Source author record

Nick Fischer

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Data Structures and Algorithms Computational Complexity Discrete Mathematics math.RT

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2026arXiv

A Truly Subcubic Combinatorial Algorithm for Induced 4-Cycle Detection

We present the first truly subcubic, combinatorial algorithm for detecting an induced $4$ -cycle in a graph. The running time is $O(n^{2.84})$ on $n$ -node graphs, thus separating the task of detecting induced $4$ -cycles from detecting triangles, which requires $n^{3-o(1)}$ time combinatorially under the popular BMM hypothesis. Significant work has gone into characterizing the exact time complexity of induced $H$ -detection, relative to the complexity of detecting cliques of various sizes. Prior work identified the question of whether induced $4$ -cycle detection is triangle-hard as the only remaining case towards completing the lowest level of the classification, dubbing it a "curious" case [Dalirrooyfard, Vassilevska W., FOCS 2022]. Our result can be seen as a negative resolution of this question. Our algorithm deviates from previous techniques in the large body of subgraph detection algorithms and employs the trendy topic of graph decomposition that has hitherto been restricted to more global problems (as in the use of expander decompositions for flow problems) or to shaving subpolynomial factors (as in the application of graph regularity lemmas). While our algorithm is slower than the (non-combinatorial) state-of-the-art $\tilde{O}(n^ω)$ -time algorithm based on polynomial identity testing [Vassilevska W., Wang, Williams, Yu, SODA 2014], combinatorial advancements often come with other benefits. In particular, we give the first nontrivial deterministic algorithm for detecting induced $4$ -cycles.

preprint2022arXiv

A Structural Investigation of the Approximability of Polynomial-Time Problems

We initiate the systematic study of a recently introduced polynomial-time analogue of MaxSNP, which includes a large number of well-studied problems (including Nearest and Furthest Neighbor in the Hamming metric, Maximum Inner Product, optimization variants of $k$ -XOR and Maximum $k$ -Cover). Specifically, MaxSP $_k$ denotes the class of $O(m^k)$ -time problems of the form $\max_{x_1,\dots, x_k} \#\{y:ϕ(x_1,\dots,x_k,y)\}$ where $ϕ$ is a quantifier-free first-order property and $m$ denotes the size of the relational structure. Assuming central hypotheses about clique detection in hypergraphs and MAX3SAT, we show that for any MaxSP $_k$ problem definable by a quantifier-free $m$ -edge graph formula $ϕ$ , the best possible approximation guarantee in faster-than-exhaustive-search time $O(m^{k-δ})$ falls into one of four categories: * optimizable to exactness in time $O(m^{k-δ})$ , * an (inefficient) approximation scheme, i.e., a $(1+ε)$ -approximation in time $O(m^{k-f(ε)})$ , * a (fixed) constant-factor approximation in time $O(m^{k-δ})$ , or * an $m^ε$ -approximation in time $O(m^{k-f(ε)})$ . We obtain an almost complete characterization of these regimes, for MaxSP $_k$ as well as for an analogously defined minimization class MinSP $_k$ . As our main technical contribution, we rule out approximation schemes for a large class of problems admitting constant-factor approximations, under the Sparse MAX3SAT hypothesis posed by (Alman, Vassilevska Williams'20). As general trends for the problems we consider, we find: (1) Exact optimizability has a simple algebraic characterization, (2) only few maximization problems do not admit a constant-factor approximation; these do not even have a subpolynomial-factor approximation, and (3) constant-factor approximation of minimization problems is equivalent to deciding whether the optimum is equal to 0.

preprint2020arXiv

Faster Minimization of Tardy Processing Time on a Single Machine

This paper is concerned with the $1||\sum p_jU_j$ problem, the problem of minimizing the total processing time of tardy jobs on a single machine. This is not only a fundamental scheduling problem, but also a very important problem from a theoretical point of view as it generalizes the Subset Sum problem and is closely related to the 0/1-Knapsack problem. The problem is well-known to be NP-hard, but only in a weak sense, meaning it admits pseudo-polynomial time algorithms. The fastest known pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for the problem is the famous Lawler and Moore algorithm which runs in $O(P \cdot n)$ time, where $P$ is the total processing time of all $n$ jobs in the input. This algorithm has been developed in the late 60s, and has yet to be improved to date. In this paper we develop two new algorithms for $1||\sum p_jU_j$ , each improving on Lawler and Moore's algorithm in a different scenario. Both algorithms rely on basic primitive operations between sets of integers and vectors of integers for the speedup in their running times. The second algorithm relies on fast polynomial multiplication as its main engine, while for the first algorithm we define a new "skewed" version of $(\max,\min)$ -convolution which is interesting in its own right.

preprint2020arXiv

The Computational Complexity of Plethysm Coefficients

In two papers, Bürgisser and Ikenmeyer (STOC 2011, STOC 2013) used an adaption of the geometric complexity theory (GCT) approach by Mulmuley and Sohoni (Siam J Comput 2001, 2008) to prove lower bounds on the border rank of the matrix multiplication tensor. A key ingredient was information about certain Kronecker coefficients. While tensors are an interesting test bed for GCT ideas, the far-away goal is the separation of algebraic complexity classes. The role of the Kronecker coefficients in that setting is taken by the so-called plethysm coefficients: These are the multiplicities in the coordinate rings of spaces of polynomials. Even though several hardness results for Kronecker coefficients are known, there are almost no results about the complexity of computing the plethysm coefficients or even deciding their positivity. In this paper we show that deciding positivity of plethysm coefficients is NP-hard, and that computing plethysm coefficients is #P-hard. In fact, both problems remain hard even if the inner parameter of the plethysm coefficient is fixed. In this way we obtain an inner versus outer contrast: If the outer parameter of the plethysm coefficient is fixed, then the plethysm coefficient can be computed in polynomial time. Moreover, we derive new lower and upper bounds and in special cases even combinatorial descriptions for plethysm coefficients, which we consider to be of independent interest. Our technique uses discrete tomography in a more refined way than the recent work on Kronecker coefficients by Ikenmeyer, Mulmuley, and Walter (Comput Compl 2017). This makes our work the first to apply techniques from discrete tomography to the study of plethysm coefficients. Quite surprisingly, that interpretation also leads to new equalities between certain plethysm coefficients and Kronecker coefficients.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.