Solving Systems of Nonlinear Equations, Part II: Optimization Based Approaches

This paper presents a comprehensive survey of methods which can be utilized to search for solutions to systems of nonlinear equations (SNEs). Our objectives with this survey are to synthesize pertinent literature in this field by presenting a thorough description and analysis of the known methods capable of finding one or many solutions to SNEs, and to assist interested readers seeking to identify solution techniques which are well suited for solving the various classes of SNEs which one may encounter in real world applications. To accomplish these objectives, we present a multi-part survey. In part one, we focused on root-finding approaches which can be used to search for solutions to a SNE without transforming it into an optimization problem. In part two, we introduce the various transformations which have been utilized to transform a SNE into an optimization problem, and we discuss optimization algorithms which can then be used to search for solutions. We emphasize the important characteristics of each method, and we discuss promising directions for future research. In part three, we will present a robust quantitative comparative analysis of methods capable of searching for solutions to SNEs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Statistical Density-Based Analysis of Graph Clustering Algorithm Performance

Measuring graph clustering quality remains an open problem. To address it, we introduce quality measures based on comparisons of intra- and inter-cluster densities, an accompanying statistical test of the significance of their differences and a step-by-step routine for clustering quality assessment. Our null hypothesis does not rely on any generative model for the graph, unlike modularity which uses the configuration model as a null model. Our measures are shown to meet the axioms of a good clustering quality function, unlike the very commonly used modularity measure. They also have an intuitive graph-theoretic interpretation, a formal statistical interpretation and can be easily tested for significance. Our work is centered on the idea that well clustered graphs will display a significantly larger intra-cluster density than inter-cluster density. We develop tests to validate the existence of such a cluster structure. We empirically explore the behavior of our measures under a number of stress test scenarios and compare their behavior to the commonly used modularity and conductance measures. Empirical stress test results confirm that our measures compare very favorably to the established ones. In particular, they are shown to be more responsive to graph structure and less sensitive to sample size and breakdowns during numerical implementation and less sensitive to uncertainty in connectivity. These features are especially important in the context of larger data sets or when the data may contain errors in the connectivity patterns.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Interpreting Rate-Distortion of Variational Autoencoder and Using Model Uncertainty for Anomaly Detection

Building a scalable machine learning system for unsupervised anomaly detection via representation learning is highly desirable. One of the prevalent methods is using a reconstruction error from variational autoencoder (VAE) via maximizing the evidence lower bound. We revisit VAE from the perspective of information theory to provide some theoretical foundations on using the reconstruction error, and finally arrive at a simpler and more effective model for anomaly detection. In addition, to enhance the effectiveness of detecting anomalies, we incorporate a practical model uncertainty measure into the metric. We show empirically the competitive performance of our approach on benchmark datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Machine Learning Methods for Data Association in Multi-Object Tracking

Data association is a key step within the multi-object tracking pipeline that is notoriously challenging due to its combinatorial nature. A popular and general way to formulate data association is as the NP-hard multidimensional assignment problem (MDAP). Over the last few years, data-driven approaches to assignment have become increasingly prevalent as these techniques have started to mature. We focus this survey solely on learning algorithms for the assignment step of multi-object tracking, and we attempt to unify various methods by highlighting their connections to linear assignment as well as to the MDAP. First, we review probabilistic and end-to-end optimization approaches to data association, followed by methods that learn association affinities from data. We then compare the performance of the methods presented in this survey, and conclude by discussing future research directions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access