Source author record

Ming Ling

Ming Ling appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Timing Yield Model for SRAM Cells in Sub/Near-threshold Voltages Based on A Compact Drain Current Model

Sub/Near-threshold static random-access memory (SRAM) design is crucial for addressing the memory bottleneck in energy-constrained applications. However, the high integration density and reliability under process variations demand an accurate estimation of extremely small failure probabilities. To capture such a rare event in memory circuits, the time and storage overhead of conventional Monte Carlo (MC) simulations cannot be tolerated. On the other hand, classic analytical methods predicting failure probabilities from a physical expression become inaccurate in the sub/near-threshold region due to the assumed distribution or the oversimplified drain current model for nanoscale devices. This work first proposes a simple but efficient drain current model to describe the drain-induced barrier lowering effect at low voltages. Based on that, the probability density functions of the interest metrics in SRAM are derived. Two analytical models are then put forward to evaluate SRAM dynamic stabilities including access and write-time failures. The proposed models can be extended easily to different types of SRAM with different read/write assist circuits. The models are validated against MC simulations across different operating voltages and temperatures. The average relative errors at 0.5V VDD are only 8.8% and 10.4% for the access-time and write failure models respectively. The size of required data samples is 43.6X smaller than that of the state-of-the-art method.