BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Michel Busquet

Michel Busquet appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
astro-ph.SRphysics.plasm-phastro-ph.HEastro-ph.IMphysics.atom-phphysics.ins-det

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Reply to Reply and Further Analysis of paper "New probing techniques of radiative shocks" (C. Stehle et al, Opt.Comm. 285, 64 (2012))

We show in this paper that the "reply to comment" by Chantal Stehlé et al was not satisfactorily and is contradictory to their latest results. The analysis of the published results of their last campaign reveals an average shock velocity below 20 km/s which should not be compatible with the existence of a radiative precursor. Furthermore, XUV probing is sensitive to density more than to temperature and is not suited to probe a radiative precursor, which is a pure temperature wave. These results also suggest exploding back layers of the pusher and some jet originating from a crater at the back of the pusher.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Comment on "New probing techniques of radiative shocks, by C.Stehle et al"

In this comment, we discuss the possibility of imaging the radiative precursor of a strong shock with a 21.2 nm soft x-ray laser probe and we analyze the data presented in C.Stehle et al "New probing techniques of radiative shocks", (Optics Communications 285, 64, 2012) in order to derive some estimation of the achieved resolution. We show that the presented results are inconclusive for the existence of a radiative precursor. Furthermore, our best estimation of cold and warm Xenon VUV opacities tells that 21.2 nm backlighting would not be able to probe this radiative precursor.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Effect of incoming radiation on the non-LTE spectrum of Xe at Te = 100 eV

The effect of a diluted Planckian radiation field on a Xe gas at the electron temperature of 100 eV is investigated within the framework of a Collisional Radiative Model, using the HULLAC code. The atomic model spans 19 charge states, includes 20 375 configurations and contains more than 2 10^6 levels. We have simulated detailed spectra comprising more than 10^9 transitions with the Mixed UTA model. The radiation temperature Tr is varied from 0 to 1.5 Te. The dilution factor, D, applied to decrease the radiation field, is varied independently from 0 to 3 at fixed Tr = Te. In both cases, the average charge state Z* increases from 15 to 27, but in different ways. It is shown that even a dilution D = 0.01 changes Z* by more than 1.5. Different combinations of Tr and D yielding exactly the same Z*, may give line ratios sufficiently different to be observed. This fact is explained by the interplay of the shape of the radiation field and the atomic structure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access