Researcher profile

Nasrin Sadeghianpourhamami

Nasrin Sadeghianpourhamami contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Computationally efficient joint coordination of multiple electric vehicle charging points using reinforcement learning

A major challenge in todays power grid is to manage the increasing load from electric vehicle (EV) charging. Demand response (DR) solutions aim to exploit flexibility therein, i.e., the ability to shift EV charging in time and thus avoid excessive peaks or achieve better balancing. Whereas the majority of existing research works either focus on control strategies for a single EV charger, or use a multi-step approach (e.g., a first high level aggregate control decision step, followed by individual EV control decisions), we rather propose a single-step solution that jointly coordinates multiple charging points at once. In this paper, we further refine an initial proposal using reinforcement learning (RL), specifically addressing computational challenges that would limit its deployment in practice. More precisely, we design a new Markov decision process (MDP) formulation of the EV charging coordination process, exhibiting only linear space and time complexity (as opposed to the earlier quadratic space complexity). We thus improve upon earlier state-of-the-art, demonstrating 30% reduction of training time in our case study using real-world EV charging session data. Yet, we do not sacrifice the resulting performance in meeting the DR objectives: our new RL solutions still improve the performance of charging demand coordination by 40-50% compared to a business-as-usual policy (that charges EV fully upon arrival) and 20-30% compared to a heuristic policy (that uniformly spreads individual EV charging over time).

preprint2022arXiv

Optimized cost function for demand response coordination of multiple EV charging stations using reinforcement learning

Electric vehicle (EV) charging stations represent a substantial load with significant flexibility. The exploitation of that flexibility in demand response (DR) algorithms becomes increasingly important to manage and balance demand and supply in power grids. Model-free DR based on reinforcement learning (RL) is an attractive approach to balance such EV charging load. We build on previous research on RL, based on a Markov decision process (MDP) to simultaneously coordinate multiple charging stations. However, we note that the computationally expensive cost function adopted in the previous research leads to large training times, which limits the feasibility and practicality of the approach. We, therefore, propose an improved cost function that essentially forces the learned control policy to always fulfill any charging demand that does not offer any flexibility. We rigorously compare the newly proposed batch RL fitted Q-iteration implementation with the original (costly) one, using real-world data. Specifically, for the case of load flattening, we compare the two approaches in terms of (i) the processing time to learn the RL-based charging policy, as well as (ii) the overall performance of the policy decisions in terms of meeting the target load for unseen test data. The performance is analyzed for different training periods and varying training sample sizes. In addition to both RL policies performance results, we provide performance bounds in terms of both (i) an optimal all-knowing strategy, and (ii) a simple heuristic spreading individual EV charging uniformly over time