BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Michel Raynal

Michel Raynal appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingData Structures and AlgorithmsDatabasesInformation Theorymath.ITNetworking and Internet Architecture

Catalog footprint

What is connected

19works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

19 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Context Adaptive Cooperation

As shown by Reliable Broadcast and Consensus, cooperation among a set of independent computing entities (sequential processes) is a central issue in distributed computing. Considering $n$-process asynchronous message-passing systems where some processes can be Byzantine, this paper introduces a new cooperation abstraction denoted Context-Adaptive Cooperation (CAC). While Reliable Broadcast is a one-to-$n$ cooperation abstraction and Consensus is an $n$-to-$n$ cooperation abstraction, CAC is a $d$-to-$n$ cooperation abstraction where the parameter $d$ ($1\leq d\leq n$) depends on the run and remains unknown to the processes. Moreover, the correct processes accept the same set of $\ell$ pairs $\langle v,i\rangle$ ($v$ is the value proposed by $p_i$) from the $d$ proposer processes, where $1 \leq \ell \leq d$ and, as $d$, $\ell$ remains unknown to the processes (except in specific cases). Those $\ell$ values are accepted one at a time in different orders at each process. Furthermore, CAC provides the processes with an imperfect oracle that gives information about the values that they may accept in the future. In a very interesting way, the CAC abstraction is particularly efficient in favorable circumstances. To illustrate its practical use, the paper describes in detail two applications that benefit from the abstraction: a fast consensus implementation under low contention (named Cascading Consensus), and a novel naming problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Asynchronous Byzantine Reliable Broadcast With a Message Adversary

This paper considers the problem of reliable broadcast in asynchronous authenticated systems, in which n processes communicate using signed messages and up to t processes may behave arbitrarily (Byzantine processes). In addition, for each message m broadcast by a correct (i.e., non-Byzantine) process, a message adversary may prevent up to d correct processes from receiving m. (This message adversary captures network failures such as transient disconnections, silent churn, or message losses.) Considering such a "double" adversarial context and assuming n > 3t + 2d, a reliable broadcast algorithm is presented. Interestingly, when there is no message adversary (i.e., d = 0), the algorithm terminates in two communication steps (so, in this case, this algorithm is optimal in terms of both Byzantine tolerance and time efficiency). It is then shown that the condition n > 3t + 2d is necessary for implementing reliable broadcast in the presence of both Byzantine processes and a message adversary (whether the underlying system is enriched with signatures or not).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Election in Fully Anonymous Shared Memory Systems: Tight Space Bounds and Algorithms

This article addresses election in fully anonymous systems made up of $n$ asynchronous processes that communicate through atomic read-write registers or atomic read-modify-write registers. Given an integer $d\in\{1,\dots, n-1\}$, two elections problems are considered: $d$-election (at least one and at most $d$ processes are elected) and exact $d$-election (exactly $d$ processes are elected). Full anonymity means that both the processes and the shared registers are anonymous. Memory anonymity means that the processes may disagree on the names of the shared registers. That is, the same register name $A$ can denote different registers for different processes, and the register name $A$ used by a process and the register name $B$ used by another process can address the same shared register.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Self-stabilizing Byzantine- and Intrusion-tolerant Consensus

One of the most celebrated problems of fault-tolerant distributed computing is the consensus problem. It was shown to abstract a myriad of problems in which processes have to agree on a single value. Consensus applications include fundamental services for the environments of the Cloud or Blockchain. In such challenging environments, malicious behavior is often modeled as adversarial Byzantine faults. At OPODIS 2010, Moste}faoui and Raynal, in short, MR, presented a Byzantine- and intrusion-tolerant solution to consensus in which the decided value cannot be a value proposed only by Byzantine processes. In addition to this validity property, MR has optimal resilience since it can deal with up to t < n/3 Byzantine processes, where n is the number of processes. We note that MR provides this multivalued consensus object (which accepts proposals taken from a set with a finite number of values) assuming the availability of a single Binary consensus object (which accepts proposals taken from the set {0,1}). This work, which focuses on multivalued consensus, aims at the design of an even more robust solution than MR. Our proposal expands MR's fault-model with self-stabilization, a vigorous notion of fault-tolerance. In addition to tolerating Byzantine and communication failures, self-stabilizing systems can automatically recover after the occurrence of arbitrary transient-faults. These faults represent any violation of the assumptions according to which the system was designed to operate (provided that the algorithm code remains intact). To the best of our knowledge, we propose the first self-stabilizing solution for intrusion-tolerant multivalued consensus for asynchronous message-passing systems prone to Byzantine failures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Money Transfer Made Simple: a Specification, a Generic Algorithm, and its Proof

It has recently been shown that, contrarily to a common belief, money transfer in the presence of faulty (Byzantine) processes does not require strong agreement such as consensus. This article goes one step further: namely, it first proposes a non-sequential specification of the money-transfer object, and then presents a generic algorithm based on a simple FIFO order between each pair of processes that implements it. The genericity dimension lies in the underlying reliable broadcast abstraction which must be suited to the appropriate failure model. Interestingly, whatever the failure model, the money transfer algorithm only requires adding a single sequence number to its messages as control information. Moreover, as a side effect of the proposed algorithm, it follows that money transfer is a weaker problem than the construction of a safe/regular/atomic read/write register in the asynchronous message-passing crash-prone model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Appending Atomically in Byzantine Distributed Ledgers

A Distributed Ledger Object (DLO) is a concurrent object that maintains a totally ordered sequence of records, and supports two basic operations: append, which appends a record at the end of the sequence, and get, which returns the sequence of records. In this work we provide a proper formalization of a Byzantine-tolerant Distributed Ledger Object (BDLO), which is a DLO in a distributed system in which processes may deviate arbitrarily from their indented behavior, i.e. they may be Byzantine. Our formal definition is accompanied by algorithms to implement BDLOs by utilizing an underlying Byzantine Atomic Broadcast service. We then utilize the BDLO implementations to solve the Atomic Appends problem against Byzantine processes. The Atomic Appends problem emerges when several clients have records to append, the record of each client has to be appended to a different BDLO, and it must be guaranteed that either all records are appended or none. We present distributed algorithms implementing solutions for the Atomic Appends problem when the clients (which are involved in the appends) and the servers (which maintain the BDLOs) may be Byzantine.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Self-stabilizing Uniform Reliable Broadcast

We study a well-known communication abstraction called Uniform Reliable Broadcast (URB). URB is central in the design and implementation of fault-tolerant distributed systems, as many non-trivial fault-tolerant distributed applications require communication with provable guarantees on message deliveries. Our study focuses on fault-tolerant implementations for time-free message-passing systems that are prone to node-failures. Moreover, we aim at the design of an even more robust communication abstraction. We do so through the lenses of self-stabilization---a very strong notion of fault-tolerance. In addition to node and communication failures, self-stabilizing algorithms can recover after the occurrence of arbitrary transient faults; these faults represent any violation of the assumptions according to which the system was designed to operate (as long as the algorithm code stays intact). This work proposes the first self-stabilizing URB solution for time-free message-passing systems that are prone to node-failures. The proposed algorithm has an O(bufferUnitSize) stabilization time (in terms of asynchronous cycles) from arbitrary transient faults, where bufferUnitSize is a predefined constant that can be set according to the available memory. Moreover, the communication costs of our algorithm are similar to the ones of the non-self-stabilizing state-of-the-art. The main differences are that our proposal considers repeated gossiping of O(1) bits messages and deals with bounded space (which is a prerequisite for self-stabilization). Specifically, each node needs to store up to bufferUnitSize n records and each record is of size O(v + n log n) bits, where n is the number of nodes in the system and v is the number of bits needed to encode a single URB instance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

From Byzantine Failures to Crash Failures in Message-Passing Systems: a BG Simulation-based approach

The BG-simulation is a powerful reduction algorithm designed for asynchronous read/write crash-prone systems. It allows a set of $(t+1)$ asynchronous sequential processes to wait-free simulate (i.e., despite the crash of up to $t$ of them) an arbitrary number $n$ of processes under the assumption that at most $t$ of them may crash. The BG simulation shows that, in read/write systems, the crucial parameter is not the number $n$ of processes, but the upper bound $t$ on the number of process crashes. The paper extends the concept of BG simulation to asynchronous message-passing systems prone to Byzantine failures. Byzantine failures are the most general type of failure: a faulty process can exhibit any arbitrary behavior. Because of this, they are also the most difficult to analyze and to handle algorithmically. The main contribution of the paper is a signature-free reduction of Byzantine failures to crash failures. Assuming $t<\min(n',n/3)$, the paper presents an algorithm that simulates a system of $n'$ processes where up to $t$ may crash, on top of a basic system of $n$ processes where up to $t$ may be Byzantine. While topological techniques have been used to relate the computability of Byzantine failure-prone systems to that of crash failure-prone ones, this simulation is the first, to our knowledge, that establishes this relation directly, in an algorithmic way. In addition to extending the basic BG simulation to message-passing systems and failures more severe than process crashes, being modular and direct, this simulation provides us with a deeper insight in the nature and understanding of crash and Byzantine failures in the context of asynchronous message-passing systems. Moreover, it also allows crash-tolerant algorithms, designed for asynchronous read/write systems, to be executed on top of asynchronous message-passing systems prone to Byzantine failures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Optimal Collision/Conflict-free Distance-2 Coloring in Synchronous Broadcast/Receive Tree Networks

This article is on message-passing systems where communication is (a) synchronous and (b) based on the "broadcast/receive" pair of communication operations. "Synchronous" means that time is discrete and appears as a sequence of time slots (or rounds) such that each message is received in the very same round in which it is sent. "Broadcast/receive" means that during a round a process can either broadcast a message to its neighbors or receive a message from one of them. In such a communication model, no two neighbors of the same process, nor a process and any of its neighbors, must be allowed to broadcast during the same time slot (thereby preventing message collisions in the first case, and message conflicts in the second case). From a graph theory point of view, the allocation of slots to processes is know as the distance-2 coloring problem: a color must be associated with each process (defining the time slots in which it will be allowed to broadcast) in such a way that any two processes at distance at most 2 obtain different colors, while the total number of colors is "as small as possible". The paper presents a parallel message-passing distance-2 coloring algorithm suited to trees, whose roots are dynamically defined. This algorithm, which is itself collision-free and conflict-free, uses $Δ+ 1$ colors where $Δ$ is the maximal degree of the graph (hence the algorithm is color-optimal). It does not require all processes to have different initial identities, and its time complexity is $O(d Δ)$, where d is the depth of the tree. As far as we know, this is the first distributed distance-2 coloring algorithm designed for the broadcast/receive round-based communication model, which owns all the previous properties.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Time-Efficient Read/Write Register in Crash-prone Asynchronous Message-Passing Systems

The atomic register is certainly the most basic object of computing science. Its implementation on top of an n-process asynchronous message-passing system has received a lot of attention. It has been shown that t \textless{} n/2 (where t is the maximal number of processes that may crash) is a necessary and sufficient requirement to build an atomic register on top of a crash-prone asynchronous message-passing system. Considering such a context, this paper visits the notion of a fast implementation of an atomic register, and presents a new time-efficient asynchronous algorithm. Its time-efficiency is measured according to two different underlying synchrony assumptions. Whatever this assumption, a write operation always costs a round-trip delay, while a read operation costs always a round-trip delay in favorable circumstances (intuitively, when it is not concurrent with a write). When designing this algorithm, the design spirit was to be as close as possible to the one of the famous ABD algorithm (proposed by Attiya, Bar-Noy, and Dolev).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Two-Bit Messages are Sufficient to Implement Atomic Read/Write Registers in Crash-prone Systems

Atomic registers are certainly the most basic objects of computing science. Their implementation on top of an n-process asynchronous message-passing system has received a lot of attention. It has been shown that t \textless{} n/2 (where t is the maximal number of processes that may crash) is a necessary and sufficient requirement to build an atomic register on top of a crash-prone asynchronous message-passing system. Considering such a context, this paper presents an algorithm which implements a single-writer multi-reader atomic register with four message types only, and where no message needs to carry control information in addition to its type. Hence, two bits are sufficient to capture all the control information carried by all the implementation messages. Moreover, the messages of two types need to carry a data value while the messages of the two other types carry no value at all. As far as we know, this algorithm is the first with such an optimality property on the size of control information carried by messages. It is also particularly efficient from a time complexity point of view.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Vertex Coloring with Communication and Local Memory Constraints in Synchronous Broadcast Networks

The vertex coloring problem has received a lot of attention in the context of synchronous round-based systems where, at each round, a process can send a message to all its neighbors, and receive a message from each of them. Hence, this communication model is particularly suited to point-to-point communication channels. Several vertex coloring algorithms suited to these systems have been proposed. They differ mainly in the number of rounds they require and the number of colors they use. This paper considers a broadcast/receive communication model in which message collisions and message conflicts can occur (a collision occurs when, during the same round, messages are sent to the same process by too many neighbors; a conflict occurs when a process and one of its neighbors broadcast during the same round). This communication model is suited to systems where processes share communication bandwidths. More precisely,the paper considers the case where, during a round, a process may either broadcast a message to its neighbors or receive a message from at most $m$ of them. This captures communication-related constraints or a local memory constraint stating that, whatever the number of neighbors of a process, its local memory allows it to receive and store at most $m$ messages during each round. The paper defines first the corresponding generic vertex multi-coloring problem (a vertex can have several colors). It focuses then on tree networks, for which it presents a lower bound on the number of colors $K$ that are necessary (namely, $K=\lceil\fracΔ{m}\rceil+1$, where $Δ$ is the maximal degree of the communication graph), and an ssociated coloring algorithm, which is optimal with respect to $K$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Necessary Condition for Byzantine $k$-Set Agreement

This short paper presents a necessary condition for Byzantine $k$-set agreement in (synchronous or asynchronous) message-passing systems and asynchronous shared memory systems where the processes communicate through atomic single-writer multi-reader registers. It gives a proof, which is particularly simple, that $k$-set agreement cannot be solved $t$-resiliently in an $n$-process system when $n \leq 2t + \frac{t}{k}$. This bound is tight for the case $k=1$ (Byzantine consensus) in synchronous message-passing systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Anonymous Obstruction-free $(n,k)$-Set Agreement with $n-k+1$ Atomic Read/Write Registers

The $k$-set agreement problem is a generalization of the consensus problem. Namely, assuming each process proposes a value, each non-faulty process has to decide a value such that each decided value was proposed, and no more than $k$ different values are decided. This is a hard problem in the sense that it cannot be solved in asynchronous systems as soon as $k$ or more processes may crash. One way to circumvent this impossibility consists in weakening its termination property, requiring that a process terminates (decides) only if it executes alone during a long enough period. This is the well-known obstruction-freedom progress condition. Considering a system of $n$ {\it anonymous asynchronous} processes, which communicate through atomic {\it read/write registers only}, and where {\it any number of processes may crash}, this paper addresses and solves the challenging open problem of designing an obstruction-free $k$-set agreement algorithm with $(n-k+1)$ atomic registers only. From a shared memory cost point of view, this algorithm is the best algorithm known so far, thereby establishing a new upper bound on the number of registers needed to solve the problem (its gain is $(n-k)$ with respect to the previous upper bound). The algorithm is then extended to address the repeated version of $(n,k)$-set agreement. As it is optimal in the number of atomic read/write registers, this algorithm closes the gap on previously established lower/upper bounds for both the anonymous and non-anonymous versions of the repeated $(n,k)$-set agreement problem. Finally, for $1 \leq x\leq k \textless{} n$, a generalization suited to $x$-obstruction-freedom is also described, which requires $(n-k+x)$ atomic registers only.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Atomic Read/Write Memory in Signature-free Byzantine Asynchronous Message-passing Systems

This article presents a signature-free distributed algorithm which builds an atomic read/write shared memory on top of an $n$-process asynchronous message-passing system in which up to $t<n/3$ processes may commit Byzantine failures. From a conceptual point of view, this algorithm is designed to be as close as possible to the algorithm proposed by Attiya, Bar-Noy and Dolev (JACM 1995), which builds an atomic register in an $n$-process asynchronous message-passing system where up to $t<n/2$ processes may crash. The proposed algorithm is particularly simple. It does not use cryptography to cope with Byzantine processes, and is optimal from a $t$-resilience point of view ($t<n/3$). A read operation requires $O(n)$ messages, and a write operation requires $O(n^2)$ messages.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Fisheye Consistency: Keeping Data in Synch in a Georeplicated World

Over the last thirty years, numerous consistency conditions for replicated data have been proposed and implemented. Popular examples of such conditions include linearizability (or atomicity), sequential consistency, causal consistency, and eventual consistency. These consistency conditions are usually defined independently from the computing entities (nodes) that manipulate the replicated data; i.e., they do not take into account how computing entities might be linked to one another, or geographically distributed. To address this lack, as a first contribution, this paper introduces the notion of proximity graph between computing nodes. If two nodes are connected in this graph, their operations must satisfy a strong consistency condition, while the operations invoked by other nodes are allowed to satisfy a weaker condition. The second contribution is the use of such a graph to provide a generic approach to the hybridization of data consistency conditions into the same system. We illustrate this approach on sequential consistency and causal consistency, and present a model in which all data operations are causally consistent, while operations by neighboring processes in the proximity graph are sequentially consistent. The third contribution of the paper is the design and the proof of a distributed algorithm based on this proximity graph, which combines sequential consistency and causal consistency (the resulting condition is called fisheye consistency). In doing so the paper not only extends the domain of consistency conditions, but provides a generic provably correct solution of direct relevance to modern georeplicated systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Specifying Concurrent Problems: Beyond Linearizability

Tasks and objects are two predominant ways of specifying distributed problems. A task is specified by an input/output relation, defining for each set of processes that may run concurrently, and each assignment of inputs to the processes in the set, the valid outputs of the processes. An object is specified by an automaton describing the outputs the object may produce when it is accessed sequentially. Thus, tasks explicitly state what may happen only when sets of processes run concurrently, while objects only specify what happens when processes access the object sequentially. Each one requires its own implementation notion, to tell when an execution satisfies the specification. For objects linearizability is commonly used, a very elegant and useful consistency condition. For tasks implementation notions are less explored. The paper introduces the notion of interval-sequential object. The corresponding implementation notion of interval-linearizability generalizes linearizability, and allows to associate states along the interval of execution of an operation. Interval-linearizability allows to specify any task, however, there are sequential one-shot objects that cannot be expressed as tasks, under the simplest interpretation of a task. It also shows that a natural extension of the notion of a task is expressive enough to specify any interval-sequential object.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Stabilizing Server-Based Storage in Byzantine Asynchronous Message-Passing Systems

A stabilizing Byzantine single-writer single-reader (SWSR) regular register, which stabilizes after the first invoked write operation, is first presented. Then, new/old ordering inversions are eliminated by the use of a (bounded) sequence number for writes, obtaining a practically stabilizing SWSR atomic register. A practically stabilizing Byzantine single-writer multi-reader (SWMR) atomic register is then obtained by using several copies of SWSR atomic registers. Finally, bounded time-stamps, with a time-stamp per writer, together with SWMR atomic registers, are used to construct a practically stabilizing Byzantine multi-writer multi-reader (MWMR) atomic register. In a system of $n$ servers implementing an atomic register, and in addition to transient failures, the constructions tolerate t<n/8 Byzantine servers if communication is asynchronous, and t<n/3 Byzantine servers if it is synchronous. The noteworthy feature of the proposed algorithms is that (to our knowledge) these are the first that build an atomic read/write storage on top of asynchronous servers prone to transient failures, and where up to t of them can be Byzantine.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Failure Detectors in Homonymous Distributed Systems (with an Application to Consensus)

This paper addresses the consensus problem in homonymous distributed systems where processes are prone to crash failures and have no initial knowledge of the system membership ("homonymous" means that several processes may have the same identifier). New classes of failure detectors suited to these systems are first defined. Among them, the classes HΩ and HΣ are introduced that are the homonymous counterparts of the classes Ω and Σ, respectively. (Recall that the pair <Ω,Σ> defines the weakest failure detector to solve consensus.) Then, the paper shows how HΩ and HΣ can be implemented in homonymous systems without membership knowledge (under different synchrony requirements). Finally, two algorithms are presented that use these failure detectors to solve consensus in homonymous asynchronous systems where there is no initial knowledge of the membership. One algorithm solves consensus with <HΩ,HΣ>, while the other uses only HΩ, but needs a majority of correct processes. Observe that the systems with unique identifiers and anonymous systems are extreme cases of homonymous systems from which follows that all these results also apply to these systems. Interestingly, the new failure detector class HΩ can be implemented with partial synchrony, while the analogous class AΩ defined for anonymous systems can not be implemented (even in synchronous systems). Hence, the paper provides us with the first proof showing that consensus can be solved in anonymous systems with only partial synchrony (and a majority of correct processes).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access