BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Christian Ikenmeyer

Christian Ikenmeyer appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational Complexitymath.RTmath.AGmath.COmath.RAmath.ACmath.GRquant-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

22works
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

22 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

What is in #P and what is not?

For several classical nonnegative integer functions, we investigate if they are members of the counting complexity class #P or not. We prove #P membership in surprising cases, and in other cases we prove non-membership, relying on standard complexity assumptions or on oracle separations. We initiate the study of the polynomial closure properties of #P on affine varieties, i.e., if all problem instances satisfy algebraic constraints. This is directly linked to classical combinatorial proofs of algebraic identities and inequalities. We investigate #TFNP and obtain oracle separations that prove the strict inclusion of #P in all standard syntactic subclasses of #TFNP-1.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

On the complexity of evaluating highest weight vectors

Geometric complexity theory (GCT) is an approach towards separating algebraic complexity classes through algebraic geometry and representation theory. Originally Mulmuley and Sohoni proposed (SIAM J Comput 2001, 2008) to use occurrence obstructions to prove Valiant's determinant vs permanent conjecture, but recently Bürgisser, Ikenmeyer, and Panova (Journal of the AMS 2019) proved this impossible. However, fundamental theorems of algebraic geometry and representation theory grant that every lower bound in GCT can be proved by the use of so-called highest weight vectors (HWVs). In the setting of interest in GCT (namely in the setting of polynomials) we prove the NP-hardness of the evaluation of HWVs in general, and we give efficient algorithms if the treewidth of the corresponding Young-diagram is small, where the point of evaluation is concisely encoded as a noncommutative algebraic branching program! In particular, this gives a large new class of separating functions that can be efficiently evaluated at points with low (border) Waring rank.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Algebraic Branching Programs, Border Complexity, and Tangent Spaces

Nisan showed in 1991 that the width of a smallest noncommutative single-(source,sink) algebraic branching program (ABP) to compute a noncommutative polynomial is given by the ranks of specific matrices. This means that the set of noncommutative polynomials with ABP width complexity at most $k$ is Zariski-closed, an important property in geometric complexity theory. It follows that approximations cannot help to reduce the required ABP width. It was mentioned by Forbes that this result would probably break when going from single-(source,sink) ABPs to trace ABPs. We prove that this is correct. Moreover, we study the commutative monotone setting and prove a result similar to Nisan, but concerning the analytic closure. We observe the same behavior here: The set of polynomials with ABP width complexity at most $k$ is closed for single-(source,sink) ABPs and not closed for trace ABPs. The proofs reveal an intriguing connection between tangent spaces and the vector space of flows on the ABP. We close with additional observations on VQP and the closure of VNP which allows us to establish a separation between the two classes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Hyperpfaffians and Geometric Complexity Theory

The hyperpfaffian polynomial was introduced by Barvinok in 1995 as a natural generalization of the well-known Pfaffian polynomial to higher order tensors. We prove that the hyperpfaffian is the unique smallest degree SL-invariant on the space of higher order tensors. We then study the hyperpfaffian's computational complexity and prove that it is VNP-complete. This disproves a conjecture of Mulmuley in geometric complexity theory about the computational complexity of invariant rings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Search problems in algebraic complexity, GCT, and hardness of generator for invariant rings

We consider the problem of computing succinct encodings of lists of generators for invariant rings for group actions. Mulmuley conjectured that there are always polynomial sized such encodings for invariant rings of $\SL_n(\C)$-representations. We provide simple examples that disprove this conjecture (under standard complexity assumptions). We develop a general framework, denoted \emph{algebraic circuit search problems}, that captures many important problems in algebraic complexity and computational invariant theory. This framework encompasses various proof systems in proof complexity and some of the central problems in invariant theory as exposed by the Geometric Complexity Theory (GCT) program, including the aforementioned problem of computing succinct encodings for generators for invariant rings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Computational Complexity of Plethysm Coefficients

In two papers, Bürgisser and Ikenmeyer (STOC 2011, STOC 2013) used an adaption of the geometric complexity theory (GCT) approach by Mulmuley and Sohoni (Siam J Comput 2001, 2008) to prove lower bounds on the border rank of the matrix multiplication tensor. A key ingredient was information about certain Kronecker coefficients. While tensors are an interesting test bed for GCT ideas, the far-away goal is the separation of algebraic complexity classes. The role of the Kronecker coefficients in that setting is taken by the so-called plethysm coefficients: These are the multiplicities in the coordinate rings of spaces of polynomials. Even though several hardness results for Kronecker coefficients are known, there are almost no results about the complexity of computing the plethysm coefficients or even deciding their positivity. In this paper we show that deciding positivity of plethysm coefficients is NP-hard, and that computing plethysm coefficients is #P-hard. In fact, both problems remain hard even if the inner parameter of the plethysm coefficient is fixed. In this way we obtain an inner versus outer contrast: If the outer parameter of the plethysm coefficient is fixed, then the plethysm coefficient can be computed in polynomial time. Moreover, we derive new lower and upper bounds and in special cases even combinatorial descriptions for plethysm coefficients, which we consider to be of independent interest. Our technique uses discrete tomography in a more refined way than the recent work on Kronecker coefficients by Ikenmeyer, Mulmuley, and Walter (Comput Compl 2017). This makes our work the first to apply techniques from discrete tomography to the study of plethysm coefficients. Quite surprisingly, that interpretation also leads to new equalities between certain plethysm coefficients and Kronecker coefficients.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

On the complexity of hazard-free circuits

The problem of constructing hazard-free Boolean circuits dates back to the 1940s and is an important problem in circuit design. Our main lower-bound result unconditionally shows the existence of functions whose circuit complexity is polynomially bounded while every hazard-free implementation is provably of exponential size. Previous lower bounds on the hazard-free complexity were only valid for depth 2 circuits. The same proof method yields that every subcubic implementation of Boolean matrix multiplication must have hazards. These results follow from a crucial structural insight: Hazard-free complexity is a natural generalization of monotone complexity to all (not necessarily monotone) Boolean functions. Thus, we can apply known monotone complexity lower bounds to find lower bounds on the hazard-free complexity. We also lift these methods from the monotone setting to prove exponential hazard-free complexity lower bounds for non-monotone functions. As our main upper-bound result we show how to efficiently convert a Boolean circuit into a bounded-bit hazard-free circuit with only a polynomially large blow-up in the number of gates. Previously, the best known method yielded exponentially large circuits in the worst case, so our algorithm gives an exponential improvement. As a side result we establish the NP-completeness of several hazard detection problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On the complexity of the permanent in various computational models

We answer a question in [Landsberg, Ressayre, 2015], showing the regular determinantal complexity of the determinant det_m is O(m^3). We answer questions in, and generalize results of [Aravind, Joglekar, 2015], showing there is no rank one determinantal expression for perm_m or det_m when m >= 3. Finally we state and prove several "folklore" results relating different models of computation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On the relative power of reduction notions in arithmetic circuit complexity

We show that the two main reduction notions in arithmetic circuit complexity, p-projections and c-reductions, differ in power. We do so by showing unconditionally that there are polynomials that are VNP-complete under c-reductions but not under p-projections. We also show that the question of which polynomials are VNP-complete under which type of reductions depends on the underlying field.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The geometry of rank decompositions of matrix multiplication I: 2x2 matrices

This is the first in a series of papers on rank decompositions of the matrix multiplication tensor. In this paper we: establish general facts about rank decompositions of tensors, describe potential ways to search for new matrix multiplication decompositions, give a geometric proof of the theorem of Burichenko's theorem establishing the symmetry group of Strassen's algorithm, and present two particularly nice subfamilies in the Strassen family of decompositions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Complexity of linear circuits and geometry

We use algebraic geometry to study matrix rigidity, and more generally, the complexity of computing a matrix-vector product, continuing a study initiated by Kumar, et. al. We (i) exhibit many non-obvious equations testing for (border) rigidity, (ii) compute degrees of varieties associated to rigidity, (iii) describe algebraic varieties associated to families of matrices that are expected to have super-linear rigidity, and (iv) prove results about the ideals and degrees of cones that are of interest in their own right.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Fundamental invariants of orbit closures

For several objects of interest in geometric complexity theory, namely for the determinant, the permanent, the product of variables, the power sum, the unit tensor, and the matrix multiplication tensor, we introduce and study a fundamental SL-invariant function that relates the coordinate ring of the orbit with the coordinate ring of its closure. For the power sums we can write down this fundamental invariant explicitly in most cases. Our constructions generalize the two Aronhold invariants on ternary cubics. For the other objects we identify the invariant function conditional on intriguing combinatorial problems much like the well-known Alon-Tarsi conjecture on Latin squares. We provide computer calculations in small dimensions for these cases. As a main tool for our analysis, we determine the stabilizers, and we establish the polystability of all the mentioned forms and tensors (including the generic ones).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Symmetrizing Tableaux and the 5th case of the Foulkes Conjecture

The Foulkes conjecture states that the multiplicities in the plethysm Sym^a(Sym^b V) are at most as large as the multiplicities in the plethysm Sym^b(Sym^a V) for all a <= b. This conjecture has been known to be true for a <= 4. The main result of this paper is its verification for a = 5. This is achieved by performing a combinatorial calculation on a computer and using a propagation theorem of Tom McKay from 2008. Moreover, we obtain a complete representation theoretic decomposition of the vanishing ideal of the 5th Chow variety in degree 5, we show that there are no degree 5 equations for the 6th Chow variety, and we also find some representation theoretic degree 6 equations for the 6th Chow variety.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The Saxl Conjecture and the Dominance Order

In 2012 Jan Saxl conjectured that all irreducible representations of the symmetric group occur in the decomposition of the tensor square of the irreducible representation corresponding to the staircase partition. We make progress on this conjecture by proving the occurrence of all those irreducibles which correspond to partitions that are comparable to the staircase partition in the dominance order. Moreover, we use our result to show the occurrence of all irreducibles corresponding to hook partitions. This generalizes results by Pak, Panova, and Vallejo from 2013.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Deciding Positivity of Littlewood-Richardson Coefficients

Starting with Knutson and Tao's hive model (in J. Amer. Math. Soc., 1999) we characterize the Littlewood-Richardson coefficient $c_{λ,μ}^ν$ of given partitions $λ,μ,ν\in N^n$ as the number of capacity achieving hive flows on the honeycomb graph. Based on this, we design a polynomial time algorithm for deciding $c_{λ,μ}^ν>0$. This algorithm is easy to state and takes $O(n^3 \log ν_1)$ arithmetic operations and comparisons. We further show that the capacity achieving hive flows can be seen as the vertices of a connected graph, which leads to new structural insights into Littlewood-Richardson coefficients.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Equations for lower bounds on border rank

We present new methods for determining polynomials in the ideal of the variety of bilinear maps of border rank at most r. We apply these methods to several cases including the case r = 6 in the space of bilinear maps C^4 x C^4 -> C^4. This space of bilinear maps includes the matrix multiplication operator M_2 for two by two matrices. We show these newly obtained polynomials do not vanish on the matrix multiplication operator M_2, which gives a new proof that the border rank of the multiplication of 2 x 2 matrices is seven. Other examples are considered along with an explanation of how to implement the methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Explicit Lower Bounds via Geometric Complexity Theory

We prove the lower bound R(M_m) \geq 3/2 m^2 - 2 on the border rank of m x m matrix multiplication by exhibiting explicit representation theoretic (occurence) obstructions in the sense of the geometric complexity theory (GCT) program. While this bound is weaker than the one recently obtained by Landsberg and Ottaviani, these are the first significant lower bounds obtained within the GCT program. Behind the proof is the new combinatorial concept of obstruction designs, which encode highest weight vectors in Sym^d\otimes^3(C^n)^* and provide new insights into Kronecker coefficients.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Small Littlewood-Richardson coefficients

We develop structural insights into the Littlewood-Richardson graph, whose number of vertices equals the Littlewood-Richardson coefficient c(λ,μ,ν) for given partitions λ, μ, and ν. This graph was first introduced by Bürgisser and Ikenmeyer in arXiv:1204.2484, where its connectedness was proved. Our insights are useful for the design of algorithms for computing the Littlewood-Richardson coefficient: We design an algorithm for the exact computation of c(λ,μ,ν) with running time O(c(λ,μ,ν)^2 poly(n)), where λ, μ, and ν are partitions of length at most n. Moreover, we introduce an algorithm for deciding whether c(λ,μ,ν) >= t whose running time is O(t^2 poly(n)). Even the existence of a polynomial-time algorithm for deciding whether c(λ,μ,ν) >= 2 is a nontrivial new result on its own. Our insights also lead to the proof of a conjecture by King, Tollu, and Toumazet posed in 2004, stating that c(λ,μ,ν) = 2 implies c(Mλ,Mμ,Mν) = M + 1 for all M. Here, the stretching of partitions is defined componentwise.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Even Partitions in Plethysms

We prove that for all natural numbers k,n,d with k <= d and every partition lambda of size kn with at most k parts there exists an irreducible GL(d, C)-representation of highest weight 2*lambda in the plethysm Sym^k(Sym^(2n) (C^d)). This gives an affirmative answer to a conjecture by Weintraub (J. Algebra, 129 (1):103-114, 1990). Our investigation is motivated by questions of geometric complexity theory and uses ideas from quantum information theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Geometric Complexity Theory and Tensor Rank

Mulmuley and Sohoni (GCT1 in SICOMP 2001, GCT2 in SICOMP 2008) proposed to view the permanent versus determinant problem as a specific orbit closure problem and to attack it by methods from geometric invariant and representation theory. We adopt these ideas towards the goal of showing lower bounds on the border rank of specific tensors, in particular for matrix multiplication. We thus study specific orbit closure problems for the group $G = GL(W_1)\times GL(W_2)\times GL(W_3)$ acting on the tensor product $W=W_1\otimes W_2\otimes W_3$ of complex finite dimensional vector spaces. Let $G_s = SL(W_1)\times SL(W_2)\times SL(W_3)$. A key idea from GCT2 is that the irreducible $G_s$-representations occurring in the coordinate ring of the $G$-orbit closure of a stable tensor $w\in W$ are exactly those having a nonzero invariant with respect to the stabilizer group of $w$. However, we prove that by considering $G_s$-representations, as suggested in GCT1-2, only trivial lower bounds on border rank can be shown. It is thus necessary to study $G$-representations, which leads to geometric extension problems that are beyond the scope of the subgroup restriction problems emphasized in GCT1-2. We prove a very modest lower bound on the border rank of matrix multiplication tensors using $G$-representations. This shows at least that the barrier for $G_s$-representations can be overcome. To advance, we suggest the coarser approach to replace the semigroup of representations of a tensor by its moment polytope. We prove first results towards determining the moment polytopes of matrix multiplication and unit tensors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access