BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Michael Stiglmayr

Michael Stiglmayr contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OCmath.COComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceDiscrete MathematicsMachine LearningMathematical Software

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Adapting Polyhedral Dominance Cones to Ordinal Preference Structures

In combinatorial optimization, ordinal costs can be used to model the quality of elements whenever numerical values are not available. When considering, for example, routing problems for cyclists, the safety of a street can be ranked in ordered categories like safe (separate bike lane), medium safe (street with a bike lane) and unsafe (street without a bike lane). However, ordinal optimization may suggest unrealistic solutions with huge detours to avoid unsafe street segments. In this paper, we investigate how partial preference information regarding the relative quality of the ordinal categories can be used to improve the relevance of the computed solutions. By introducing preference weights which describe how much better a category is at least or at most, compared to the subsequent category, we enlarge the ordinal dominance cone. This leads to a smaller set of alternatives, i. e., of ordinally efficient solutions. We show that the corresponding weighted ordinal ordering cone is a polyhedral cone and provide descriptions via its extreme rays and via its facets. The latter implies a linear transformation to an associated multi-objective optimization problem. This paves the way for the application of standard multi-objective solution approaches. We demonstrate the usefulness of the weighted ordinal ordering cone by investigating a safest path problem with different preference weights. Moreover, we investigate the interrelation between the weighted ordering cone to standard dominance concepts of multi-objective optimization, like, e.g., Pareto dominance, lexicographic dominance and weighted sum dominance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Adaptive Improvements of Multi-Objective Branch and Bound

Branch and bound methods which are based on the principle "divide and conquer" are a well established solution approach in single-objective integer programming. In multi-objective optimization branch and bound algorithms are increasingly attracting interest. However, the larger number of objectives raises additional difficulties for implicit enumeration approaches like branch and bound. Since bounding and pruning is considerably weaker in multiple objectives, many branches have to be (partially) searched and may not be pruned directly. The adaptive use of objective space information can guide the search in promising directions to determine a good approximation of the Pareto front already in early stages of the algorithm. In particular we focus in this article on improving the branching and queuing of subproblems and the handling of lower bound sets. In our numerical test we evaluate the impact of the proposed methods in comparison to a standard implementation of multiobjective branch and bound on knapsack problems, generalized assignment problems and (un)capacitated facility location problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Ordinal Optimization Through Multi-objective Reformulation

We analyze combinatorial optimization problems with ordinal, i.e., non-additive, objective functions that assign categories (like good, medium and bad) rather than cost coefficients to the elements of feasible solutions. We review different optimality concepts for ordinal optimization problems and discuss their similarities and differences. We then focus on two prevalent optimality concepts that are shown to be equivalent. Our main result is a bijective linear transformation that transforms ordinal optimization problems to associated standard multi-objective optimization problems with binary cost coefficients. Since this transformation preserves all properties of the underlying problem, problem-specific solution methods remain applicable. A prominent example is dynamic programming and Bellman's principle of optimality, that can be applied, e.g., to ordinal shortest path and ordinal knapsack problems. We extend our results to multi-objective optimization problems that combine ordinal and real-valued objective functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Multi-objective Matroid Optimization with Ordinal Weights

Bi-objective optimization problems on matroids are in general intractable and their corresponding decision problems are in general NP-hard. However, if one of the objective functions is restricted to binary cost coefficients the problem becomes efficiently solvable by an exhaustive swap algorithm. Binary cost coefficients often represent two categories and are thus a special case of ordinal coefficients that are in general non-additive. In this paper we consider ordinal objective functions with more than two categories in the context of matroid optimization. We introduce several problem variants that can be distinguished w.r.t. their respective optimization goals, analyze their interrelations, and derive a polynomial time solution method that is based on the repeated solution of matroid intersection problems. Numerical tests on minimum spanning tree problems and on partition matroids confirm the efficiency of the approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient and Sparse Neural Networks by Pruning Weights in a Multiobjective Learning Approach

Overparameterization and overfitting are common concerns when designing and training deep neural networks, that are often counteracted by pruning and regularization strategies. However, these strategies remain secondary to most learning approaches and suffer from time and computational intensive procedures. We suggest a multiobjective perspective on the training of neural networks by treating its prediction accuracy and the network complexity as two individual objective functions in a biobjective optimization problem. As a showcase example, we use the cross entropy as a measure of the prediction accuracy while adopting an l1-penalty function to assess the total cost (or complexity) of the network parameters. The latter is combined with an intra-training pruning approach that reinforces complexity reduction and requires only marginal extra computational cost. From the perspective of multiobjective optimization, this is a truly large-scale optimization problem. We compare two different optimization paradigms: On the one hand, we adopt a scalarization-based approach that transforms the biobjective problem into a series of weighted-sum scalarizations. On the other hand we implement stochastic multi-gradient descent algorithms that generate a single Pareto optimal solution without requiring or using preference information. In the first case, favorable knee solutions are identified by repeated training runs with adaptively selected scalarization parameters. Preliminary numerical results on exemplary convolutional neural networks confirm that large reductions in the complexity of neural networks with neglibile loss of accuracy are possible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

GivEn -- Shape Optimization for Gas Turbines in Volatile Energy Networks

This paper describes the project GivEn that develops a novel multicriteria optimization process for gas turbine blades and vanes using modern "adjoint" shape optimization algorithms. Given the many start and shut-down processes of gas power plants in volatile energy grids, besides optimizing gas turbine geometries for efficiency, the durability understood as minimization of the probability of failure is a design objective of increasing importance. We also describe the underlying coupling structure of the multiphysical simulations and use modern, gradient based multicriteria optimization procedures to enhance the exploration of Pareto-optimal solutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access