Researcher profile

Miklos Santha

Miklos Santha contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Classical and Quantum Algorithms for Variants of Subset-Sum via Dynamic Programming

Subset-Sum is an NP-complete problem where one must decide if a multiset of $n$ integers contains a subset whose elements sum to a target value $m$. The best-known classical and quantum algorithms run in time $\tilde{O}(2^{n/2})$ and $\tilde{O}(2^{n/3})$, respectively, based on the well-known meet-in-the-middle technique. Here we introduce a novel classical dynamic-programming-based data structure with applications to Subset-Sum and a number of variants, including Equal-Sums (where one seeks two disjoint subsets with the same sum), 2-Subset-Sum (a relaxed version of Subset-Sum where each item in the input set can be used twice in the summation), and Shifted-Sums, a generalization of both of these variants, where one seeks two disjoint subsets whose sums differ by some specified value. Given any modulus $p$, our data structure can be constructed in time $O(n^2p)$, after which queries can be made in time $O(n^2)$ to the lists of subsets summing to any value modulo $p$. We use this data structure in combination with variable-time amplitude amplification and a new quantum pair finding algorithm, extending the quantum claw finding algorithm to the multiple solutions case, to give an $O(2^{0.504n})$ quantum algorithm for Shifted-Sums, an improvement on the best-known $O(2^{0.773n})$ classical running time. Incidentally, we obtain new $\tilde{O}(2^{n/2})$ and $\tilde{O}(2^{n/3})$ classical and quantum algorithms for Subset-Sum, not based on the seminal meet-in-the-middle method. We also study Pigeonhole Equal-Sums and Pigeonhole Modular Equal-Sums, where the existence of a solution is guaranteed by the pigeonhole principle. For the former problem, we give faster classical and quantum algorithms with running time $\tilde{O}(2^{n/2})$ and $\tilde{O}(2^{2n/5})$, respectively. For the more general modular problem, we give a classical algorithm that also runs in time $\tilde{O}(2^{n/2})$.

preprint2020arXiv

Quantum algorithms for graph problems with cut queries

Let $G$ be an $n$-vertex graph with $m$ edges. When asked a subset $S$ of vertices, a cut query on $G$ returns the number of edges of $G$ that have exactly one endpoint in $S$. We show that there is a bounded-error quantum algorithm that determines all connected components of $G$ after making $O(\log(n)^6)$ many cut queries. In contrast, it follows from results in communication complexity that any randomized algorithm even just to decide whether the graph is connected or not must make at least $Ω(n/\log(n))$ many cut queries. We further show that with $O(\log(n)^8)$ many cut queries a quantum algorithm can with high probability output a spanning forest for $G$. En route to proving these results, we design quantum algorithms for learning a graph using cut queries. We show that a quantum algorithm can learn a graph with maximum degree $d$ after $O(d \log(n)^2)$ many cut queries, and can learn a general graph with $O(\sqrt{m} \log(n)^{3/2})$ many cut queries. These two upper bounds are tight up to the poly-logarithmic factors, and compare to $Ω(dn)$ and $Ω(m/\log(n))$ lower bounds on the number of cut queries needed by a randomized algorithm for the same problems, respectively. The key ingredients in our results are the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm, approximate counting with "OR queries", and learning sparse vectors from inner products as in compressed sensing.

preprint2020arXiv

Quantum algorithms for hedging and the learning of Ising models

A paradigmatic algorithm for online learning is the Hedge algorithm by Freund and Schapire. An allocation into different strategies is chosen for multiple rounds and each round incurs corresponding losses for each strategy. The algorithm obtains a favorable guarantee for the total losses even in an adversarial situation. This work presents quantum algorithms for such online learning in an oracular setting. For $T$ time steps and $N$ strategies, we exhibit run times of about $O \left ({\rm poly} (T) \sqrt{N} \right)$ for estimating the losses and for betting on individual strategies by sampling. In addition, we discuss a quantum analogue of the Sparsitron, a machine learning algorithm based on the Hedge algorithm. The quantum algorithm inherits the provable learning guarantees from the classical algorithm and exhibits polynomial speedups. The speedups may find relevance in finance, for example for hedging risks, and machine learning, for example for learning generalized linear models or Ising models.

preprint2020arXiv

Quantum and Classical Algorithms for Approximate Submodular Function Minimization

Submodular functions are set functions mapping every subset of some ground set of size $n$ into the real numbers and satisfying the diminishing returns property. Submodular minimization is an important field in discrete optimization theory due to its relevance for various branches of mathematics, computer science and economics. The currently fastest strongly polynomial algorithm for exact minimization [LSW15] runs in time $\widetilde{O}(n^3 \cdot \mathrm{EO} + n^4)$ where $\mathrm{EO}$ denotes the cost to evaluate the function on any set. For functions with range $[-1,1]$, the best $ε$-additive approximation algorithm [CLSW17] runs in time $\widetilde{O}(n^{5/3}/ε^{2} \cdot \mathrm{EO})$. In this paper we present a classical and a quantum algorithm for approximate submodular minimization. Our classical result improves on the algorithm of [CLSW17] and runs in time $\widetilde{O}(n^{3/2}/ε^2 \cdot \mathrm{EO})$. Our quantum algorithm is, up to our knowledge, the first attempt to use quantum computing for submodular optimization. The algorithm runs in time $\widetilde{O}(n^{5/4}/ε^{5/2} \cdot \log(1/ε) \cdot \mathrm{EO})$. The main ingredient of the quantum result is a new method for sampling with high probability $T$ independent elements from any discrete probability distribution of support size $n$ in time $O(\sqrt{Tn})$. Previous quantum algorithms for this problem were of complexity $O(T\sqrt{n})$.

preprint2020arXiv

Total Functions in QMA

The complexity class QMA is the quantum analog of the classical complexity class NP. The functional analogs of NP and QMA, called functional NP (FNP) and functional QMA (FQMA), consist in either outputting a (classical or quantum) witness, or outputting NO if there does not exist a witness.The classical complexity class Total Functional NP (TFNP) is the subset of FNP for which it can be shown that the NO outcome never occurs. TFNP includes many natural and important problems. In the present work we introduce the complexity class of Total Functional QMA (TFQMA), the quantum analog of TFNP. We show that FQMA and TFQMA can be defined in such a way that they do not depend on the values of the completeness and soundness probabilities. In so doing we introduce new notions such as the eigenbasis and spectrum of a quantum verification procedure which are of interest by themselves. We then provide examples of problems that lie in TFQMA, coming from areas such as the complexity of k-local Hamiltonians and public key quantum money. In the context of black-box groups, we note that Group Non-Membership, which was known to belong to QMA, in fact belongs to TFQMA. We also provide a simple oracle with respect to which we have a separation between FBQP and TFQMA. In the conclusion we discuss the relation between TFQMA, public key quantum money, and the complexity of quantum states.

preprint2018arXiv

On the randomised query complexity of composition

Let $f\subseteq\{0,1\}^n\timesΞ$ be a relation and $g:\{0,1\}^m\to\{0,1,*\}$ be a promise function. This work investigates the randomised query complexity of the relation $f\circ g^n\subseteq\{0,1\}^{m\cdot n}\timesΞ$, which can be viewed as one of the most general cases of composition in the query model (letting $g$ be a relation seems to result in a rather unnatural definition of $f\circ g^n$). We show that for every such $f$ and $g$, $$\mathcal R(f\circ g^n) \in Ω(\mathcal R(f)\cdot\sqrt{\mathcal R(g)}),$$ where $\mathcal R$ denotes the randomised query complexity. On the other hand, we demonstrate a relation $f_0$ and a promise function $g_0$, such that $\mathcal R(f_0)\inΘ(\sqrt n)$, $\mathcal R(g_0)\inΘ(n)$ and $\mathcal R(f_0\circ g_0^n)\inΘ(n)$ $-$ that is, our composition statement is tight. To the best of our knowledge, there was no known composition theorem for the randomised query complexity of relations or promise functions (and for the special case of total functions our lower bound gives multiplicative improvement of $\sqrt{\log n}$).

preprint2017arXiv

Quantum attacks on Bitcoin, and how to protect against them

The key cryptographic protocols used to secure the internet and financial transactions of today are all susceptible to attack by the development of a sufficiently large quantum computer. One particular area at risk are cryptocurrencies, a market currently worth over 150 billion USD. We investigate the risk of Bitcoin, and other cryptocurrencies, to attacks by quantum computers. We find that the proof-of-work used by Bitcoin is relatively resistant to substantial speedup by quantum computers in the next 10 years, mainly because specialized ASIC miners are extremely fast compared to the estimated clock speed of near-term quantum computers. On the other hand, the elliptic curve signature scheme used by Bitcoin is much more at risk, and could be completely broken by a quantum computer as early as 2027, by the most optimistic estimates. We analyze an alternative proof-of-work called Momentum, based on finding collisions in a hash function, that is even more resistant to speedup by a quantum computer. We also review the available post-quantum signature schemes to see which one would best meet the security and efficiency requirements of blockchain applications.

preprint2013arXiv

Polynomial time quantum algorithms for certain bivariate hidden polynomial problems

We present a new method for solving the hidden polynomial graph problem (HPGP) which is a special case of the hidden polynomial problem (HPP). The new approach yields an efficient quantum algorithm for the bivariate HPGP even when the input consists of several level set superpositions, a more difficult version of the problem than the one where the input is given by an oracle. For constant degree, the algorithm is polylogarithmic in the size of the base field. We also apply the results to give an efficient quantum algorithm for the oracle version of the HPP for an interesting family of bivariate hidden functions. This family includes diagonal quadratic forms and elliptic curves.