Paper detail

Effect of incoming radiation on the non-LTE spectrum of Xe at Te = 100 eV

The effect of a diluted Planckian radiation field on a Xe gas at the electron temperature of 100 eV is investigated within the framework of a Collisional Radiative Model, using the HULLAC code. The atomic model spans 19 charge states, includes 20 375 configurations and contains more than 2 10^6 levels. We have simulated detailed spectra comprising more than 10^9 transitions with the Mixed UTA model. The radiation temperature Tr is varied from 0 to 1.5 Te. The dilution factor, D, applied to decrease the radiation field, is varied independently from 0 to 3 at fixed Tr = Te. In both cases, the average charge state Z* increases from 15 to 27, but in different ways. It is shown that even a dilution D = 0.01 changes Z* by more than 1.5. Different combinations of Tr and D yielding exactly the same Z*, may give line ratios sufficiently different to be observed. This fact is explained by the interplay of the shape of the radiation field and the atomic structure.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.