BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Kathrin Klamroth

Kathrin Klamroth appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.OCmath.COData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceMachine Learningmath.NANumerical Analysis

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Adapting Polyhedral Dominance Cones to Ordinal Preference Structures

In combinatorial optimization, ordinal costs can be used to model the quality of elements whenever numerical values are not available. When considering, for example, routing problems for cyclists, the safety of a street can be ranked in ordered categories like safe (separate bike lane), medium safe (street with a bike lane) and unsafe (street without a bike lane). However, ordinal optimization may suggest unrealistic solutions with huge detours to avoid unsafe street segments. In this paper, we investigate how partial preference information regarding the relative quality of the ordinal categories can be used to improve the relevance of the computed solutions. By introducing preference weights which describe how much better a category is at least or at most, compared to the subsequent category, we enlarge the ordinal dominance cone. This leads to a smaller set of alternatives, i. e., of ordinally efficient solutions. We show that the corresponding weighted ordinal ordering cone is a polyhedral cone and provide descriptions via its extreme rays and via its facets. The latter implies a linear transformation to an associated multi-objective optimization problem. This paves the way for the application of standard multi-objective solution approaches. We demonstrate the usefulness of the weighted ordinal ordering cone by investigating a safest path problem with different preference weights. Moreover, we investigate the interrelation between the weighted ordering cone to standard dominance concepts of multi-objective optimization, like, e.g., Pareto dominance, lexicographic dominance and weighted sum dominance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Biobjective Optimization Problems on Matroids with Binary Costs

Like most multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems, biobjective optimization problems on matroids are in general intractable and their corresponding decision problems are in general NP-hard. In this paper, we consider biobjective optimization problems on matroids where one of the objective functions is restricted to binary cost coefficients. We show that in this case the problem has a connected efficient set with respect to a natural definition of a neighborhood structure and hence, can be solved efficiently using a neighborhood search approach. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first non-trivial problem on matroids where connectedness of the efficient set can be established. The theoretical results are validated by numerical experiments with biobjective minimum spanning tree problems (graphic matroids) and with biobjective knapsack problems with a cardinality constraint (uniform matroids). In the context of the minimum spanning tree problem, coloring all edges with cost 0 green and all edges with cost 1 red leads to an equivalent problem where we want to simultaneously minimize one general objective and the number of red edges (which defines the second objective) in a Pareto sense.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Ordinal Optimization Through Multi-objective Reformulation

We analyze combinatorial optimization problems with ordinal, i.e., non-additive, objective functions that assign categories (like good, medium and bad) rather than cost coefficients to the elements of feasible solutions. We review different optimality concepts for ordinal optimization problems and discuss their similarities and differences. We then focus on two prevalent optimality concepts that are shown to be equivalent. Our main result is a bijective linear transformation that transforms ordinal optimization problems to associated standard multi-objective optimization problems with binary cost coefficients. Since this transformation preserves all properties of the underlying problem, problem-specific solution methods remain applicable. A prominent example is dynamic programming and Bellman's principle of optimality, that can be applied, e.g., to ordinal shortest path and ordinal knapsack problems. We extend our results to multi-objective optimization problems that combine ordinal and real-valued objective functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Multi-objective Matroid Optimization with Ordinal Weights

Bi-objective optimization problems on matroids are in general intractable and their corresponding decision problems are in general NP-hard. However, if one of the objective functions is restricted to binary cost coefficients the problem becomes efficiently solvable by an exhaustive swap algorithm. Binary cost coefficients often represent two categories and are thus a special case of ordinal coefficients that are in general non-additive. In this paper we consider ordinal objective functions with more than two categories in the context of matroid optimization. We introduce several problem variants that can be distinguished w.r.t. their respective optimization goals, analyze their interrelations, and derive a polynomial time solution method that is based on the repeated solution of matroid intersection problems. Numerical tests on minimum spanning tree problems and on partition matroids confirm the efficiency of the approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient and Sparse Neural Networks by Pruning Weights in a Multiobjective Learning Approach

Overparameterization and overfitting are common concerns when designing and training deep neural networks, that are often counteracted by pruning and regularization strategies. However, these strategies remain secondary to most learning approaches and suffer from time and computational intensive procedures. We suggest a multiobjective perspective on the training of neural networks by treating its prediction accuracy and the network complexity as two individual objective functions in a biobjective optimization problem. As a showcase example, we use the cross entropy as a measure of the prediction accuracy while adopting an l1-penalty function to assess the total cost (or complexity) of the network parameters. The latter is combined with an intra-training pruning approach that reinforces complexity reduction and requires only marginal extra computational cost. From the perspective of multiobjective optimization, this is a truly large-scale optimization problem. We compare two different optimization paradigms: On the one hand, we adopt a scalarization-based approach that transforms the biobjective problem into a series of weighted-sum scalarizations. On the other hand we implement stochastic multi-gradient descent algorithms that generate a single Pareto optimal solution without requiring or using preference information. In the first case, favorable knee solutions are identified by repeated training runs with adaptively selected scalarization parameters. Preliminary numerical results on exemplary convolutional neural networks confirm that large reductions in the complexity of neural networks with neglibile loss of accuracy are possible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

GivEn -- Shape Optimization for Gas Turbines in Volatile Energy Networks

This paper describes the project GivEn that develops a novel multicriteria optimization process for gas turbine blades and vanes using modern "adjoint" shape optimization algorithms. Given the many start and shut-down processes of gas power plants in volatile energy grids, besides optimizing gas turbine geometries for efficiency, the durability understood as minimization of the probability of failure is a design objective of increasing importance. We also describe the underlying coupling structure of the multiphysical simulations and use modern, gradient based multicriteria optimization procedures to enhance the exploration of Pareto-optimal solutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Tracing locally Pareto optimal points by numerical integration

We suggest a novel approach for the efficient and reliable approximation of the Pareto front of sufficiently smooth unconstrained bi-criteria optimization problems. Optimality conditions formulated for weighted sum scalarizations of the problem yield a description of (parts of) the Pareto front as a parametric curve, parameterized by the scalarization parameter (i.e., the weight in the weighted sum scalarization). Its sensitivity w.r.t. parameter variations can be described by an ordinary differential equation (ODE). Starting from an arbitrary initial Pareto optimal solution, the Pareto front can then be traced by numerical integration. We provide an error analysis based on Lipschitz properties and suggest an explicit Runge-Kutta method for the numerical solution of the ODE. The method is validated on bi-criteria convex quadratic programming problems for which the exact solution is explicitly known, and numerically tested on complex bi-criteria shape optimization problems involving finite element discretizations of the state equation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Box Decomposition Algorithm to Compute the Hypervolume Indicator

We propose a new approach to the computation of the hypervolume indicator, based on partitioning the dominated region into a set of axis-parallel hyperrectangles or boxes. We present a nonincremental algorithm and an incremental algorithm, which allows insertions of points, whose time complexities are $O(n^{\lfloor \frac{p-1}{2} \rfloor+1})$ and $O(n^{\lfloor \frac{p}{2} \rfloor+1})$, respectively. While the theoretical complexity of such a method is lower bounded by the complexity of the partition, which is, in the worst-case, larger than the best upper bound on the complexity of the hypervolume computation, we show that it is practically efficient. In particular, the nonincremental algorithm competes with the currently most practically efficient algorithms. Finally, we prove an enhanced upper bound of $O(n^{p-1})$ and a lower bound of $Ω(n^{\lfloor \frac{p}{2}\rfloor} \log n )$ for $p \geq 4$ on the worst-case complexity of the WFG algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On the representation of the search region in multi-objective optimization

Given a finite set $N$ of feasible points of a multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem, the search region corresponds to the part of the objective space containing all the points that are not dominated by any point of $N$, i.e. the part of the objective space which may contain further nondominated points. In this paper, we consider a representation of the search region by a set of tight local upper bounds (in the minimization case) that can be derived from the points of $N$. Local upper bounds play an important role in methods for generating or approximating the nondominated set of an MOO problem, yet few works in the field of MOO address their efficient incremental determination. We relate this issue to the state of the art in computational geometry and provide several equivalent definitions of local upper bounds that are meaningful in MOO. We discuss the complexity of this representation in arbitrary dimension, which yields an improved upper bound on the number of solver calls in epsilon-constraint-like methods to generate the nondominated set of a discrete MOO problem. We analyze and enhance a first incremental approach which operates by eliminating redundancies among local upper bounds. We also study some properties of local upper bounds, especially concerning the issue of redundant local upper bounds, that give rise to a new incremental approach which avoids such redundancies. Finally, the complexities of the incremental approaches are compared from the theoretical and empirical points of view.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A linear bound on the number of scalarizations needed to solve discrete tricriteria optimization problems

General multi-objective optimization problems are often solved by a sequence of parametric single objective problems, so-called scalarizations. If the set of nondominated points is finite, and if an appropriate scalarization is employed, the entire nondominated set can be generated in this way. In the bicriteria case it is well known that this can be realized by an adaptive approach which, given an appropriate initial search space, requires the solution of a number of subproblems which is at most two times the number of nondominated points. For higher dimensional problems, no linear methods were known up to now. We present a new procedure for finding the entire nondominated set of tricriteria optimization problems for which the number of scalarized subproblems to be solved is at most three times the number of nondominated points of the underlying problem. The approach includes an iterative update of the search space that, given a (sub-)set of nondominated points, describes the area in which additional nondominated points may be located. In particular, we show that the number of boxes, into which the search space is decomposed, depends linearly on the number of nondominated points.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access