BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Xiangyao Yu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
Yannakakis' seminal algorithm is optimal for acyclic joins, yet it has not been widely adopted due to its poor performance in practice. This paper briefly surveys recent advancements in making Yannakakis' algorithm more practical, in terms of both efficiency and ease of implementation, and points out several avenues for future research.
Network is a major bottleneck in modern cloud databases that adopt a storage-disaggregation architecture. Computation pushdown is a promising solution to tackle this issue, which offloads some computation tasks to the storage layer to reduce network traffic. Existing cloud OLAP systems statically decide whether to push down computation during the query optimization phase and do not consider the storage layer's computational capacity and load. Besides, there is a lack of a general principle that determines which operators are amenable for pushdown. Existing systems design and implement pushdown features empirically, which ends up picking a limited set of pushdown operators respectively. In this paper, we first design Adaptive pushdown as a new mechanism to avoid throttling the storage-layer computation during pushdown, which pushes the request back to the computation layer at runtime if the storage-layer computational resource is insufficient. Moreover, we derive a general principle to identify pushdown-amenable computational tasks, by summarizing common patterns of pushdown capabilities in existing systems. We propose two new pushdown operators, namely, selection bitmap and distributed data shuffle. Evaluation results on TPC-H show that Adaptive pushdown can achieve up to 1.9x speedup over both No pushdown and Eager pushdown baselines, and the new pushdown operators can further accelerate query execution by up to 3.0x.
There has been significant amount of excitement and recent work on GPU-based database systems. Previous work has claimed that these systems can perform orders of magnitude better than CPU-based database systems on analytical workloads such as those found in decision support and business intelligence applications. A hardware expert would view these claims with suspicion. Given the general notion that database operators are memory-bandwidth bound, one would expect the maximum gain to be roughly equal to the ratio of the memory bandwidth of GPU to that of CPU. In this paper, we adopt a model-based approach to understand when and why the performance gains of running queries on GPUs vs on CPUs vary from the bandwidth ratio (which is roughly 16x on modern hardware). We propose Crystal, a library of parallel routines that can be combined together to run full SQL queries on a GPU with minimal materialization overhead. We implement individual query operators to show that while the speedups for selection, projection, and sorts are near the bandwidth ratio, joins achieve less speedup due to differences in hardware capabilities. Interestingly, we show on a popular analytical workload that full query performance gain from running on GPU exceeds the bandwidth ratio despite individual operators having speedup less than bandwidth ratio, as a result of limitations of vectorizing chained operators on CPUs, resulting in a 25x speedup for GPUs over CPUs on the benchmark.
This paper studies the effectiveness of pushing parts of DBMS analytics queries into the Simple Storage Service (S3) engine of Amazon Web Services (AWS), using a recently released capability called S3 Select. We show that some DBMS primitives (filter, projection, aggregation) can always be cost-effectively moved into S3. Other more complex operations (join, top-K, group-by) require reimplementation to take advantage of S3 Select and are often candidates for pushdown. We demonstrate these capabilities through experimentation using a new DBMS that we developed, PushdownDB. Experimentation with a collection of queries including TPC-H queries shows that PushdownDB is on average 30% cheaper and 6.7X faster than a baseline that does not use S3 Select.