Researcher profile

Morwen Thistlethwaite

Morwen Thistlethwaite contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Complex hyperbolic and projective deformations of small Bianchi groups

The Bianchi groups ${\rm Bi}(d)={\rm PSL}(2,\mathcal{O}_d) < {\rm PSL}(2,\C)$ (where $\mathcal{O}_d$ denotes the ring of integers of $\Q (i\sqrt{d})$, with $d \geqslant 1$ squarefree) can be viewed as subgroups of ${\rm SO}(3,1)$ under the isomorphism ${\rm PSL}(2,\C) \simeq {\rm SO}^0(3,1)$. We study the deformations of these groups into the larger Lie groups ${\rm SU}(3,1)$ and ${\rm SL}(4,\R)$ for small values of $d$. In particular we show that ${\rm Bi}(3)$, which is rigid in ${\rm SO}(3,1)$, admits a 1-dimensional deformation space into ${\rm SU}(3,1)$ and ${\rm SL}(4,\R)$, whereas any deformation of ${\rm Bi}(1)$ into ${\rm SU}(3,1)$ or ${\rm SL}(4,\R)$ is conjugate to one inside ${\rm SO}(3,1)$. We also show that none of the deformations into ${\rm SU}(3,1)$ are both discrete and faithful.

preprint2012arXiv

Behavior of knot invariants under genus 2 mutation

Genus 2 mutation is the process of cutting a 3-manifold along an embedded closed genus 2 surface, twisting by the hyper-elliptic involution, and gluing back. This paper compares genus 2 mutation with the better-known Conway mutation in the context of knots in the 3-sphere. Despite the fact that any Conway mutation can be achieved by a sequence of at most two genus 2 mutations, the invariants that are preserved by genus 2 mutation are a proper subset of those preserved by Conway mutation. In particular, while the Alexander and Jones polynomials are preserved by genus 2 mutation, the HOMFLY-PT polynomial is not. In the case of the sl_2-Khovanov homology, which may or may not be invariant under Conway mutation, we give an example where genus 2 mutation changes this homology. Finally, using these techniques, we exhibit examples of knots with the same same colored Jones polynomials, HOMFLY-PT polynomial, Kauffman polynomial, signature and volume, but different Khovanov homology.