Existence of Optimal Mechanisms for Selling Multiple Goods: An Elementary Proof
We provide an elementary proof that revenue-maximizing mechanisms exist in multi-parameter settings whenever the distribution of valuations has finite expectation.
Researcher profile
Noam Nisan
Noam Nisan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Trust snapshot
Quick read
Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
11topics
4close collaborators
Actions
Decide how to stay connected
Identity and collaboration
How to connect with this researcher
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Open a focused conversation when the fit is right
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
Building this graph slice
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
9 published item(s)
preprint2026arXiv
The Root of Revenue Continuity
In the setup of selling one or more goods, various papers have shown, in various forms and for various purposes, that a small change in the distribution of a buyer's valuations may cause only a small change in the possible revenue that can be extracted. We prove a simple, clean, convenient, and general statement to this effect: let $X$ and $Y$ be random valuations on $k$ additive goods, and let $W(X,Y)$ be the Wasserstein (or "earth mover's") distance between them; then $$\left\vert \sqrt{Rev(X)}-\sqrt{Rev(Y)}\right\vert \le \sqrt{W(X,Y)}.$$ This further implies that a simple explicit modification of any optimal mechanism for $X$, namely, "uniform discounting," is guaranteed to be almost optimal for any $Y$ that is close to $X$ in the Wasserstein distance.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv
How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning Agents
The usage of automated learning agents is becoming increasingly prevalent in many online economic applications such as online auctions and automated trading. Motivated by such applications, this paper is dedicated to fundamental modeling and analysis of the strategic situations that the users of automated learning agents are facing. We consider strategic settings where several users engage in a repeated online interaction, assisted by regret-minimizing learning agents that repeatedly play a "game" on their behalf. We propose to view the outcomes of the agents' dynamics as inducing a "meta-game" between the users. Our main focus is on whether users can benefit in this meta-game from "manipulating" their own agents by misreporting their parameters to them. We define a general framework to model and analyze these strategic interactions between users of learning agents for general games and analyze the equilibria induced between the users in three classes of games. We show that, generally, users have incentives to misreport their parameters to their own agents, and that such strategic user behavior can lead to very different outcomes than those anticipated by standard analysis.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv
Auctions Between Regret-Minimizing Agents
We analyze a scenario in which software agents implemented as regret-minimizing algorithms engage in a repeated auction on behalf of their users. We study first-price and second-price auctions, as well as their generalized versions (e.g., as those used for ad auctions). Using both theoretical analysis and simulations, we show that, surprisingly, in second-price auctions the players have incentives to misreport their true valuations to their own learning agents, while in the first-price auction it is a dominant strategy for all players to truthfully report their valuations to their agents.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv
Complexity of Public Goods Games on Graphs
We study the computational complexity of "public goods games on networks". In this model, each vertex in a graph is an agent that needs to take a binary decision of whether to "produce a good" or not. Each agent's utility depends on the number of its neighbors in the graph that produce the good, as well as on its own action. This dependence can be captured by a "pattern" $T:{\rm I\!N}\rightarrow\{0,1\}$ that describes an agent's best response to every possible number of neighbors that produce the good. Answering a question of [Papadimitriou and Peng, 2021], we prove that for some simple pattern $T$ the problem of determining whether a non-trivial pure Nash equilibrium exists is NP-complete. We extend our result to a wide class of such $T$, but also find a new polynomial time algorithm for some specific simple pattern $T$. We leave open the goal of characterizing the complexity for all patterns.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv
Finding a Hidden Edge
We consider the problem of finding an edge in a hidden undirected graph $G = (V, E)$ with $n$ vertices, in a model where we only allowed queries that ask whether or not a subset of vertices contains an edge. We study the non-adaptive model and show that while in the deterministic model the optimal algorithm requires $\binom{n}{2}$ queries (i.e., querying for any possible edge separately), in the randomized model $\tildeΘ(n)$ queries are sufficient (and needed) in order to find an edge. In addition, we study the query complexity for specific families of graphs, including Stars, Cliques, and Matchings, for both the randomized and deterministic models. Lastly, for general graphs, we show a trade-off between the query complexity and the number of rounds, $r$, made by an adaptive algorithm. We present two algorithms with $O(rn^{2/r})$ and $\tilde{O}(rn^{1/r})$ sample complexity for the deterministic and randomized models, respectively.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv
Bipartite Perfect Matching as a Real Polynomial
We obtain a description of the Bipartite Perfect Matching decision problem as a multilinear polynomial over the Reals. We show that it has full degree and $(1-o_n(1))\cdot 2^{n^2}$ monomials with non-zero coefficients. In contrast, we show that in the dual representation (switching the roles of 0 and 1) the number of monomials is only exponential in $Θ(n \log n)$. Our proof relies heavily on the fact that the lattice of graphs which are "matching-covered" is Eulerian.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv
Matching for the Israeli "Mechinot" Gap-Year Programs: Handling Rich Diversity Requirements
We describe our experience with designing and running a matching market for the Israeli "Mechinot" gap-year programs. The main conceptual challenge in the design of this market was the rich set of diversity considerations, which necessitated the development of an appropriate preference-specification language along with corresponding choice-function semantics, which we also theoretically analyze. Our contribution extends the existing toolbox for two-sided matching with soft constraints. This market was run for the first time in January 2018 and matched 1,607 candidates (out of a total of 3,120 candidates) to 35 different programs, has been run twice more since, and has been adopted by the Joint Council of the "Mechinot" gap-year programs for the foreseeable future.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv
On the Effectiveness of Tracking and Testing in SEIR Models
We study the effectiveness of tracking and testing in mitigating or suppressing epidemic outbreaks, in combination with or as an alternative to quarantines and global lockdowns. We study these intervention methods on a network-based SEIR model, augmented with an additional probability to model symptomatic, asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases. Our focus is on the basic trade-offs between economic costs and human lives lost, and how these trade-offs change under different lockdown, quarantine, tracking and testing policies. Our main findings are as follows: (i) Tests combined with patient quarantines reduce both economic costs and mortality, but require a large-scale testing capacity to achieve a significant improvement; (ii) Tracking significantly reduces both economic costs and mortality; (iii) Tracking combined with a limited number of tests can achieve containment without lockdowns; (iv) If there is a small flow of new incoming infections, dynamic "On-Off" lockdowns are more efficient than fixed lockdowns. Our simulation results underline the extreme effectiveness of tracking and testing policies in reducing both economic costs and mortality and their potential to contain epidemic outbreaks without imposing social distancing restrictions. This highlights the difficult social question of trading-off these gains with the privacy loss that tracking necessarily entails.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access