BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Antonin Guilloux

Antonin Guilloux appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.GTmath.NTmath.AGmath.DSmath.MG

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Slim curves, limit sets and spherical CR uniformisations

We consider here the $3$-sphere $\mathbf S^3$ seen as the boundary at infinity of the complex hyperbolic plane $\mathbf{H}^2_{\mathbf C}$. It comes equipped with a contact structure and two classes of special curves. First $\mathbf R$-circles are boundaries at infinity of totally real totally geodesic subspaces and are tangent to the contact distribution. Second, $\mathbf C$-circles, which are boundaries of complex totally geodesic subspaces and are transverse to the contact distribution. We define a quantitative notion, called slimness, that measures to what extent a continuous path in the sphere $\mathbf S^3$ is near to be an $\mathbf R$-circle. We analyze the classical foliation of the complement of an $\mathbf R$-circle by arcs of $\mathbf C$-circles. Next, we consider deformations of this situation where the $\mathbf R$-circle becomes a slim curve. We apply these concepts to the particular case where the slim curve is the limit set of a quasi-Fuchsian subgroup of $\mathrm{PU}(2,1)$. As a consequence, we describe a class of spherical CR uniformizations of certain cusped $3$-manifolds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Deformation space of discrete groups of SU(2,1) in quaternionic hyperbolic plane

In this note, we study deformations of discrete and Zariski dense subgroups of SU(2, 1) in quaternionic hyperbolic space. Specifi- cally we consider two examples coming from representations of 3-manifold groups (the figure eight knot and Whitehead links complement) and show opposite behavior: one is not deformable outside U(2,1), while the other has a big space of deformations in Sp(2, 1).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Hilbert metric, beyond convexity

The Hilbert metric on convex subsets of $\mathbb R^n$ has proven a rich notion and has been extensively studied. We propose here a generalization of this metric to subset of complex projective spaces and give examples of applications to diverse fields. Basic examples include the classical Hilbert metric which coincides with the hyperbolic metric on real hyperbolic spaces as well as the complex hyperbolic metric on complex hyperbolic spaces.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Volume function and Mahler measure of exact polynomials

We study a class of 2-variable polynomials called exact polynomials which contains $A$-polynomials of knot complements. The Mahler measure of these polynomials can be computed in terms of a volume function defined on the vanishing set of the polynomial. We prove that the local extrema of the volume function are on the 2-dimensional torus and give a closed formula for the Mahler measure in terms of these extremal values. This formula shows that the Mahler measure of an irreducible and exact polynomial divided by $π$ is greater than the amplitude of the volume function. We also prove a $K$-theoretical criterium for a polynomial to be a factor of an $A$-polynomial and give a topological interpretation of its Mahler measure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Deformation of hyperbolic manifolds in $\mathrm {PGL}(n,\mathbf {C})$ and discreteness of the peripheral representations

Let $ M$ be a cusped hyperbolic $ 3$-manifold, e.g. a knot complement. Thurston showed that the space of deformations of its fundamental group in $ \mathrm {PGL}(2,\mathbf {C})$ (up to conjugation) is of complex dimension the number $ ν$ of cusps near the hyperbolic representation. It seems natural to ask whether some representations remain discrete after deformation. The answer is generically not. A simple reason for it lies inside the cusps: the degeneracy of the peripheral representation (i.e. representations of fundamental groups of the $ ν$ peripheral tori). They indeed generically become non-discrete, except for a countable set. This last set corresponds to hyperbolic Dehn surgeries on $ M$, for which the peripheral representation is no more faithful.We work here in the framework of $ \mathrm {PGL}(n,\mathbf {C})$. The hyperbolic structure lifts, via the $ n$-dimensional irreducible representation, to a representation $ ρ\_{\mathrm {geom}}$. We know from the work of Menal-Ferrer and Porti that the space of deformations of $ ρ\_{\textrm {geom}}$ has complex dimension $ (n-1)ν$.We prove here that, unlike the $ \mathrm {PGL}(2)$-case, the generic behaviour becomes the discreteness (and faithfulness) of the peripheral representation: in a neighbourhood of the geometric representation, the non-discrete peripheral representations are contained in a real analytic subvariety of codimension $ \geq 1$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Volumes of representations and birationality of the peripheral holonomy

We discuss here a generalization of a theorem by Dunfield stating that the peripheral holonomy map, from the character variety of a 3-manifold to the A-polynomial is birational. Dunfield's proof involves the rigidity of maximal volume. The volume is still an important ingredient in this paper. Unfortunately at this point no complete proof is done. Instead, a conjecture is stated about the volume function on the character variety that would imply the generalized birationality result.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Dimension of character varieties for $3$-manifolds

Let $M$ be a $3$-manifold, compact with boundary and $Γ$ its fundamental group. Consider a complex reductive algebraic group G. The character variety $X(Γ,G)$ is the GIT quotient $\mathrm{Hom}(Γ,G)//G$ of the space of morphisms $Γ\to G$ by the natural action by conjugation of $G$. In the case $G=\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb C)$ this space has been thoroughly studied. Following work of Thurston, as presented by Culler-Shalen, we give a lower bound for the dimension of irreducible components of $X(Γ,G)$ in terms of the Euler characteristic $χ(M)$ of $M$, the number $t$ of torus boundary components of $M$, the dimension $d$ and the rank $r$ of $G$. Indeed, under mild assumptions on an irreducible component $X_0$ of $X(Γ,G)$, we prove the inequality $$\mathrm{dim}(X_0)\geq t \cdot r - dχ(M).$$

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Representations of 3-manifold groups in PGL(n,C) and their restriction to the boundary

We study here the space of representations of a fundamental group of a 3-manifold into PGL(n,C). Thurston, Neumann and Zagier initiated a strategy (in the case of PGL(2,C)) consisting in: triangulate the manifold, assign shapes to each pieces and then try to glue back. This leads to the "gluing equations" and the Neumann-Zagier symplectic space. Building on the works of Dimofte-Gabella-Goncharov and Bergeron-Falbel-Guilloux, we complete the picture in the case of PGL(n,C). We recover a situation very similar to the case of PGL(2,C). This allows for example to obtain a combinatorial proof of a local rigidity results for such representations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access