BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Moritz Grosse-Wentrup

Moritz Grosse-Wentrup appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Machine LearningNeurons and CognitionMethodologyApplicationsHuman-Computer InteractionArtificial Intelligenceeess.SPmath.STQuantitative MethodsStatistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

13works
10topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

2021 BEETL Competition: Advancing Transfer Learning for Subject Independence & Heterogenous EEG Data Sets

Transfer learning and meta-learning offer some of the most promising avenues to unlock the scalability of healthcare and consumer technologies driven by biosignal data. This is because current methods cannot generalise well across human subjects' data and handle learning from different heterogeneously collected data sets, thus limiting the scale of training data. On the other side, developments in transfer learning would benefit significantly from a real-world benchmark with immediate practical application. Therefore, we pick electroencephalography (EEG) as an exemplar for what makes biosignal machine learning hard. We design two transfer learning challenges around diagnostics and Brain-Computer-Interfacing (BCI), that have to be solved in the face of low signal-to-noise ratios, major variability among subjects, differences in the data recording sessions and techniques, and even between the specific BCI tasks recorded in the dataset. Task 1 is centred on the field of medical diagnostics, addressing automatic sleep stage annotation across subjects. Task 2 is centred on Brain-Computer Interfacing (BCI), addressing motor imagery decoding across both subjects and data sets. The BEETL competition with its over 30 competing teams and its 3 winning entries brought attention to the potential of deep transfer learning and combinations of set theory and conventional machine learning techniques to overcome the challenges. The results set a new state-of-the-art for the real-world BEETL benchmark.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Distance Covariance-based Kernel for Nonlinear Causal Clustering in Heterogeneous Populations

We consider the problem of causal structure learning in the setting of heterogeneous populations, i.e., populations in which a single causal structure does not adequately represent all population members, as is common in biological and social sciences. To this end, we introduce a distance covariance-based kernel designed specifically to measure the similarity between the underlying nonlinear causal structures of different samples. Indeed, we prove that the corresponding feature map is a statistically consistent estimator of nonlinear independence structure, rendering the kernel itself a statistical test for the hypothesis that sets of samples come from different generating causal structures. Even stronger, we prove that the kernel space is isometric to the space of causal ancestral graphs, so that distance between samples in the kernel space is guaranteed to correspond to distance between their generating causal structures. This kernel thus enables us to perform clustering to identify the homogeneous subpopulations, for which we can then learn causal structures using existing methods. Though we focus on the theoretical aspects of the kernel, we also evaluate its performance on synthetic data and demonstrate its use on a real gene expression data set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Measurement Dependence Inducing Latent Causal Models

We consider the task of causal structure learning over measurement dependence inducing latent (MeDIL) causal models. We show that this task can be framed in terms of the graph theoretic problem of finding edge clique covers,resulting in an algorithm for returning minimal MeDIL causal models (minMCMs). This algorithm is non-parametric, requiring no assumptions about linearity or Gaussianity. Furthermore, despite rather weak assumptions aboutthe class of MeDIL causal models, we show that minimality in minMCMs implies some rather specific and interesting properties. By establishing MeDIL causal models as a semantics for edge clique covers, we also provide a starting point for future work further connecting causal structure learning to developments in graph theory and network science.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

MYND: Unsupervised Evaluation of Novel BCI Control Strategies on Consumer Hardware

Neurophysiological studies are typically conducted in laboratories with limited ecological validity, scalability, and generalizability of findings. This is a significant challenge for the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which ultimately need to function in unsupervised settings on consumer-grade hardware. We introduce MYND: A framework that couples consumer-grade recording hardware with an easy-to-use application for the unsupervised evaluation of BCI control strategies. Subjects are guided through experiment selection, hardware fitting, recording, and data upload in order to self-administer multi-day studies that include neurophysiological recordings and questionnaires. As a use case, we evaluate two BCI control strategies ("Positive memories" and "Music imagery") in a realistic scenario by combining MYND with a four-channel electroencephalogram (EEG). Thirty subjects recorded 70.4 hours of EEG data with the system at home. The median headset fitting time was 25.9 seconds, and a median signal quality of 90.2% was retained during recordings.Neural activity in both control strategies could be decoded with an average offline accuracy of 68.5% and 64.0% across all days. The repeated unsupervised execution of the same strategy affected performance, which could be tackled by implementing feedback to let subjects switch between strategies or devise new strategies with the platform.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

Causal Consistency of Structural Equation Models

Complex systems can be modelled at various levels of detail. Ideally, causal models of the same system should be consistent with one another in the sense that they agree in their predictions of the effects of interventions. We formalise this notion of consistency in the case of Structural Equation Models (SEMs) by introducing exact transformations between SEMs. This provides a general language to consider, for instance, the different levels of description in the following three scenarios: (a) models with large numbers of variables versus models in which the `irrelevant' or unobservable variables have been marginalised out; (b) micro-level models versus macro-level models in which the macro-variables are aggregate features of the micro-variables; (c) dynamical time series models versus models of their stationary behaviour. Our analysis stresses the importance of well specified interventions in the causal modelling process and sheds light on the interpretation of cyclic SEMs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

MERLiN: Mixture Effect Recovery in Linear Networks

Causal inference concerns the identification of cause-effect relationships between variables, e.g. establishing whether a stimulus affects activity in a certain brain region. The observed variables themselves often do not constitute meaningful causal variables, however, and linear combinations need to be considered. In electroencephalographic studies, for example, one is not interested in establishing cause-effect relationships between electrode signals (the observed variables), but rather between cortical signals (the causal variables) which can be recovered as linear combinations of electrode signals. We introduce MERLiN (Mixture Effect Recovery in Linear Networks), a family of causal inference algorithms that implement a novel means of constructing causal variables from non-causal variables. We demonstrate through application to EEG data how the basic MERLiN algorithm can be extended for application to different (neuroimaging) data modalities. Given an observed linear mixture, the algorithms can recover a causal variable that is a linear effect of another given variable. That is, MERLiN allows us to recover a cortical signal that is affected by activity in a certain brain region, while not being a direct effect of the stimulus. The Python/Matlab implementation for all presented algorithms is available on https://github.com/sweichwald/MERLiN

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Recovery of non-linear cause-effect relationships from linearly mixed neuroimaging data

Causal inference concerns the identification of cause-effect relationships between variables. However, often only linear combinations of variables constitute meaningful causal variables. For example, recovering the signal of a cortical source from electroencephalography requires a well-tuned combination of signals recorded at multiple electrodes. We recently introduced the MERLiN (Mixture Effect Recovery in Linear Networks) algorithm that is able to recover, from an observed linear mixture, a causal variable that is a linear effect of another given variable. Here we relax the assumption of this cause-effect relationship being linear and present an extended algorithm that can pick up non-linear cause-effect relationships. Thus, the main contribution is an algorithm (and ready to use code) that has broader applicability and allows for a richer model class. Furthermore, a comparative analysis indicates that the assumption of linear cause-effect relationships is not restrictive in analysing electroencephalographic data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Causal and anti-causal learning in pattern recognition for neuroimaging

Pattern recognition in neuroimaging distinguishes between two types of models: encoding- and decoding models. This distinction is based on the insight that brain state features, that are found to be relevant in an experimental paradigm, carry a different meaning in encoding- than in decoding models. In this paper, we argue that this distinction is not sufficient: Relevant features in encoding- and decoding models carry a different meaning depending on whether they represent causal- or anti-causal relations. We provide a theoretical justification for this argument and conclude that causal inference is essential for interpretation in neuroimaging.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Causal interpretation rules for encoding and decoding models in neuroimaging

Causal terminology is often introduced in the interpretation of encoding and decoding models trained on neuroimaging data. In this article, we investigate which causal statements are warranted and which ones are not supported by empirical evidence. We argue that the distinction between encoding and decoding models is not sufficient for this purpose: relevant features in encoding and decoding models carry a different meaning in stimulus- and in response-based experimental paradigms. We show that only encoding models in the stimulus-based setting support unambiguous causal interpretations. By combining encoding and decoding models trained on the same data, however, we obtain insights into causal relations beyond those that are implied by each individual model type. We illustrate the empirical relevance of our theoretical findings on EEG data recorded during a visuo-motor learning task.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Decoding index finger position from EEG using random forests

While invasively recorded brain activity is known to provide detailed information on motor commands, it is an open question at what level of detail information about positions of body parts can be decoded from non-invasively acquired signals. In this work it is shown that index finger positions can be differentiated from non-invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings in healthy human subjects. Using a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation procedure, a random forest distinguished different index finger positions on a numerical keyboard above chance-level accuracy. Among the different spectral features investigated, high $β$-power (20-30 Hz) over contralateral sensorimotor cortex carried most information about finger position. Thus, these findings indicate that finger position is in principle decodable from non-invasive features of brain activity that generalize across individuals.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Transfer Learning in Brain-Computer Interfaces

The performance of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) improves with the amount of available training data, the statistical distribution of this data, however, varies across subjects as well as across sessions within individual subjects, limiting the transferability of training data or trained models between them. In this article, we review current transfer learning techniques in BCIs that exploit shared structure between training data of multiple subjects and/or sessions to increase performance. We then present a framework for transfer learning in the context of BCIs that can be applied to any arbitrary feature space, as well as a novel regression estimation method that is specifically designed for the structure of a system based on the electroencephalogram (EEG). We demonstrate the utility of our framework and method on subject-to-subject transfer in a motor-imagery paradigm as well as on session-to-session transfer in one patient diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), showing that it is able to outperform other comparable methods on an identical dataset.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Quantifying causal influences

Many methods for causal inference generate directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) that formalize causal relations between $n$ variables. Given the joint distribution on all these variables, the DAG contains all information about how intervening on one variable changes the distribution of the other $n-1$ variables. However, quantifying the causal influence of one variable on another one remains a nontrivial question. Here we propose a set of natural, intuitive postulates that a measure of causal strength should satisfy. We then introduce a communication scenario, where edges in a DAG play the role of channels that can be locally corrupted by interventions. Causal strength is then the relative entropy distance between the old and the new distribution. Many other measures of causal strength have been proposed, including average causal effect, transfer entropy, directed information, and information flow. We explain how they fail to satisfy the postulates on simple DAGs of $\leq3$ nodes. Finally, we investigate the behavior of our measure on time-series, supporting our claims with experiments on simulated data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The Influence of Decoding Accuracy on Perceived Control: A Simulated BCI Study

Understanding the relationship between the decoding accuracy of a brain-computer interface (BCI) and a subject's subjective feeling of control is important for determining a lower limit on decoding accuracy for a BCI that is to be deployed outside a laboratory environment. We investigated this relationship by systematically varying the level of control in a simulated BCI task. We find that a binary decoding accuracy of 65% is required for users to report more often than not that they are feeling in control of the system. Decoding accuracies above 75%, on the other hand, added little in terms of the level of perceived control. We further find that the probability of perceived control does not only depend on the actual decoding accuracy, but is also in influenced by whether subjects successfully complete the given task in the allotted time frame.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access