BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Or Zamir

Or Zamir appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityComputational GeometryRobotics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Faster algorithm for Unique $(k,2)$-CSP

In a $(k,2)$-Constraint Satisfaction Problem we are given a set of arbitrary constraints on pairs of $k$-ary variables, and are asked to find an assignment of values to these variables such that all constraints are satisfied. The $(k,2)$-CSP problem generalizes problems like $k$-coloring and $k$-list-coloring. In the Unique $(k,2)$-CSP problem, we add the assumption that the input set of constraints has at most one satisfying assignment. Beigel and Eppstein gave an algorithm for $(k,2)$-CSP running in time $O\left(\left(0.4518k\right)^n\right)$ for $k>3$ and $O\left(1.356^n\right)$ for $k=3$, where $n$ is the number of variables. Feder and Motwani improved upon the Beigel-Eppstein algorithm for $k\geq 11$. Hertli, Hurbain, Millius, Moser, Scheder and Szedl{á}k improved these bounds for Unique $(k,2)$-CSP for every $k\geq 5$. We improve the result of Hertli et al. and obtain better bounds for Unique~$(k,2)$-CSP for~$k\geq 5$. In particular, we improve the running time of Unique~$(5,2)$-CSP from~$O\left(2.254^n\right)$ to~$O\left(2.232^n\right)$ and Unique~$(6,2)$-CSP from~$O\left(2.652^n\right)$ to~$O\left(2.641^n\right)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Breaking the $2^n$ barrier for 5-coloring and 6-coloring

The coloring problem (i.e., computing the chromatic number of a graph) can be solved in $O^*(2^n)$ time, as shown by Björklund, Husfeldt and Koivisto in 2009. For $k=3,4$, better algorithms are known for the $k$-coloring problem. $3$-coloring can be solved in $O(1.33^n)$ time (Beigel and Eppstein, 2005) and $4$-coloring can be solved in $O(1.73^n)$ time (Fomin, Gaspers and Saurabh, 2007). Surprisingly, for $k>4$ no improvements over the general $O^*(2^n)$ are known. We show that both $5$-coloring and $6$-coloring can also be solved in $O\left(\left(2-\varepsilon\right)^n\right)$ time for some $\varepsilon>0$. As a crucial step, we obtain an exponential improvement for computing the chromatic number of a very large family of graphs. In particular, for any constants $Δ,α>0$, the chromatic number of graphs with at least $α\cdot n$ vertices of degree at most $Δ$ can be computed in $O\left(\left(2-\varepsilon\right)^n\right)$ time, for some $\varepsilon = \varepsilon_{Δ,α} > 0$. This statement generalizes previous results for bounded-degree graphs (Björklund, Husfeldt, Kaski, and Koivisto, 2010) and graphs with bounded average degree (Golovnev, Kulikov and Mihajilin, 2016). We generalize the aforementioned statement to List Coloring, for which no previous improvements are known even for the case bounded-degree graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Motion Planning for Unlabeled Discs with Optimality Guarantees

We study the problem of path planning for unlabeled (indistinguishable) unit-disc robots in a planar environment cluttered with polygonal obstacles. We introduce an algorithm which minimizes the total path length, i.e., the sum of lengths of the individual paths. Our algorithm is guaranteed to find a solution if one exists, or report that none exists otherwise. It runs in time $\tilde{O}(m^4+m^2n^2)$, where $m$ is the number of robots and $n$ is the total complexity of the workspace. Moreover, the total length of the returned solution is at most $\text{OPT}+4m$, where OPT is the optimal solution cost. To the best of our knowledge this is the first algorithm for the problem that has such guarantees. The algorithm has been implemented in an exact manner and we present experimental results that attest to its efficiency.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Subtree Isomorphism Revisited

The Subtree Isomorphism problem asks whether a given tree is contained in another given tree. The problem is of fundamental importance and has been studied since the 1960s. For some variants, e.g., ordered trees, near-linear time algorithms are known, but for the general case truly subquadratic algorithms remain elusive. Our first result is a reduction from the Orthogonal Vectors problem to Subtree Isomorphism, showing that a truly subquadratic algorithm for the latter refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). In light of this conditional lower bound, we focus on natural special cases for which no truly subquadratic algorithms are known. We classify these cases against the quadratic barrier, showing in particular that: -- Even for binary, rooted trees, a truly subquadratic algorithm refutes SETH. -- Even for rooted trees of depth $O(\log\log{n})$, where $n$ is the total number of vertices, a truly subquadratic algorithm refutes SETH. -- For every constant $d$, there is a constant $ε_d>0$ and a randomized, truly subquadratic algorithm for degree-$d$ rooted trees of depth at most $(1+ ε_d) \log_{d}{n}$. In particular, there is an $O(\min\{ 2.85^h ,n^2 \})$ algorithm for binary trees of depth $h$. Our reductions utilize new "tree gadgets" that are likely useful for future SETH-based lower bounds for problems on trees. Our upper bounds apply a folklore result from randomized decision tree complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access