BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Nassim Nicholas Taleb

Nassim Nicholas Taleb appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
physics.soc-phq-fin.GNq-fin.RMMethodologyApplicationsq-fin.ECq-fin.STecon.GN

Catalog footprint

What is connected

9works
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

On Single Point Forecasts for Fat-Tailed Variables

We discuss common errors and fallacies when using naive "evidence based" empiricism and point forecasts for fat-tailed variables, as well as the insufficiency of using naive first-order scientific methods for tail risk management. We use the COVID-19 pandemic as the background for the discussion and as an example of a phenomenon characterized by a multiplicative nature, and what mitigating policies must result from the statistical properties and associated risks. In doing so, we also respond to the points raised by Ioannidis et al. (2020).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Tail Risk of Contagious Diseases

Applying a modification of Extreme value Theory (thanks to a dual distribution technique by the authors on data over the past 2,500 years, we show that pandemics are extremely fat-tailed in terms of fatalities, with a marked potentially existential risk for humanity. Such a macro property should invite the use of Extreme Value Theory (EVT) rather than naive interpolations and expected averages for risk management purposes. An implication is that potential tail risk overrides conclusions on decisions derived from compartmental epidemiological models and similar approaches.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

What You See and What You Don't See: The Hidden Moments of a Probability Distribution

Empirical distributions have their in-sample maxima as natural censoring. We look at the "hidden tail", that is, the part of the distribution in excess of the maximum for a sample size of $n$. Using extreme value theory, we examine the properties of the hidden tail and calculate its moments of order $p$. The method is useful in showing how large a bias one can expect, for a given $n$, between the visible in-sample mean and the true statistical mean (or higher moments), which is considerable for $α$ close to 1. Among other properties, we note that the "hidden" moment of order $0$, that is, the exceedance probability for power law distributions, follows an exponential distribution and has for expectation $\frac{1}{n}$ regardless of the parametrization of the scale and tail index.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

On the Statistical Differences between Binary Forecasts and Real World Payoffs

What do binary (or probabilistic) forecasting abilities have to do with overall performance? We map the difference between (univariate) binary predictions, bets and "beliefs" (expressed as a specific "event" will happen/will not happen) and real-world continuous payoffs (numerical benefits or harm from an event) and show the effect of their conflation and mischaracterization in the decision-science literature. We also examine the differences under thin and fat tails. The effects are: A- Spuriousness of many psychological results particularly those documenting that humans overestimate tail probabilities and rare events, or that they overreact to fears of market crashes, ecological calamities, etc. Many perceived "biases" are just mischaracterizations by psychologists. There is also a misuse of Hayekian arguments in promoting prediction markets. We quantify such conflations with a metric for "pseudo-overestimation". B- Being a "good forecaster" in binary space doesn't lead to having a good actual performance}, and vice versa, especially under nonlinearities. A binary forecasting record is likely to be a reverse indicator under some classes of distributions. Deeper uncertainty or more complicated and realistic probability distribution worsen the conflation . C- Machine Learning: Some nonlinear payoff functions, while not lending themselves to verbalistic expressions and "forecasts", are well captured by ML or expressed in option contracts. D- Fattailedness: The difference is exacerbated in the power law classes of probability distributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

How to (Not) Estimate Gini Coefficients for Fat Tailed Variables

Direct measurements of Gini coefficients by conventional arithmetic calculations are a poor estimator, even if paradoxically, they include the entire population, as because of super-additivity they cannot lend themselves to comparisons between units of different size, and intertemporal analyses are vitiated by the population changes. The Gini of aggregated units A and B will be higher than those of A and B computed separately. This effect becomes more acute with fatness of tails. When the sample size is smaller than entire population, the error is extremely high. The conventional literature on Gini coefficients cannot be trusted and comparing countries of different sizes makes no sense; nor does it make sense to make claims of "changes in inequality" based on conventional measures. We compare the standard methodologies to the indirect methods via maximum likelihood estimation of tail exponent. We compare to the tail method which is unbiased, with considerably lower error rate. We also consider measurement errors of the tail exponent and suggest a simple but efficient methodology to calculate Gini coefficients.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On the statistical properties and tail risk of violent conflicts

We examine statistical pictures of violent conflicts over the last 2000 years, finding techniques for dealing with incompleteness and unreliability of historical data. We introduce a novel approach to apply extreme value theory to fat-tailed variables that have a remote, but nonetheless finite upper bound, by defining a corresponding unbounded dual distribution (given that potential war casualties are bounded by the world population). We apply methods from extreme value theory on the dual distribution and derive its tail properties. The dual method allows us to calculate the real mean of war casualties, which proves to be considerably larger than the sample mean, meaning severe underestimation of the tail risks of conflicts from naive observation. We analyze the robustness of our results to errors in historical reports, taking into account the unreliability of accounts by historians and absence of critical data. We study inter-arrival times between tail events and find that no particular trend can be asserted. All the statistical pictures obtained are at variance with the prevailing claims about "long peace", namely that violence has been declining over time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The Precautionary Principle (with Application to the Genetic Modification of Organisms)

We present a non-naive version of the Precautionary (PP) that allows us to avoid paranoia and paralysis by confining precaution to specific domains and problems. PP is intended to deal with uncertainty and risk in cases where the absence of evidence and the incompleteness of scientific knowledge carries profound implications and in the presence of risks of "black swans", unforeseen and unforeseable events of extreme consequence. We formalize PP, placing it within the statistical and probabilistic structure of ruin problems, in which a system is at risk of total failure, and in place of risk we use a formal fragility based approach. We make a central distinction between 1) thin and fat tails, 2) Local and systemic risks and place PP in the joint Fat Tails and systemic cases. We discuss the implications for GMOs (compared to Nuclear energy) and show that GMOs represent a public risk of global harm (while harm from nuclear energy is comparatively limited and better characterized). PP should be used to prescribe severe limits on GMOs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Where Do Thin Tails Come From?

The literature of heavy tails (typically) starts with a random walk and finds mechanisms that lead to fat tails under aggregation. We follow the inverse route and show how starting with fat tails we get to thin-tails when deriving the probability distribution of the response to a random variable. We introduce a general dose-response curve and argue that the left and right-boundedness or saturation of the response in natural things leads to thin-tails, even when the "underlying" random variable at the source of the exposure is fat-tailed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access