Source author record

Ngai-Ching Wong

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

17works
4topics
4close collaborators

Published work

17 publications

preprint2020arXiv

On a variant of Tingley's problem for some function spaces

Let (Ω,A,μ)(Ω, \mathfrak{A}, μ) and (Γ,B,ν)(Γ, \mathfrak{B}, ν) be two arbitrary measure spaces, and p∈[1,∞]p\in [1,\infty]. Set Lp(μ)+sp:={f∈Lp(μ):∥f∥p=1;f≥0 μ-a.e.}L^p(μ)_+^\mathrm{sp}:= \{f\in L^p(μ): \|f\|_p =1; f\geq 0\ μ\text{-a.e.} \} i.e., the positive part of the unit sphere of Lp(μ)L^p(μ). We show that every metric preserving bijection Φ:Lp(μ)+sp→Lp(ν)+spΦ: L^p(μ)_+^\mathrm{sp} \to L^p(ν)_+^\mathrm{sp} can be extended (necessarily uniquely) to an isometric order isomorphism from Lp(μ)L^p(μ) onto Lp(ν)L^p(ν). A Lamperti form, i.e., a weighted composition like form, of ΦΦ is provided, when (Γ,B,ν)(Γ, \mathfrak{B}, ν) is localizable (in particular, when it is σσ-finite). On the other hand, we show that for compact Hausdorff spaces XX and YY, if ΦΦ is a metric preserving bijection from the positive part of the unit sphere of C(X)C(X) to that of C(Y)C(Y), then there is a homeomorphism τ:Y→Xτ:Y\to X satisfying Φ(f)(y)=f(τ(y))Φ(f)(y) = f(τ(y)) (f∈C(X)+sp;y∈Yf\in C(X)_+^\mathrm{sp}; y\in Y).

preprint2016arXiv

A Murray-von Neumann type classification of C∗C^*-algebras

We define type A\mathfrak{A}, type B\mathfrak{B}, type C\mathfrak{C} as well as C*-semi-finite C*-algebras. It is shown that a von Neumann algebra is a type A\mathfrak{A}, type B\mathfrak{B}, type C\mathfrak{C} or C*-semi-finite C*-algebra if and only if it is, respectively, a type I, type II, type III or semi-finite von Neumann algebra. Any type I C*-algebra is of type A\mathfrak{A} (actually, type A\mathfrak{A} coincides with the discreteness as defined by Peligrad and Zsido), and any type II C*-algebra (as defined by Cuntz and Pedersen) is of type B\mathfrak{B}. Moreover, any type C\mathfrak{C} C*-algebra is of type III (in the sense of Cuntz and Pedersen). Furthermore, any purely infinite C*-algebra (in the sense of Kirchberg and Rordam) with real rank zero is of type C\mathfrak{C}, and any separable purely infinite C*-algebra with stable rank one is also of type C\mathfrak{C}. We also prove that type A\mathfrak{A}, type B\mathfrak{B}, type C\mathfrak{C} and C*-semi-finiteness are stable under taking hereditary C*-subalgebras, multiplier algebras and strong Morita equivalence. Furthermore, any C*-algebra AA contains a largest type A\mathfrak{A} closed ideal JAJ_\mathfrak{A}, a largest type B\mathfrak{B} closed ideal JBJ_\mathfrak{B}, a largest type C\mathfrak{C} closed ideal JCJ_\mathfrak{C} as well as a largest C*-semi-finite closed ideal JsfJ_\mathfrak{sf}. Among them, we have JA+JBJ_\mathfrak{A} + J_\mathfrak{B} being an essential ideal of JsfJ_\mathfrak{sf}, and JA+JB+JCJ_\mathfrak{A} + J_\mathfrak{B} + J_\mathfrak{C} being an essential ideal of AA. On the other hand, A/JCA/J_\mathfrak{C} is always C*-semi-finite, and if AA is C*-semi-finite, then A/JBA/J_\mathfrak{B} is of type A\mathfrak{A}.

preprint2016arXiv

On the decomposition into Discrete, type II and type III C∗C^*-algebras

We obtained a "decomposition scheme" of C*-algebras. We show that the classes of discrete C*-algebras (as defined by Peligard and Zsido), type II C*-algebras and type III C*-algebras (both defined by Cuntz and Pedersen) form a good framework to "classify" C*-algebras. In particular, we found that these classes are closed under strong Morita equivalence, hereditary C*-subalgebras as well as taking "essential extension" and "normal quotient". Furthermore, there exist the largest discrete finite ideal Ad,1A_{d,1}, the largest discrete essentially infinite ideal Ad,∞A_{d,\infty}, the largest type II finite ideal AII,1A_{II,1}, the largest type II essentially infinite ideal AII,∞A_{II,\infty}, and the largest type III ideal AIIIA_{III} of any C*-algebra AA such that Ad,1+Ad,∞+AII,1+AII,∞+AIIIA_{d,1} + A_{d,\infty} + A_{II,1} + A_{II,\infty} + A_{III} is an essential ideal of AA. This "decomposition" extends the corresponding one for W∗W^*-algebras. We also give a closer look at C*-algebras with Hausdorff primitive spectrum, AW*-algebras as well as local multiplier algebras of C*-algebras. We find that these algebras can be decomposed into continuous fields of prime C*-algebras over a locally compact Hausdorff space, with each fiber being non-zero and of one of the five types mentioned above.

preprint2015arXiv

Transition probabilities of normal states determine the Jordan structure of a quantum system

Let Φ:S(M1)→S(M2)Φ:\mathfrak{S}(M_1)\to \mathfrak{S}(M_2) be a bijection (not assumed affine nor continuous) between the sets of normal states of two quantum systems, modelled on the self-adjoint parts of von Neumann algebras M1M_1 and M2M_2, respectively. This paper concerns with the situation when ΦΦ preserves (or partially preserves) one of the following three notions of "transition probability" on the normal state spaces: the Uhlmann transition probability PUP_U, the Raggio transition probability PBP_B and an "asymmetric transition probability" P0P_0 as defined in this article. It is shown that the two systems are isomorphic, i.e. M1M_1 and M2M_2 are Jordan ∗^*-isomorphic, if ΦΦ preserves all pairs with zero Uhlmann (respectively, Raggio or asymmetric) transition probability, i.e., for any normal states μμ and νν, we have P(Φ(μ),Φ(ν))=0if and only ifP(μ,ν)=0, P\big(Φ(μ),Φ(ν)\big) = 0 \quad \text{if and only if} \quad P(μ,ν)=0, where PP stands for PUP_U (respectively, PRP_R or P0P_0). Furthermore, as an extension of Wigner's theorem, it is shown that there is a Jordan ∗^*-isomorphism Θ:M2→M1Θ:M_2\to M_1 with Φ=Θ∗∣S(M1)Φ= Θ^*|_{\mathfrak{S}(M_1)} if and only if ΦΦ preserves the "asymmetric transition probability". This is also equivalent to ΦΦ preserving the Raggio transition probability. Consequently, if ΦΦ preserves the Raggio transition probability, it will preserve the Uhlmann transition probability as well. As another application, the sets of normal states equipped with either the usual metric, the Bures metric or "the metric induced by the self-dual cone" are complete Jordan ∗^*-invariants for the underlying von Neumann algebras.

preprint2014arXiv

Inner products and module maps of Hilbert C*-modules

Let EE and FF be two Hilbert C∗C^*-modules over C∗C^*-algebras AA and BB, respectively. Let TT be a surjective linear isometry from EE onto FF and φφ a map from AA into BB. We will prove in this paper that if the C∗C^*-algebras AA and BB are commutative, then TT preserves the inner products and TT is a module map, i.e., there exists a ∗*-isomorphism φφ between the C∗C^*-algebras such that ⟨Tx,Ty⟩=φ(⟨x,y⟩), \langle Tx,Ty\rangle=φ(\langle x,y\rangle), and T(xa)=T(x)φ(a). T(xa)=T(x)φ(a). In case AA or BB is noncommutative C∗C^*-algebra, TT may not satisfy the equations above in general. We will also give some condition such that TT preserves the inner products and TT is a module map.

preprint2014arXiv

Isometric embeddings of Banach bundles

We show in this paper that every bijective linear isometry between the continuous section spaces of two non-square Banach bundles gives rise to a Banach bundle isomorphism. This is to support our expectation that the geometric structure of the continuous section space of a Banach bundle determines completely its bundle structures. We also describe the structure of an \emph{into} isometry from a continuous section space into an other. However, we demonstrate by an example that a non-surjective linear isometry can be far away from a subbundle embedding.

preprint2014arXiv

Orthogonally additive and orthogonally multiplicative holomorphic functions of matrices

Let H:Mm→MmH:M_m\to M_m be a holomorphic function of the algebra MmM_m of complex m×mm\times m matrices. Suppose that HH is orthogonally additive and orthogonally multiplicative on self-adjoint elements. We show that either the range of HH consists of zero trace elements, or there is a scalar sequence {λn}\{λ_n\} and an invertible SS in MmM_m such that H(x)=∑n≥1λnS−1xnS,∀x∈Mm, H(x) =\sum_{n\geq 1} λ_n S^{-1}x^nS, \quad\forall x \in M_m,%\eqno{(‡)} or H(x)=∑n≥1λnS−1(xt)nS,∀x∈Mm. H(x) =\sum_{n\geq 1} λ_n S^{-1}(x^t)^nS, \quad\forall x \in M_m. Here, xtx^t is the transpose of the matrix xx. In the latter case, we always have the first representation form when HH also preserves zero products. We also discuss the cases where the domain and the range carry different dimensions.

preprint2014arXiv

The spectrum of the product of operators, and the product of their numerical ranges

We show that a compact operator AA is a multiple of a positive semi-definite operator if and only if σ(AB)⊆W(A)W(B)‾,for all (rank one) operators B. σ(AB) \subseteq \overline{W(A)W(B)}, \quad\text{for all (rank one) operators $B$}. An example of a normal operator is given to show that the equivalence conditions may fail in general. We then obtain conditions to identify other classes of operators AA so that equivalence conditions hold.

preprint2010arXiv

"Maps preserving the spectrum of generalized Jordan product of operators", and its "Addendum"

In the paper "Maps preserving the spectrum of generalized Jordan product of operators", we define a generalized Jordan products on standard operator algebras A1,A2A_1, A_2 on complex Banach spaces X1,X2X_1, X_2, respectively. This includes the usual Jordan product A1∘A2=A1A2+A2A1A_1 \circ A_2 = A_1 A_2 + A_2 A_1, and the triple {A1,A2,A3}=A1A2A3+A3A2A1\{A_1,A_2,A_3\} = A_1 A_2 A_3 + A_3 A_2 A_1. Let a map Φ:A1→A2Φ: A_1 \to A_2 prserving the spectra of the products σ(Φ(A1)∘...∘Φ(Ak))=σ(A1∘...∘Ak) σ(Φ(A_1) \circ ... \circ Φ(A_k)) = σ(A_1\circ ... \circ A_k) whenever any one of A1,...,AkA_1, ..., A_k has rank at most one. It is shown in this paper that if the range of ΦΦ contains all operators of rank at most three, then ΦΦ must be a Jordan isomorphism multiplied by an mmth root of unity. Similar results for maps between self-adjoint operators acting on Hilbert spaces are also obtained. After our paper "Maps preserving the spectrum of generalized Jordan product of operators" was published in Linear Algebra Appl. 432 (2010), 1049-1069, Jianlian Cui pointed out that some arguments in the proof of Theorem 3.1 are not entirely clear and accurate. Here we supply some details in the "Addendum".

preprint2010arXiv

Automatic continuity and C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-linearity of linear maps between C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-modules

Let ΩΩ be a locally compact Hausdorff space. We show that any local C\mathbb{C}-linear map (where "local" is a weaker notion than C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-linearity) between Banach C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-modules are "nearly C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-linear" and "nearly bounded". As an application, a local C\mathbb{C}-linear map θθ between Hilbert C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-modules is automatically C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-linear. If, in addition, ΩΩ contains no isolated point, then any C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-linear map between Hilbert C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-modules is automatically bounded. Another application is that if a sequence of maps {θn}\{θ_n\} between two Banach spaces "preserve c0c_0-sequences" (or "preserve ultra-c0c_0-sequences"), then θnθ_n is bounded for large enough nn and they have a common bound. Moreover, we will show that if θθ is a bijective "biseparating" linear map from a "full" essential Banach C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-module EE into a "full" Hilbert C0(Δ)C_0(Δ)-module FF (where ΔΔ is another locally compact Hausdorff space), then θθ is "nearly bounded" (in fact, it is automatically bounded if ΔΔ or ΩΩ contains no isolated point) and there exists a homeomorphism σ:Δ→Ωσ: Δ\rightarrow Ω such that θ(e⋅φ)=θ(e)⋅φ∘σθ(e\cdot φ) = θ(e)\cdot φ\circ σ (e∈E,φ∈C0(Ω)e\in E, φ\in C_0(Ω)).

preprint2010arXiv

Linear orthogonality preservers of Hilbert C∗C^*-modules over general C∗C^*-algebras

As a partial generalisation of the Uhlhorn theorem to Hilbert C∗C^*-modules, we show in this article that the module structure and the orthogonality structure of a Hilbert C∗C^*-module determine its Hilbert C∗C^*-module structure. In fact, we have a more general result as follows. Let AA be a C∗C^*-algebra, EE and FF be Hilbert AA-modules, and IEI_E be the ideal of AA generated by {⟨x,y⟩A:x,y∈E}\{\langle x,y\rangle_A: x,y\in E\}. If Φ:E→FΦ: E\to F is an AA-module map, not assumed to be bounded but satisfying ⟨Φ(x),Φ(y)⟩A = 0whenever⟨x,y⟩A = 0, \langle Φ(x),Φ(y)\rangle_A\ =\ 0\quad\text{whenever}\quad\langle x,y\rangle_A\ =\ 0, then there exists a unique central positive multiplier u∈M(IE)u\in M(I_E) such that ⟨Φ(x),Φ(y)⟩A = u⟨x,y⟩A(x,y∈E). \langle Φ(x), Φ(y)\rangle_A\ =\ u \langle x, y\rangle_A\qquad (x,y\in E). As a consequence, ΦΦ is automatically bounded, the induced map Φ0:E→Φ(E)‾Φ_0: E\to \overline{Φ(E)} is adjointable, and Eu1/2‾\overline{Eu^{1/2}} is isomorphic to Φ(E)‾\overline{Φ(E)} as Hilbert AA-modules. If, in addition, ΦΦ is bijective, then EE is isomorphic to FF.

preprint2010arXiv

Linear orthogonality preservers of Hilbert bundles

Due to the corresponding fact concerning Hilbert spaces, it is natural to ask if the linearity and the orthogonality structure of a Hilbert C∗C^*-module determine its C∗C^*-algebra-valued inner product. We verify this in the case when the C∗C^*-algebra is commutative (or equivalently, we consider a Hilbert bundle over a locally compact Hausdorff space). More precisely, a C\mathbb{C}-linear map θθ (not assumed to be bounded) between two Hilbert C∗C^*-modules is said to be "orthogonality preserving" if <θ(x),θ(y)>=0\left<θ(x),θ(y)\right> =0 whenever <x,y>=0\left<x,y\right> =0. We prove that if θθ is an orthogonality preserving map from a full Hilbert C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-module EE into another Hilbert C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-module FF that satisfies a weaker notion of C0(Ω)C_0(Ω)-linearity (known as "localness"), then θθ is bounded and there exists ϕ∈Cb(Ω)+ϕ\in C_b(Ω)_+ such that <θ(x),θ(y)> = ϕ⋅<x,y>,∀x,y∈E. \left<θ(x),θ(y)\right>\ =\ ϕ\cdot\left<x,y\right>, \quad \forall x,y \in E. On the other hand, if FF is a full Hilbert C∗C^*-module over another commutative C∗C^*-algebra C0(Δ)C_0(Δ), we show that a "bi-orthogonality preserving" bijective map θθ with some "local-type property" will be bounded and satisfy <θ(x),θ(y)> = ϕ⋅<x,y>∘σ,∀x,y∈E \left<θ(x),θ(y)\right>\ =\ ϕ\cdot\left<x,y\right>\circσ, \quad \forall x,y \in E where ϕ∈Cb(Ω)+ϕ\in C_b(Ω)_+ and σ:Δ→Ωσ: Δ\rightarrow Ω is a homeomorphism.

preprint1996arXiv

Into isometries of C0(X,E)C_0(X,E)'s

Suppose XX and YY are locally compact Hausdorff spaces, EE and FF are Banach spaces and FF is strictly convex. We show that every linear isometry TT from C0(X,E)C_0(X,E) {\em into} C0(Y,F)C_0(Y,F) is essentially a weighted composition operator Tf(y)=h(y)(f(φ(y)))Tf(y) = h(y) (f(φ(y))). This supplements results of Jerison (when TT is onto) and Cambern (when X,YX,Y are compact).

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.