Source author record

Muralidaran Vijayaraghavan

Muralidaran Vijayaraghavan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Taming Weak Memory Models

Speculative techniques in microarchitectures relax various dependencies in programs, which contributes to the complexity of (weak) memory models. We show using WMM, a new weak memory model, that the model becomes simpler if it includes load-value speculation and thus, does not enforce any dependency! However, in the absence of good value-prediction techniques, a programmer may end up paying a price for the extra fences. Thus, we also present WMM-D, which enforces the dependencies captured by the current microarchitectures. WMM-D is still much simpler than other existing models. We also show that non-atomic multi-copy stores arise as a result of sharing write-through caches. We think restricting microarchitectures to write-back caches (and thus simpler weak memory models) will not incur any performance penalty. Nevertheless, we present WMM-S, another extension to WMM, which could model the effects of non-atomic multi-copy stores. WMM, WMM-D, and WMM-S are all defined using Instantaneous Instruction Execution (I^2E), a new way of describing memory models without explicit reordering or speculative execution.

preprint2015arXiv

A Proof of Correctness for the Tardis Cache Coherence Protocol

We prove the correctness of a recently-proposed cache coherence protocol, Tardis, which is simple, yet scalable to high processor counts, because it only requires O(logN) storage per cacheline for an N-processor system. We prove that Tardis follows the sequential consistency model and is both deadlock- and livelock-free. Our proof is based on simple and intuitive invariants of the system and thus applies to any system scale and many variants of Tardis.