BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Nicole Megow

Nicole Megow contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Configuration Balancing for Stochastic Requests

The configuration balancing problem with stochastic requests generalizes many well-studied resource allocation problems such as load balancing and virtual circuit routing. In it, we have $m$ resources and $n$ requests. Each request has multiple possible configurations, each of which increases the load of each resource by some amount. The goal is to select one configuration for each request to minimize the makespan: the load of the most-loaded resource. In our work, we focus on a stochastic setting, where we only know the distribution for how each configuration increases the resource loads, learning the realized value only after a configuration is chosen. We develop both offline and online algorithms for configuration balancing with stochastic requests. When the requests are known offline, we give a non-adaptive policy for configuration balancing with stochastic requests that $O(\frac{\log m}{\log \log m})$-approximates the optimal adaptive policy. In particular, this closes the adaptivity gap for this problem as there is an asymptotically matching lower bound even for the very special case of load balancing on identical machines. When requests arrive online in a list, we give a non-adaptive policy that is $O(\log m)$ competitive. Again, this result is asymptotically tight due to information-theoretic lower bounds for very special cases (e.g., for load balancing on unrelated machines). Finally, we show how to leverage adaptivity in the special case of load balancing on related machines to obtain a constant-factor approximation offline and an $O(\log \log m)$-approximation online. A crucial technical ingredient in all of our results is a new structural characterization of the optimal adaptive policy that allows us to limit the correlations between its decisions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Learning-Augmented Query Policies for Minimum Spanning Tree with Uncertainty

We study how to utilize (possibly erroneous) predictions in a model for computing under uncertainty in which an algorithm can query unknown data. Our aim is to minimize the number of queries needed to solve the minimum spanning tree problem, a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem that has been central also to the research area of explorable uncertainty. For all integral $γ\ge 2$, we present algorithms that are $γ$-robust and $(1+\frac{1}γ)$-consistent, meaning that they use at most $γOPT$ queries if the predictions are arbitrarily wrong and at most $(1+\frac{1}γ)OPT$ queries if the predictions are correct, where $OPT$ is the optimal number of queries for the given instance. Moreover, we show that this trade-off is best possible. Furthermore, we argue that a suitably defined hop distance is a useful measure for the amount of prediction error and design algorithms with performance guarantees that degrade smoothly with the hop distance. We also show that the predictions are PAC-learnable in our model. Our results demonstrate that untrusted predictions can circumvent the known lower bound of~$2$, without any degradation of the worst-case ratio. To obtain our results, we provide new structural insights for the minimum spanning tree problem that might be useful in the context of query-based algorithms regardless of predictions. In particular, we generalize the concept of witness sets -- the key to lower-bounding the optimum -- by proposing novel global witness set structures and completely new ways of adaptively using those.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Permutation Predictions for Non-Clairvoyant Scheduling

In non-clairvoyant scheduling, the task is to find an online strategy for scheduling jobs with a priori unknown processing requirements with the objective to minimize the total (weighted) completion time. We revisit this well-studied problem in a recently popular learning-augmented setting that integrates (untrusted) predictions in online algorithm design. While previous works used predictions on processing requirements, we propose a new prediction model, which provides a relative order of jobs which could be seen as predicting algorithmic actions rather than parts of the unknown input. We show that these predictions have desired properties, admit a natural error measure as well as algorithms with strong performance guarantees and that they are learnable in both, theory and practice. We generalize the algorithmic framework proposed in the seminal paper by Kumar et al. (NeurIPS'18) and present the first learning-augmented scheduling results for weighted jobs and unrelated machines. We demonstrate in empirical experiments the practicability and superior performance compared to the previously suggested single-machine algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Speed-Robust Scheduling -- Sand, Bricks, and Rocks

The speed-robust scheduling problem is a two-stage problem where given $m$ machines, jobs must be grouped into at most $m$ bags while the processing speeds of the given $m$ machines are unknown. After the speeds are revealed, the grouped jobs must be assigned to the machines without being separated. To evaluate the performance of algorithms, we determine upper bounds on the worst-case ratio of the algorithm's makespan and the optimal makespan given full information. We refer to this ratio as the robustness factor. We give an algorithm with a robustness factor $2-1/m$ for the most general setting and improve this to $1.8$ for equal-size jobs. For the special case of infinitesimal jobs, we give an algorithm with an optimal robustness factor equal to $e/(e-1) \approx 1.58$. The particular machine environment in which all machines have either speed $0$ or $1$ was studied before by Stein and Zhong (SODA 2019). For this setting, we provide an algorithm for scheduling infinitesimal jobs with an optimal robustness factor of $(1+\sqrt{2})/2 \approx 1.207$. It lays the foundation for an algorithm matching the lower bound of $4/3$ for equal-size jobs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An Adversarial Model for Scheduling with Testing

We introduce a novel adversarial model for scheduling with explorable uncertainty. In this model, the processing time of a job can potentially be reduced (by an a priori unknown amount) by testing the job. Testing a job $j$ takes one unit of time and may reduce its processing time from the given upper limit $\bar{p}_j$ (which is the time taken to execute the job if it is not tested) to any value between $0$ and $\bar{p}_j$. This setting is motivated e.g. by applications where a code optimizer can be run on a job before executing it. We consider the objective of minimizing the sum of completion times on a single machine. All jobs are available from the start, but the reduction in their processing times as a result of testing is unknown, making this an online problem that is amenable to competitive analysis. The need to balance the time spent on tests and the time spent on job executions adds a novel flavor to the problem. We give the first and nearly tight lower and upper bounds on the competitive ratio for deterministic and randomized algorithms. We also show that minimizing the makespan is a considerably easier problem for which we give optimal deterministic and randomized online algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Online Minimum Cost Matching on the Line with Recourse

In online minimum cost matching on the line, $n$ requests appear one by one and have to be matched immediately and irrevocably to a given set of servers, all on the real line. The goal is to minimize the sum of distances from the requests to their respective servers. Despite all research efforts, it remains an intriguing open question whether there exists an $O(1)$-competitive algorithm. The best known online algorithm by Raghvendra [SoCG18] achieves a competitive factor of $Θ(\log n)$. This result matches a lower bound of $Ω(\log n)$ [Latin18] that holds for a quite large class of online algorithms, including all deterministic algorithms in the literature. In this work we approach the problem in a recourse model where we allow to revoke online decisions to some extent. We show an $O(1)$-competitive algorithm for online matching on the line that uses at most $O(n\log n)$ reassignments. This is the first non-trivial result for min-cost bipartite matching with recourse. For so-called alternating instances, with no more than one request between two servers, we obtain a near-optimal result. We give a $(1+\varepsilon)$-competitive algorithm that reassigns any request at most $O(\varepsilon^{-1.001})$ times. This special case is interesting as the aforementioned quite general lower bound $Ω(\log n)$ holds for such instances.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Competitive-Ratio Approximation Schemes for Minimizing the Makespan in the Online-List Model

We consider online scheduling on multiple machines for jobs arriving one-by-one with the objective of minimizing the makespan. For any number of identical parallel or uniformly related machines, we provide a competitive-ratio approximation scheme that computes an online algorithm whose competitive ratio is arbitrarily close to the best possible competitive ratio. We also determine this value up to any desired accuracy. This is the first application of competitive-ratio approximation schemes in the online-list model. The result proves the applicability of the concept in different online models. We expect that it fosters further research on other online problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

A New Approach to Online Scheduling: Approximating the Optimal Competitive Ratio

We propose a new approach to competitive analysis in online scheduling by introducing the novel concept of competitive-ratio approximation schemes. Such a scheme algorithmically constructs an online algorithm with a competitive ratio arbitrarily close to the best possible competitive ratio for any online algorithm. We study the problem of scheduling jobs online to minimize the weighted sum of completion times on parallel, related, and unrelated machines, and we derive both deterministic and randomized algorithms which are almost best possible among all online algorithms of the respective settings. We also generalize our techniques to arbitrary monomial cost functions and apply them to the makespan objective. Our method relies on an abstract characterization of online algorithms combined with various simplifications and transformations. We also contribute algorithmic means to compute the actual value of the best possi- ble competitive ratio up to an arbitrary accuracy. This strongly contrasts all previous manually obtained competitiveness results for algorithms and, most importantly, it reduces the search for the optimal com- petitive ratio to a question that a computer can answer. We believe that our concept can also be applied to many other problems and yields a new perspective on online algorithms in general.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The Sorting Buffer Problem is NP-hard

We consider the offline sorting buffer problem. The input is a sequence of items of different types. All items must be processed one by one by a server. The server is equipped with a random-access buffer of limited capacity which can be used to rearrange items. The problem is to design a scheduling strategy that decides upon the order in which items from the buffer are sent to the server. Each type change incurs unit cost, and thus, the cost minimizing objective is to minimize the total number of type changes for serving the entire sequence. This problem is motivated by various applications in manufacturing processes and computer science, and it has attracted significant attention in the last few years. The main focus has been on online competitive algorithms. Surprisingly little is known on the basic offline problem. In this paper, we show that the sorting buffer problem with uniform cost is NP-hard and, thus, close one of the most fundamental questions for the offline problem. On the positive side, we give an O(1)-approximation algorithm when the scheduler is given a buffer only slightly larger than double the original size. We also give a dynamic programming algorithm for the special case of buffer size two that solves the problem exactly in linear time, improving on the standard DP which runs in cubic time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access