BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mohammad Ghaljehei

Mohammad Ghaljehei contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.SYSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A SOCP-based ACOPF for Operational Scheduling of Three-phase Unbalanced Distribution Systems and Coordination of PV Smart Inverters

The proliferation of distributed energy resources (DERs) im-poses new challenges to distribution system operation, e.g., power quality issues. To overcome these challenges and enhance system operation, it is critical to effectively utilize all available resources and accurately characterize unbalanced distribution networks in operational tools. This paper proposes a convex second-order-cone programming (SOCP)-based AC optimal power flow (ACOPF) model for three-phase unbalanced distribution net-works, including smart inverters and Volt-VAr controller (VVC) devices. Reactive power-voltage (Q-V) characteristics of smart inverters of solar photovoltaic (PV) units are also modeled. More-over, the settings of Q-V characteristics of VVC are co-optimized within the proposed ACOPF, considering the allowable range of the IEEE 1547-2018 standard. Furthermore, dynamic analyses are conducted to verify the stability of optimal settings of VVC. The proposed models are tested on an actual 1747-node primary distribution feeder in Arizona. The results illustrate the effective-ness of the proposed ACOPF for unbalanced systems in provid-ing a global optimal solution while capturing the non-linearity and non-convexity of ACOPF. By co-optimizing settings, system operation is improved due to the flexibility of adjusting reactive power output from PV units with VVC. The time-domain simu-lations show that the optimal settings result in a stable system

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Stochastic AC Network-constrained Scheduling of CAES and Wind Power Generation in Joint Energy and reserve market: Toward More Realistic Results

In this paper, a two-stage stochastic day-ahead (DA) scheduling model is proposed incorporating wind power units and compressed air energy storage (CAES) to clear a co-optimized energy and reserve market. The two-stage stochastic programming method is employed to deal with the wind power generation uncertain nature. A linearized AC optimal power flow (LAC-OPF) approach with consideration of network losses, reactive power, and voltage magnitude constraints is utilized in the proposed two-stage stochastic DA scheduling model. Using an engineering insight, a two-level LAC-OPF (TL-LAC-OPF) approach is proposed to (i) reduce the number of binary variables of the LAC-OPF approach which decreases the computational burden, and (ii) obtain LAC-OPF pre-defined parameters adaptively so that the accuracy of LAC-OPF approach is increased as a result of reducing artificial losses. Furthermore, as the CAES efficiency depends on its thermodynamic and operational conditions, the proposed two-stage stochastic DA scheduling model is developed by considering its thermodynamic characteristics to obtain a more realistic market decision at the first place. The proposed model is applied to IEEE 30-bus and 57-bus test systems using GAMS software, and is compared with three traditional approaches, i.e., AC-OPF, DC-OPF, and LAC-OPF. Simulation results demonstrate effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Representation of Uncertainty in Electric Energy Market Models: Pricing Implication and Formulation

Modern market management systems continue to evolve due to the intentions to improve system security and reliability. This evolvement has been leading to a transition of market auction models from a deterministic structure with approximations on the reliability criteria (e.g., acquirement of contingency reserve through proxy reserve policies) to explicit representation of contingencies (e.g., estimation of post-contingency states via participation factors and stochastic programming). This paper proposes a comprehensive framework to establish various procedures for evaluating: (i) transparency and incentive compatibility of different contingency modeling approaches, and (ii) efficiency of two possible stochastic market designs. First, the concept of securitized LMP is presented to solve the issue of how market participants should be compensated for providing N-1 reliability services. Then, pricing implications and settlements of three market models are compared: (i) a deterministic market model with proxy serve policies, (ii) state-of-the-art market models with estimated post-contingency states, and (iii) a two-stage stochastic market model. Second, this paper evaluates two stochastic market models while accounting for potential adjustments from day-ahead scheduling to real-time operation: (i) minimizing expected operating cost of all N-1 scenarios, and (ii) minimizing the base-case (or no contingency) cost. These analyses are conducted on IEEE 118-bus test system.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access